CVE-2020-5219

Angular Expressions before version 1.0.1 has a remote code execution vulnerability if you call expressions.compileuserControlledInput where userControlledInput is text that comes from user input. If running angular-expressions in the browser, an attacker could run any browser script when the...

Remote code execution

Angular Expressions before version 1.0.1 has a remote code execution vulnerability if you call expressions.compileuserControlledInput where userControlledInput is text that comes from user input. If running angular-expressions in the browser, an attacker could run any browser script when the...

Remote Code Execution in Angular Expressions

Impact The vulnerability, reported by GoSecure Inc, allows Remote Code Execution, if you call expressions.compileuserControlledInput where userControlledInput is text that comes from user input. If running angular-expressions in the browser, an attacker could run any browser script when the...

GHSA-HXHM-96PP-2M43 Remote Code Execution in Angular Expressions

Impact The vulnerability, reported by GoSecure Inc, allows Remote Code Execution, if you call expressions.compileuserControlledInput where userControlledInput is text that comes from user input. If running angular-expressions in the browser, an attacker could run any browser script when the...

CVE-2020-5216 Limited header injection when using dynamic overrides with user input in RubyGems secure_headers

In Secure Headers RubyGem secureheaders, a directive injection vulnerability is present in versions before 3.9.0, 5.2.0, and 6.3.0. If user-supplied input was passed into append/overridecontentsecuritypolicydirectives, a newline could be injected leading to limited header injection. Upon seeing a...

GHSA-XQ52-RV6W-397C Directive injection when using dynamic overrides with user input

Impact If user-supplied input was passed into append/overridecontentsecuritypolicydirectives, a semicolon could be injected leading to directive injection. This could be used to e.g. override a script-src directive. Duplicate directives are ignored and the first one wins. The directives in...

Directive injection when using dynamic overrides with user input

Impact If user-supplied input was passed into append/overridecontentsecuritypolicydirectives, a semicolon could be injected leading to directive injection. This could be used to e.g. override a script-src directive. Duplicate directives are ignored and the first one wins. The directives in...

GHSA-W978-RMPF-QMWG Limited header injection when using dynamic overrides with user input in RubyGems secure_headers

Impact If user-supplied input was passed into append/overridecontentsecuritypolicydirectives, a newline could be injected leading to limited header injection. Upon seeing a newline in the header, rails will silently create a new Content-Security-Policy header with the remaining value of the...

CVE-2020-5217 Directive injection when using dynamic overrides with user input in RubyGems secure_headers

In Secure Headers RubyGem secureheaders, a directive injection vulnerability is present in versions before 3.8.0, 5.1.0, and 6.2.0. If user-supplied input was passed into append/overridecontentsecuritypolicydirectives, a semicolon could be injected leading to directive injection. This could be us...

CVE-2020-5217

In Secure Headers RubyGem secureheaders, a directive injection vulnerability is present in versions before 3.8.0, 5.1.0, and 6.2.0. If user-supplied input was passed into append/overridecontentsecuritypolicydirectives, a semicolon could be injected leading to directive injection. This could be us...

secure_headers directive injection using semicolon

If user-supplied input was passed into append/overridecontentsecuritypolicydirectives, a semicolon could be injected leading to directive injection. This could be used to e.g. override a script-src directive. Duplicate directives are ignored and the first one wins. The directives in secureheaders...

Cisco Jabber Guest Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Jabber Guest could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting XSS attack against a user of the web-based management interface of an affected device. The vulnerability exists because the web-based...

Cisco Web Security Appliance and Cisco Content Security Management Appliance HTTP Header Injection Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the API Framework of Cisco AsyncOS for Cisco Web Security Appliance WSA and Cisco Content Security Management Appliance SMA could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to inject crafted HTTP headers in the web server's response. The vulnerability is due to insufficient...

Cisco Small Business Smart and Managed Switches Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business Smart and Managed Switches could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting XSS attack against a user of the interface. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-suppli...

CVE-2019-10780

BibTeX-ruby before 5.1.0 allows shell command injection due to unsanitized user input being passed directly to the built-in Ruby Kernel.open method through BibTeX.open...

CVE-2019-10780

BibTeX-ruby before 5.1.0 allows shell command injection due to unsanitized user input being passed directly to the built-in Ruby Kernel.open method through BibTeX.open...

Command injection

BibTeX-ruby before 5.1.0 allows shell command injection due to unsanitized user input being passed directly to the built-in Ruby Kernel.open method through BibTeX.open...

CVE-2019-10780

CVE-2019-10780 affects BibTeX-Ruby prior to 5.1.0. The vulnerability arises when untrusted input is passed directly to the built-in Ruby Kernel.open via BibTeX.open, enabling OS command injection. Multiple sources (Red Hat, GitHub advisories, OSV/Veracode, NVD) corroborate the issue and its descr...

GHSA-8WX2-9Q48-VM9R RFD attack via Content-Disposition header sourced from request input by Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux Application

In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3, versions 5.1.x prior to 5.1.13, and versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.16, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download RFD attack when it sets a "Content-Disposition" header in the response where the filename attribute is derived from use...

CVE-2019-14023

String format issue will occur while processing HLOS data as there is no user input validation to ensure inputs are properly NULL terminated before string copy in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music in MDM9607, Nicobar,...