EUVD-2025-22399

Malicious code in bioql PyPI...

CVE-2025-5753 Valuation Calculator <= 1.3.2 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via link Parameter

The Valuation Calculator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘link’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level...

CVE-2025-5753 Valuation Calculator <= 1.3.2 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via link Parameter

The Valuation Calculator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘link’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level...

CVE-2025-5753

CVE-2025-5753 : The WordPress plug‑in “Valuation Calculator” (Commercial Real Estate Valuation Calculator) is vulnerable to Stored Cross‑Site Scripting via the “link” parameter in all versions up to and including 1.3.2. An authenticated attacker with Contributor‑level access can inject scripts th...

WordPress plugin Valuation Calculator 跨站脚本漏洞

WordPress and WordPress plugin are both products of the WordPress Foundation.WordPress is a blogging platform developed using the PHP language. The platform supports setting up personal blog sites on servers with PHP and MySQL. WordPress plugin is an application plugin. A cross-site scripting...

PT-2025-30510 · WordPress · Valuation Calculator

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Valuation Calculator plugin for WordPress versions up to and including 1.3.2 Description: The Valuation Calculator plugin for WordPress is susceptible to Stored Cross-Site Scripting through the link parameter due to insufficient input...

Celebrating Our $1 Billion Funding Round and $12 Billion Valuation

Extending a heartfelt thanks to our customers, investors, and Wizards...

Miscalculation of OLAS Amount Due to Inaccurate LP Token Price in Specific Bonding Mechanism Scenarios

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Incorrect valuation of the LP Token price can result in either an excess issuance of OLAS Tokens, causing a loss to the protocol, or a lower issuance of OLAS Tokens, leading to losses for the user. Proof of Concept The prototype of the create function in...

Rounding Bug in OracleLibrary.consult Impacting Pricing Accuracy and User Costs

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The rounding bug in the OracleLibrary.consult function has a significant impact on applications that rely on this function for price calculations, especially those involving asset swaps, collateral valuation, or other financial transactions. The bug caus...

Usage of slot0 is extremely easy to manipulate

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Pool LP value can be manipulated and cause other users to receive less lp tokens. Proof of Concept TokenisableRange.sol uses slot0 to calculate several values in the code. slot0 is the most recent data point and is therefore extremely easy to manipulate...

GeVault#poolMatchesOracle is extemely easy to manipulate due to how it calculates underlying token balances

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact GeVaultpoolMatchesOracle uses the UniV3Pool.slot0 to determine the number of tokens it has in it's position. slot0 is the most recent data point and is therefore extremely easy to manipulate. Given that the protocol specializes in leverage, the effects o...

Wiz becomes the world’s largest cybersecurity unicorn

Just three years since its launch, Wiz becomes the world’s largest cyber unicorn and fastest SaaS company to reach a $10B valuation...

Bad debt will likely incur when multiple NFTs are liquidated.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description getUserBalanceForERC721 in GenericLogic gets the value of a user's specific ERC721 xToken. It is later used for determining the account's health factor. In case isAtomicPrice is false such as in ape NTokens, price is calculated using: uint256...

Upgraded Q -> M from 139 [1656985204675]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 139 as Medium risk. The relevant finding follows: 1. Buyouts that occur during the timestamp wrap will have valuation errors The blockTimestamp has a modulo applied, so at some point, there will be a timestamp with a value close to 2^32, followed by a timestamp...

_updateTwav() and _getTwav() will revert when cumulativePrice overflows

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Contract will break when cumulativeValuation overflows. PoC Cumulative prices are designed to work with overflows/underflows because in the end the difference is important. In updateTwav when prevCumulativeValuation + valuation timeElapsed overflows the...

Ineffective TWAV Implementation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Background The current TWAV implementation consists of an array of 4 observations/valuations called twavObservations. Whenever, the new valuation is updated, the new cumulative valuation will be appended to the twavObservations array and the oldest...

Buys/sells will be front-run by MEV bots

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Since the value of the vault depends on the Bancor formula, it's important that transactions can't be front-run, because doing so, even for small amounts, will change the valuation price for subsequent buys/sells. The link the sponsor provided describes...

Issue with TWAV calculation.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact To calculate time weighted average value, current valuation is used. This is not appropriate way to decide the TWAV while other locations considers only time. This might not be the stable one. Proof of Concept uint256 currentValuation =...

NFTPairWithOracle's _lend ignores accepted.oracle and allows to start loan with empty params.oracle

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact As lend doesn't require params.oracle to be valid, while removeCollateral does, the loan initiation with an empty oracle can lead to ignoring collateral valuation. As the deals are OTC this can be seen as lender decision. However, lend ignores...

[WP-H13] LockPosition can be overwritten by new lockFor() which leads to user's funds loss

Lines of code Vulnerability details function lockFor address account, uint256 nftIndex, uint256 lockAmount external onlyOwner nonReentrant jpeg.safeTransferFromaccount, addressthis, lockAmount; positionsnftIndex = LockPosition owner: account, unlockAt: block.timestamp + lockTime, lockAmount:...