Lucene search
K

Microsoft Edge Chakra CFG Bypass By Overwriting JavaScript Bytecode Vulnerability

🗓️ 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00Reported by Google Security ResearchType 
zdt
 zdt
🔗 0day.today👁 15 Views

Microsoft Edge Chakra: Overwriting JavaScript bytecod

Code
Chakra: CFG bypass by overwriting JavaScript bytecode 




Assume an attacker has the ability to overwrite Chakra's bytecode, either through a read/write primitive or through an overflow type vulnerability. Let's take a look at the ArgOut_A bytecode instruction which is implmented in InterpreterStackFrame::OP_ArgOut_A:

    template <class T>
    void InterpreterStackFrame::OP_ArgOut_A(const unaligned T * playout)
    {
        SetOut(playout->Arg, GetReg(playout->Reg));
    }

And let's take a look at SetOut and GetReg functions:

    inline void InterpreterStackFrame::SetOut(ArgSlot outRegisterID, Var aValue)
    {
        Assert(m_outParams + outRegisterID < m_outSp);
        m_outParams[outRegisterID] = aValue;
    }

    template <typename RegSlotType>
    Var InterpreterStackFrame::GetReg(RegSlotType localRegisterID) const
    {
        Var value = m_localSlots[localRegisterID];
        ValidateRegValue(value);
        return value;
    }

Note there is an Assert() in SetOut() but that won't affect the behavior of the release version. Similarly, ValidateRegValue will only actually perform validation in the debug build.

If we can corrupt the bytecode of the ArgOut_A instruction (pointed to by playout) we can *read* an out-of-bounds value in GetReg() and then also *write* it out-of-bounds in SetOut. Note that out-of-bounds read/write here is limited in the sense that both playout->Arg and playout->Reg are 8-bit values but it is sufficient for our purpose.

If we already have a read/write primitive, this normally wouldn't give us new capabilities. But note that both m_outParams and m_localSlots actually point on the stack. Thus modifying the ArgOut_A layout will also give us a limited read/write primitive on the stack, which allows us to bypass CFG. For example, we might read some value we control in GetReg() and then use SetOut() to overwrite a return address, thus bypassing CFG. We might also read out a memory from the stack using GetReg() and then write it somewhere where we can extract it using JavaScript.

Note #1: There are other instructions that behave similarly such as ProfiledArgOut_A and ArgOut_Env

Note #2: These are most likely not the only bytecode instructions that allow an attacker to bypass CFG. In fact by dumb-fuzzing the bytecode and then interpreting it it is fairly easy to get RIP to point outside of the executable memory.

#  0day.today [2018-02-07]  #

Data

Build on a solid foundation with Vulners data

We provide the essential building blocks for cybersecurity solutions with comprehensive, structured, and constantly updated vulnerability and exploits data

Api

Power your application with Vulners API

The Vulners REST API offers reliable, high-performance access to vulnerability intelligence, with 99.9% SLA uptime and CDN-backed data delivery for seamless global access

App

Assess and manage vulnerabilities with Vulners tools

Built on top of Vulners' database and SDK, end-user solutions give security professionals and developers lightweight and powerful tools for vulnerability remediation