Lucene search

K
vulnrichmentLinuxVULNRICHMENT:CVE-2024-27031
HistoryMay 01, 2024 - 12:53 p.m.

CVE-2024-27031 NFS: Fix nfs_netfs_issue_read() xarray locking for writeback interrupt

2024-05-0112:53:29
Linux
github.com
1
linux kernel
nfs
vulnerability
xarray
locking
writeback
interrupt
deadlock

AI Score

6.5

Confidence

Low

SSVC

Exploitation

none

Automatable

no

Technical Impact

partial

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

NFS: Fix nfs_netfs_issue_read() xarray locking for writeback interrupt

The loop inside nfs_netfs_issue_read() currently does not disable
interrupts while iterating through pages in the xarray to submit
for NFS read. This is not safe though since after taking xa_lock,
another page in the mapping could be processed for writeback inside
an interrupt, and deadlock can occur. The fix is simple and clean
if we use xa_for_each_range(), which handles the iteration with RCU
while reducing code complexity.

The problem is easily reproduced with the following test:
mount -o vers=3,fsc 127.0.0.1:/export /mnt/nfs
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/nfs/file1.bin bs=4096 count=1
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
dd if=/mnt/nfs/file1.bin of=/dev/null
umount /mnt/nfs

On the console with a lockdep-enabled kernel a message similar to
the following will be seen:

================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
6.7.0-lockdbg+ #10 Not tainted

inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
test5/1708 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
ffff888127baa598 (&xa->xa_lock#4){+.?.}-{3:3}, at:
nfs_netfs_issue_read+0x1b2/0x4b0 [nfs]
{IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
lock_acquire+0x144/0x380
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4e/0xa0
__folio_end_writeback+0x17e/0x5c0
folio_end_writeback+0x93/0x1b0
iomap_finish_ioend+0xeb/0x6a0
blk_update_request+0x204/0x7f0
blk_mq_end_request+0x30/0x1c0
blk_complete_reqs+0x7e/0xa0
__do_softirq+0x113/0x544
__irq_exit_rcu+0xfe/0x120
irq_exit_rcu+0xe/0x20
sysvec_call_function_single+0x6f/0x90
asm_sysvec_call_function_single+0x1a/0x20
pv_native_safe_halt+0xf/0x20
default_idle+0x9/0x20
default_idle_call+0x67/0xa0
do_idle+0x2b5/0x300
cpu_startup_entry+0x34/0x40
start_secondary+0x19d/0x1c0
secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0x18f/0x19b
irq event stamp: 176891
hardirqs last enabled at (176891): [<ffffffffa67a0be4>]
_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x60
hardirqs last disabled at (176890): [<ffffffffa67a0899>]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x79/0xa0
softirqs last enabled at (176646): [<ffffffffa515d91e>]
__irq_exit_rcu+0xfe/0x120
softirqs last disabled at (176633): [<ffffffffa515d91e>]
__irq_exit_rcu+0xfe/0x120

other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:

    CPU0
    ----

lock(&xa->xa_lock#4);
<Interrupt>
lock(&xa->xa_lock#4);

*** DEADLOCK***

2 locks held by test5/1708:
#0: ffff888127baa498 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#22){++++}-{4:4}, at:
nfs_start_io_read+0x28/0x90 [nfs]
#1: ffff888127baa650 (mapping.invalidate_lock#3){.+.+}-{4:4}, at:
page_cache_ra_unbounded+0xa4/0x280

stack backtrace:
CPU: 6 PID: 1708 Comm: test5 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.7.0-lockdbg+
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39
04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x90
mark_lock+0xb3f/0xd20
__lock_acquire+0x77b/0x3360
_raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x80
nfs_netfs_issue_read+0x1b2/0x4b0 [nfs]
netfs_begin_read+0x77f/0x980 [netfs]
nfs_netfs_readahead+0x45/0x60 [nfs]
nfs_readahead+0x323/0x5a0 [nfs]
read_pages+0xf3/0x5c0
page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x1c8/0x280
filemap_get_pages+0x38c/0xae0
filemap_read+0x206/0x5e0
nfs_file_read+0xb7/0x140 [nfs]
vfs_read+0x2a9/0x460
ksys_read+0xb7/0x140

AI Score

6.5

Confidence

Low

SSVC

Exploitation

none

Automatable

no

Technical Impact

partial