CVE-2018-13587

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DECToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13670

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GFCB, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13539

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Bcxss, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13676

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Orderbook Presale Token OBP, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13734

The CVE-2018-13734 entry affects the AZTToken Ethereum token contract; specifically the mintToken function. The vulnerability is an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. Documents consistently describe the root cause as overflow in mintToken, ...

CVE-2018-13783

The CVE-2018-13783 entry concerns the mintToken function of a JiucaiToken smart contract where an integer overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the stated root cause and impact: balance manipulation by the owner due to overflow. Public refere...

CVE-2018-13763

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Ublasti, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13655

CVE-2018-13655 concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for the GFC Ethereum token. The underlying issue is an integer overflow in mintToken, which allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The available connected documents confirm t...

CVE-2018-13671

The CVE-2018-13671 entry concerns DinsteinCoin, an Ethereum token whose smart-contract mintToken function contains an integer overflow. This vulnerability allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, as described in the NVD entry and related references. The connected...

CVE-2018-13716

The CVE-2018-13716 entry concerns a smart contract for sexhdsolo (Ethereum token) where the mintToken function suffers an integer overflow. The vulnerability allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, indicating a flaw in balance accounting that can be manipulated ...

CVE-2018-13757

CVE-2018-13757 affects Coinquer’s Ethereum token smart contract. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the underlying vulnerability and is the documented impact in sources referencing the Coinque...

CVE-2018-13624

WXSLToken is affected: the mintToken function in its Ethereum smart contract has an integer overflow, enabling the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The CVE entry and linked sources confirm the root cause and potential impact (balance manipulation). No explicit remed...

CVE-2018-13565

CVE-2018-13565 affects the Co2Bit Ethereum token smart contract, specifically the mintToken function. The root cause is an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance to a chosen value. This implies a direct integrity risk for balances and could enable ma...

CVE-2018-13718

CVE-2018-13718 concerns the FuturXe Ethereum token where the mintToken function has an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set an arbitrary user’s balance. This is a developer-facing vulnerability in the smart contract implementation, with the root cause described as an integer overflow...

CVE-2018-13513

CVE-2018-13513 concerns Ubiou’s Ethereum token smart contract where the mintToken function contains an integer overflow, allowing the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The issue is described consistently across sources (CNVD-2018-13186, NVD/CVE-2018-13513, CNVD varia...

CVE-2018-13539

The CVE-2018-13539 issue affects the Bcxss Ethereum token. The vulnerability is an overflow in the contract’s mintToken function that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken, enabling balance manipulation. Public det...

CVE-2018-13536

The CVE-2018-13536 entry concerns ERC20_ICO: mintToken in the smart contract exhibits an integer overflow. This weakness allows the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance. Affected component: mintToken in the ERC20_ICO contract. Root cause: integer overflow in the balance assignment...

CVE-2018-13738

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PELOCoinToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13764

CVE-2018-13764 describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of the BiquToken Ethereum smart contract, enabling the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. The vulnerability is rooted in improper arithmetic handling within mintToken, allowing value manipulation t...

CVE-2018-13678

CVE-2018-13678 concerns a vulnerability in the Lottery Ethereum token contract. The mintToken function has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The root cause and impact are described in the sources; however, the connected documents d...