873 matches found
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none...
CVE-2021-3471
CVE-2021-3471 is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability entry.
CVE-2020-8376
This CVE-2020-8376 entry is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability.
CVE-2020-8364
This CVE entry is rejected/not used per the description.
account.holdsToken is never set
Email address [email protected] Handle @cmichelio Eth address 0x6823636c2462cfdcD8d33fE53fBCD0EdbE2752ad Vulnerability details The addHolding function does not update the account.holdsToken map. function addHolding CrossMarginAccount storage account, address token, uint256 depositAmount internal if...
Missing fromToken != toToken check in MarginRouter.crossSwapExactTokensForTokens/MarginRouter.crossSwapTokensForExactTokens
Email address [email protected] Handle @cmichelio Eth address 0x6823636c2462cfdcD8d33fE53fBCD0EdbE2752ad Vulnerability details Attacker calls MarginRouter.crossSwapExactTokensForTokens with a fake pair and the same token0 == tokne1. crossSwapExactTokensForTokens1000 WETH, 0, ATTACKERCONTRACT, WETH,...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none...