Lucene search

K
ubuntucveUbuntu.comUB:CVE-2024-26972
HistoryMay 01, 2024 - 12:00 a.m.

CVE-2024-26972

2024-05-0100:00:00
ubuntu.com
ubuntu.com
3
linux kernel
ubifs_symlink
memleak vulnerability
encryption
inode manipulation

6.4 Medium

AI Score

Confidence

Low

0.0004 Low

EPSS

Percentile

9.1%

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ubifs:
ubifs_symlink: Fix memleak of inode->i_link in error path For error
handling path in ubifs_symlink(), inode will be marked as bad first, then
iput() is invoked. If inode->i_link is initialized by
fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() in encryption scenario, inode->i_link won’t be
freed by callchain ubifs_free_inode -> fscrypt_free_inode in error handling
path, because make_bad_inode() has changed ‘inode->i_mode’ as ‘S_IFREG’.
Following kmemleak is easy to be reproduced by injecting error in
ubifs_jnl_update() when doing symlink in encryption scenario: unreferenced
object 0xffff888103da3d98 (size 8): comm “ln”, pid 1692, jiffies 4294914701
(age 12.045s) backtrace: kmemdup+0x32/0x70
__fscrypt_encrypt_symlink+0xed/0x1c0 ubifs_symlink+0x210/0x300 [ubifs]
vfs_symlink+0x216/0x360 do_symlinkat+0x11a/0x190 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xe0
There are two ways fixing it: 1. Remove make_bad_inode() in error handling
path. We can do that because ubifs_evict_inode() will do same processes for
good symlink inode and bad symlink inode, for inode->i_nlink checking is
before is_bad_inode(). 2. Free inode->i_link before marking inode bad.
Method 2 is picked, it has less influence, personally, I think.

6.4 Medium

AI Score

Confidence

Low

0.0004 Low

EPSS

Percentile

9.1%