CVE-2018-13502

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for HeliumNetwork, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13752

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Thread, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13649

The CVE-2018-13649 entry concerns a vulnerability in a smart contract implementing Deploy, an Ethereum token. The issue is in the mintToken function, where an integer overflow allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. This represents a critical integrity risk for ...

CVE-2018-13626

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for SemainToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13560

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for KelvinToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13766

The CVE-2018-13766 entry concerns the mintToken function of the Easticoin Ethereum token smart contract. The vulnerability is an integer overflow in mintToken that allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. Affected component: the mintToken function in the Easticoi...

CVE-2018-13773

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Enterprise Token Ecosystem ETE Contract Name: NetkillerToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13620

CVE-2018-13620 affects TripCash’s Ethereum token smart contract. The mintToken function has an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the stated vulnerability and impact; no exploitation details or mitigations are provided in the suppli...

CVE-2018-13775

The CVE concerns the mintToken function in the RCKT_Coin Ethereum token smart contract. An integer overflow in mintToken could allow the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value, enabling arbitrary credit manipulation. The available sources confirm the vulnerability’s presen...

CVE-2018-13536

The CVE-2018-13536 entry concerns ERC20_ICO: mintToken in the smart contract exhibits an integer overflow. This weakness allows the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance. Affected component: mintToken in the ERC20_ICO contract. Root cause: integer overflow in the balance assignment...

CVE-2018-13513

CVE-2018-13513 concerns Ubiou’s Ethereum token smart contract where the mintToken function contains an integer overflow, allowing the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The issue is described consistently across sources (CNVD-2018-13186, NVD/CVE-2018-13513, CNVD varia...

CVE-2018-13539

The CVE-2018-13539 issue affects the Bcxss Ethereum token. The vulnerability is an overflow in the contract’s mintToken function that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken, enabling balance manipulation. Public det...

CVE-2018-13650

The CVE-2018-13650 entry concerns BitmaxerToken, an Ethereum token, where the mintToken function contains an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. This is the stated vulnerability and impact in the NVD entry; no exploitation details, aff...

CVE-2018-13753

CVE-2018-13753 concerns the mintToken function of a smart-contract implementation for DeWeiSecurityServiceToken (an Ethereum token). The vulnerability is an integer overflow in mintToken that could let the contract owner set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. This is described in the ...

CVE-2018-13758

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for LoliCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13600

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for AMToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13617

The CVE-2018-13617 issue affects CAPTOZ, an Ethereum token: the mintToken function in its smart contract permits an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is documented in the NVD entry describing the overflow and the owner-controlled...

CVE-2018-13541

The CVE-2018-13541 issue targets CryptoLeu’s Ethereum token smart contract. A concrete integer overflow in the mintToken function allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, indicating a control over token balances beyond intended logic. Affected component: the mint...

CVE-2018-13714

CVE-2018-13714 concerns the mintToken function in a CM Ethereum token smart contract. Affected component: the CM token’s smart contract code. Root cause: integer overflow in mintToken that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary address. Impact: potential manipulation of toke...

CVE-2018-13576

The CVE-2018-13576 issue affects Escut (ESCT) Ethereum token contract JuntsPerCreixer. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, per the connected documents. Impact stated: owner can manipulate balances, with no ...