Lucene search
K

Cisco Ironport Cross Site Request Forgery / Cross Site Scripting

🗓️ 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00Reported by Pedro AndujarType 
zdt
 zdt
🔗 0day.today👁 45 Views

Cisco IronPort Security Management Appliance - Multiple security issues including Cross Site Request Forgery and Cross Site Scriptin

Related
Code
ReporterTitlePublishedViews
Family
Cisco
Cisco Content Filtering Devices Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
1 Jul 201312:44
cisco
CVE
CVE-2013-3395
2 Jul 201301:00
cve
CVE
CVE-2013-3396
26 Jun 201321:00
cve
Cvelist
CVE-2013-3395
2 Jul 201301:00
cvelist
Cvelist
CVE-2013-3396
26 Jun 201321:00
cvelist
EUVD
EUVD-2013-3330
7 Oct 202500:30
euvd
EUVD
EUVD-2013-3331
7 Oct 202500:30
euvd
NVD
CVE-2013-3395
2 Jul 201303:43
nvd
NVD
CVE-2013-3396
26 Jun 201321:55
nvd
OpenVAS
Cisco Content Security Management Appliance XSS and CSRF Vulnerabilities
4 Sep 201300:00
openvas
Rows per page
Tittle:   Cisco IronPort Security Management Appliance - Multiple issues
    Risk:   Medium
    Date:   20.May.2013
  Author:   Pedro Andujar
 Twitter:   @pandujar

              
.: [ INTRO ] :.


The Cisco Security Management Appliance helps to enable flexible management and comprehensive security control 
at the network gateway. Is a central platform for managing all policy, reporting, and auditing information 
for Cisco web and email security appliances.


.: [ TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION ] :.

Cisco IronPort Security Management Appliance M170 v7.9.1-030 (and probably other products), are prone to several security issues 
as described below;


.: [ ISSUE #1 }:.

Name: Reflected Cross Site Scripting
Severity: Low 
CVE: CVE-2013-3396

There is a lack of output escaping in the default error 500 page. When a exception occurs in the application, the error
description contains user unvalidated input from the request:

** PoC removed as requested by Cisco. **


.: [ ISSUE #2 }:.

Name: Stored Cross Site Scripting
Severity: Medium

Due to a lack of input validation on job_name, job_type, appliances_options and config_master parameters which are then 
printed unscapped on job_name, old_job_name, job_type, appliance_lists and config_master fields.


** PoC removed as requested by Cisco. **


.: [ ISSUE #3 }:.

Name: CSRF Token is not used
Severity: Low
CVE: CVE-2013-3395

CSRFKey is not used in some areas of the application, which make even easier to exploit Reflected XSS Issues. In the /report area 
of the application, we got no error even when completely removing the parameter CSRFKey; 

** PoC removed as requested by Cisco. **

See: http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=29844

.: [ ISSUE #4 }:.

Name: Lack of password obfuscation
Severity: Low

When exporting the configuration file even if you mark the "mask password" option, the SNMPv3 password still appears in cleartext.


.: [ CHANGELOG ] :.

  * 20/May/2013:   - Vulnerability found.
  * 27/May/2013:   - Vendor contacted.
  * 11/Jul/2013:   - Public Disclosure


.: [ SOLUTIONS ] :.

Thanks to Stefano De Crescenzo (Cisco PSIRT Team), because of his professional way of managing the entire process.

Stored XSS
CSCuh24755

Reflected XSS
http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityNotice/CVE-2013-3396

SNMP password issue
CSCuh27268, CSCuh70314

CSRF
http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityNotice/CVE-2013-3395

#  0day.today [2018-04-13]  #

Data

Build on a solid foundation with Vulners data

We provide the essential building blocks for cybersecurity solutions with comprehensive, structured, and constantly updated vulnerability and exploits data

Api

Power your application with Vulners API

The Vulners REST API offers reliable, high-performance access to vulnerability intelligence, with 99.9% SLA uptime and CDN-backed data delivery for seamless global access

App

Assess and manage vulnerabilities with Vulners tools

Built on top of Vulners' database and SDK, end-user solutions give security professionals and developers lightweight and powerful tools for vulnerability remediation