Voting period hardcoded to 3 blocks

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Here in the Governance contract, the voting period is locked to 3 blocks. function votingPeriod public pure override returns uint256 return 3; function votingDelay public pure override returns uint256 return 1; This is a direct bug because if we take a...

proposals view function returns wrong voting results

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. Even though, the votes are calculated correctly, the proposals view function returns wrong voting results returning forVotes results as againstVotes amount. This would negatively impact the users...

Proposal remains open to votes for only 3 blocks instead of 7 days

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact LybraGovernance contract only allows to vote during the first 3 blocks after the snapshot is taken. Assuming it takes roughly 12 seconds per 1 block on Ethereum, it is only 36 seconds to decide and vote for a proposal. This would be too fast for a regula...

User who stakes into StRSRVotes doesn't have any voting power

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact User who stakes into StRSRVotes doesn't have any voting power. This is not intuitive clear and user who thinks that he can vote, actually will not be able until he will delegate votes to himself. Proof of Concept StRSRVotes contract extends StRSR which h...

CVE-2022-48506

A flawed pseudorandom number generator in Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast Precinct ICP and ICP2 and ImageCast Evolution ICE scanners allows anyone to determine the order in which ballots were cast from public ballot-level data, allowing deanonymization of voted ballots, in several types of...

Code injection

A flawed pseudorandom number generator in Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast Precinct ICP and ICP2 and ImageCast Evolution ICE scanners allows anyone to determine the order in which ballots were cast from public ballot-level data, allowing deanonymization of voted ballots, in several types of...

PT-2023-15832 · Dominion Voting Systems · Imagecast Evolution +2

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Democracy Suite versions 5.2, 5.4-NM, 5.5, 5.5-A, 5.5-B, 5.5-C, 5.5-D, 5.7-A, 5.10, 5.10A, 5.15 Description: A flawed pseudorandom number generator in Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast Precinct ICP and ICP2 and ImageCast Evolution ICE scanner...

CVE-2022-48506

A flawed pseudorandom number generator in Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast Precinct ICP and ICP2 and ImageCast Evolution ICE scanners allows anyone to determine the order in which ballots were cast from public ballot-level data, allowing deanonymization of voted ballots, in several types of...

CVE-2022-48506

CVE-2022-48506 concerns a flawed pseudorandom number generator in Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast Precinct (ICP and ICP2) and ImageCast Evolution (ICE) scanners. The vulnerability allows deanonymization of voted ballots by deducing the order of ballot casting from public ballot-level data. Affe...

cheqd-node subject to Cosmos SDK "Barberry" vulnerability

Impact This vulnerability dubbed "Barberry" affects the Cosmos SDK framework used by cheqd-node as base. It impacts the way Cosmos SDK handles vesting accounts, and can therefore be a high-impact vulnerability for any network running the framework. There is no vulnerability in the DID/resource...

voting-station.net Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-3411813

Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...

Fairness should be denominated in mintedVotingPower rather than totalVotingPower

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Rage quitter receives too little. Proof of Concept The rage quitter receives a share votingPowerByTokenIdtokenId 1e18 / totalVotingPower of each token balance. However the sum of votingPowerByTokenIdtokenId over all tokenId, i.e. mintedVotingPower, may b...

Burning an NFT can be used to block voting

Lines of code Vulnerability details Burning an NFT can be used to block voting Impact A new validation in the accept function has been introduced in order to mitigate a potential attack to the party governance. By burning an NFT, a party member can reduce the total voting power of the party just...

Governance NFT can be burned to DoS accept()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact accept can be DoS'd by burning governance NFTs. Authorities can effectively veto proposals. Proof of Concept The new lastBurnTimestamp reverts PartyGovernance.accept if lastBurnTimestamp == block.timestamp. lastBurnTimestamp is set in...

Delegation rewards are not counted toward granting fund

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Each period reserves a reward for granting up to 3% GBC: Global Budget Constraint. The GBC is split into two parts: 1. 90% for proposal granting. Any proposal requesting more than 90% will revert. The total amount requested across winning proposals must...

It is possible to steal the unallocated part of every delegation period budget

Lines of code Vulnerability details Attacker can monitor the standard proposals distribution and routinely steal each low activity period remainder by submitting a transfer to self proposal and voting a dust amount for it. Since the criteria for the final slate update is that any increase in tota...

Extraordinary Funding proposal could be susceptible back-run

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An extraordinary proposal can be proposed, voted on, and executed within a single transaction, in the same block. As a result, an attacker with enough voting power to meet the conditions on their own could back-run a transaction to steal funds from the...

Standard voting favors proposals which ask for lower GBC

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Proposals which ask for higher % of the GBC have a serious disadvantage. Proof of Concept For simplicity, let's say there are only 3 projects in the screening stage. Project A asks for 90% GBC and projects B and C ask for 40% GBC each. Therefore, project...

VOTAB Voting Quiz PHP Script 1.0 SQL Injection

┌┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ ││ C r a C k E r ┌┘ ┌┘ T H E C R A C K O F E T E R N A L M I G H T ││ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘┘ ┌──── From The Ashes and Dust Rises An...

Zero address pauser assignment

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact By allowing any address to be assigned as the pauser, the StrategyBase contract leaves itself vulnerable to losing critical functionality that controls token transfers in and out. Assigning a zero address would result in no valid pauser, preventing the...