Lucene search
K

Oracle Database Protection Mechanism Bypass Vulnerability

🗓️ 13 Dec 2021 00:00:00Reported by Moritz BechlerType 
zdt
 zdt
🔗 0day.today👁 280 Views

Oracle Database NNE Bypass Vulnerability in JDBC Thin Clien

Related
Code
Product:                   Database
Manufacturer:              Oracle
Affected Version(s):       12.1.0.2, 12.2.0.1, 19c
Tested Version(s):         18c
Vulnerability Type:        Protection Mechanism Failure (CWE-693)
Risk Level:                High
Solution Status:           Fixed
Manufacturer Notification: 2021-03-17
Solution Date:             2021-08-07
Public Disclosure:         2021-12-10
CVE Reference:             CVE-2021-2351
Author of Advisory:        Moritz Bechler, SySS GmbH

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Overview:

Oracle Database is a general purpose relational database management 
system (RDMBS).

The manufacturer describes the product as follows (see [1]):

"Oracle database products offer customers cost-optimized and high-performance 
versions of Oracle Database, the world's leading converged, multi-model 
database management system, as well as in-memory, NoSQL and MySQL databases.
Oracle Autonomous Database, available on premises via Oracle Cloud@Customer 
or in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, enables customers to simplify relational 
database environments and reduce management workloads."

To protect the client/server communication, a proprietary security protocol 
"Native Network Encryption" (NNE) is used. 
A TLS-based alternative can optionally be configured.

Due to insecure fallback behavior, a man-in-the-middle attacker can bypass
NNE's protection against man-in-the-middle attacks and hijack authenticated
connections. In some configurations, a full man-in-the-middle attack is
possible.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Vulnerability Details:

To mitigate against man-in-the-middle attacks on the initial Diffie-
Hellman key exchange, the protocol implements the mixin of an additional
shared key that is established by the authentication protocol 
(typically O5Logon). This relies on the fact that both client and server
have knowledge of the user password (hash), which a potential attacker 
does not have.

For more details on the protocol, refer to our paper [4].

SySS, however, found out that the JDBC Thin client implementation did 
not implement that fold-in and its connections were still accepted 
by database servers. The server performs a fallback to the initial 
session key if the decryption/integrity check fails.

That original key is known to an attacker who has performed a classic
man-in-the-middle attack against the initial Diffie-Hellman key exchange.

For JDBC Thin client, this allows direct observation and manipulation
of the application level traffic, as both parties still use the 
original keys.

Nevertheless, other clients, which implement the authentication key fold-in, 
are still vulnerable. While the client expects a different session key
after authentication has completed, it can simply be dropped/ignored. 
The server side of the connection at this point is already authenticated 
and communication is still possible due to the key fallback. This grants
access to the database system as the original victim user.

This attack is successful in all known configurations, except if TLS
security is used.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Proof of Concept (PoC):

For protocol analysis and attacks, SySS built a proxy server implementing
the database protocol fundamentals and NNE. The proxy can perform a
man-in-the-middle attack against the Diffie-Hellman key exchange during
NNE negotation. Then, the necessary translation and adjustment between
the client and server, which are now using different session keys, is
performed.

Launching the proxy and redirecting a client connection to it, the
man-in-the-middle attack is performed. The encrypted part of the further
protocol negotiation can be observed, including the authentication exchange.
Then, the client is dropped, and the proxy sends a predefined query to the 
server.

The following log excerpt shows an OCI client (21.3) connecting as the
system user. The connection is hijacked and the system user table is
queried by the attack proxy.

> ./mitm.py --targethost 172.17.0.1 --mitmDH --hijackConnection
[...]
            |###[ Service ]### 
            |  serviceId = encryption
            |  numParameters= 2
            |  unknown1  = 0
            |###[ EncryptionResp ]### 
            |     version   = 12000000
            |     algo      = AES256
            |###[ Service ]### 
            |  serviceId = integrity
            |  numParameters= 8
            |  unknown1  = 0
            |###[ IntegrityResp ]### 
            |     version   = 12000000
            |     algo      = SHA256
            |     len1      = 0800
            |     len2      = 0800
            |     generator = [...]
            |     prime     = [...]
            |     public    = [...]
            |     rand      = 666F6F206261722062617A206261742071757578

[...]
DEBUG:root:Forward server -> client
DEBUG:root:Received encrypted payload [...]
[...]\x0cAUTH_USER_ID\x01\x00\x00\x00\x019\x00\x00\x00\x00\x0f\x00\x00\x00\x0fAUTH_SESSION_ID[...]
[authentication completed at this point]
INFO:root:Initially hijacking connection
[...]
DEBUG:root:Received encrypted payload [...]
INFO:root:###[ TTIMsg ]### 
  TTCode    = 8
###[ RPA ]### 
     outNbPairs= None
     \nbPairs   \
      |###[ KVPair ]### 
      |  keyPtr    = None
      |  key       = b'\x00VOracle Database 18c Express Edition Release 18.0.0.0.0 - Production\nVersion 18.4.0.0'
[...]

INFO:root:b'[...]+select DISTINCT username FROM sys.all_users[...]
INFO:root:Send encrypted payload [...] len 368
[...]
DEBUG:root:Received encrypted payload [...]
INFO:root:###[ TTIMsg ]### 
  TTCode    = 6
###[ Raw ]### 
     load      = '[...]\x07\x06DBSNMP\x07\tAPPQOSSYS\x07\nGSMCATUSER\x07\x05GGSYS\x07\x03XDB[...]'

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Solution:

Update the Oracle Database servers and clients to the patched versions.
Enforce usage of a secured protocol version by setting the following options:

 SQLNET.ALLOW_WEAK_CRYPTO_CLIENTS=FALSE (server-side)
 SQLNET.ALLOW_WEAK_CRYPTO=FALSE (client-side)


Or use TLS-based transport security instead of Native Network Encryption.


More information:
https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
https://support.oracle.com/rs?type=doc&id=2791571.1 (customer account required)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Disclosure Timeline:

2021-03-02: Vulnerability discovered
2021-03-17: Vulnerability reported to manufacturer
2021-07-20: Initial patch release by manufacturer, 
2021-08-07: Final patches released by manufacturer
2021-12-10: Public disclosure of vulnerability

Data

Build on a solid foundation with Vulners data

We provide the essential building blocks for cybersecurity solutions with comprehensive, structured, and constantly updated vulnerability and exploits data

Api

Power your application with Vulners API

The Vulners REST API offers reliable, high-performance access to vulnerability intelligence, with 99.9% SLA uptime and CDN-backed data delivery for seamless global access

App

Assess and manage vulnerabilities with Vulners tools

Built on top of Vulners' database and SDK, end-user solutions give security professionals and developers lightweight and powerful tools for vulnerability remediation

13 Dec 2021 00:00Current
8High risk
Vulners AI Score8
CVSS 3.18.3
CVSS 25.1
EPSS0.03301
280