Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X Path Traversal Vulnerability

Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X is an intuitive and configurable face-to-face voting solution from Dominion Voting Systems.A path traversal vulnerability exists in Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X, which could be exploited by an attacker to propagate malicious code from EMS to propagate to...

Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X has an unspecified vulnerability

Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X is an intuitive and configurable face-to-face voting solution from Dominion Voting Systems.A security vulnerability exists in Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X that could be exploited by an attacker to disguise a malicious application on the device...

Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X Data Forgery Issue Vulnerability

Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X, Dominion Voting Systems' intuitive and configurable face-to-face voting solution, is vulnerable to a data forgery issue stemming from incorrect validation of password signatures, which could be exploited to install malicious code. The vulnerability can be...

Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X has an unspecified vulnerability (CNVD-2022-77551)

Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X is an intuitive and configurable face-to-face voting solution from Dominion Voting Systems.A security vulnerability exists in Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X. The vulnerability stems from a hidden feature that could be exploited by an attacker to gain...

Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X Access Control Error Vulnerability

Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X is an intuitive and configurable face-to-face voting solution from Dominion Voting Systems. of ballots...

PT-2022-3253

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X affected versions not specified Description The authentication mechanism used by voters to activate a voting session is susceptible to forgery. An attacker could leverage this issue to print an arbitrary...

PT-2022-3258

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Dominion Voting System ImageCast X affected versions not specified Description The issue is related to the manipulation of Dominion Voting System ImageCast X devices through specially crafted election definition files, allowing for arbitrary...

PT-2022-3266

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X affected versions not specified Description The authentication mechanism used by technicians on the Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X is susceptible to forgery. An attacker with physical access may use thi...

PT-2022-3264

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X affected versions not specified Description The issue is related to the authentication mechanism used by administrators of the ImageCast X device, which is associated with errors in privilege assignment. Thi...

CISA Releases Security Advisory on Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite ImageCast X

CISA has released an Industrial Controls Systems Advisory ICSA detailing vulnerabilities affecting versions of the Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite ImageCast X, which is an in-person voting system used to allow voters to mark their ballot. Exploitation of these vulnerabilities would requir...

Vulnerabilities Affecting Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X

1. SUMMARY This advisory identifies vulnerabilities affecting versions of the Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite ImageCast X, which is an in-person voting system used to allow voters to mark their ballot. The ImageCast X can be configured to allow a voter to produce a paper record or to...

Voting overwrites checkpoint.voted in last checkpoint, so users can just vote right before claiming rewards

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact if cp0.voted reward += cp0.balanceOf rewardPerTokenStored1 - rewardPerTokenStored0 / PRECISION; this line in gauge.earned function looks like the intention here is to incentivize users to keep their escrow.balanceOfNft voted for this gauge. However, it's...

Voting tokens may be lost when given to non-EOA accounts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact veNFTs may be sent to contracts that cannot handle them, and therefore all rewards and voting power, as well as the underlying are locked forever Proof of Concept The original code had the following warning: @dev Safely transfers tokenId token from from ...

Voting Escrow System could be wrapped and made useless without contract whitelisting

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Anyone could create a contract or a contract factory, say “Velo Locker" with a fonction to deposit VELO tokens through a contract, lock them and delegate the voting power to the contract owner. Then, the ownership of this contract could be sold, or the...

Increase voting power by tokenizing the address that locks the token

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Without restriction on the type of address that lock the token, a bad actor could lock the token through the smart contract. Doing so enable him to make the lockedToken becomes liquidate by tokenize his smart contract which defeat the purpose of the...

Improperly Skewed Governance Mechanism

Lines of code Vulnerability details ALR-02H: Improperly Skewed Governance Mechanism | File | Lines | Type ---|---|--- AuraLocker.sol | L594-L609, L611-L618 | Governance Susceptibility Description The balance checkpointing system exposed by the contract for governance purposes is flawed as it does...

Locking up AURA Token does not increase voting power of individual

Lines of code Vulnerability details Background Per the documentation, AURA tokens can be locked in the AuraLocker to recieve vlAURA. vlAURA is voting power in the AURA ecosystem. It is also possible for the users to delegate their voting power to a specific address by calling the...

Voting power of new validators not checked in updateValset function, Gravity.sol

Lines of code Gravity.solL276-L358 Vulnerability details Impact While the voting power of the current valset is checked when the checkValidatorSignatures function is called in updateValset, the power of the new valset is not. This could cause some functions to not work since whenever...

Admin has ability to rugpull all tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Currently it is possible for the admin to pull all tokens belonging to the Gravity bridge. In normal circumstances this is probably fine, but if the admin account were compromised this would lead to the bridge being drained of locked funds. Furthermore, ...

voting-station.net Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-2536938

Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...