| Reporter | Title | Published | Views | Family All 23 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-11863 | 15 Nov 201703:29 | – | attackerkb | |
| CVE-2017-11872 | 15 Nov 201703:29 | – | attackerkb | |
| CVE-2017-11874 | 15 Nov 201703:29 | – | attackerkb | |
| Microsoft Windows Edge ChakraCore Security Bypass Vulnerability | 16 Nov 201700:00 | – | cnvd | |
| CVE-2017-11874 | 15 Nov 201703:00 | – | cve | |
| CVE-2017-11874 | 15 Nov 201703:00 | – | cvelist | |
| EUVD-2017-3471 | 7 Oct 202500:30 | – | euvd | |
| November 14, 2017—KB4048954 (OS Build 15063.726 and 15063.728) | 14 Nov 201708:00 | – | mskb | |
| November 14, 2017—KB4048955 (OS Build 16299.64) | 14 Nov 201708:00 | – | mskb | |
| KLA11140 Multiple vulnerabilities in Microsoft Edge and Internet Explorer | 14 Nov 201700:00 | – | kaspersky |
Chakra: CFG bypass due to a bug in ServerFreeAllocation
CVE-2017-11874
Chakra JIT server exposes a ServerFreeAllocation() method that can be used to free an existing JIT allocation (for example when the corresponding function gets freed).
The simplified function's implementation is:
context->SetValidCallTargetForCFG((PVOID)codeAddress, false);
context->GetCodeGenAllocators()->emitBufferManager.FreeAllocation((void*)codeAddress);
First, the implementation makes sure that the CFG flag for the codeAddress is set to 0 and then frees the allocation at this address.
The problem is that FreeAllocation is too permissive. Below is the simplified code of FreeAllocation():
while(allocation != nullptr)
{
if (address >= allocation->allocation->address && address < (allocation->allocation->address + allocation->bytesUsed))
{
...
this->allocationHeap.Free(allocation->allocation);
return true;
}
previous = allocation;
allocation = allocation->nextAllocation;
}
This means that the allocation will get freed not only if codeAddress points to the beginning of the allocation but also if codeAddress points *anywhere inside* the allocation.
So, if an attacker is able to change the codeAddress being used as an argument to ServerFreeAllocation() (e.g. with a read/write primitive inside a Content Process) and they increase codeAddress (but still let it point inside the same allocation), the allocation will get freed, but the CFG flag for the function will not be cleared correctly (the CFG flag will be cleared for the wrong address).
Later, if executable memory is allocated over the same (freed) space, the CFG target will still be valid, even if the new allocation will not be alligned perfectly with the old allocation.
This bug is subject to a 90 day disclosure deadline. After 90 days elapse
or a patch has been made broadly available, the bug report will become
visible to the public.
# 0day.today [2018-01-03] #Data
Build on a solid foundation with Vulners data
We provide the essential building blocks for cybersecurity solutions with comprehensive, structured, and constantly updated vulnerability and exploits data
Api
Power your application with Vulners API
The Vulners REST API offers reliable, high-performance access to vulnerability intelligence, with 99.9% SLA uptime and CDN-backed data delivery for seamless global access
App
Assess and manage vulnerabilities with Vulners tools
Built on top of Vulners' database and SDK, end-user solutions give security professionals and developers lightweight and powerful tools for vulnerability remediation