Lucene search
+L

13899 matches found

CVE
CVE
•added 2026/10/21 11:45 a.m.•15 views

CVE-2026-74755

Apache bRPC (versions prior to 1.18.0 ) is vulnerable to a Denial of Service due to an integer underflow in the mcpack2pb component. The UnparsedValue::as_string() function in src/mcpack2pb/parser.cpp fails to validate the value_size of string fields from network data; when the size is 0, the cal...

5.9AI score0.00202EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2026/10/21 11:37 a.m.•10 views

CVE-2026-56386 Apache bRPC: Integer Underflow and Out-of-Bounds Read in HTTP/2 DATA Frame Parser

Integer underflow and out-of-bounds read in the HTTP/2 server DATA frame parser in Apache bRPC allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause denial of service by sending a malformed DATA frame with the PADDED flag set and a zero-length payload. Root Cause: The HTTP/2 DATA frame handler...

5.8AI score0.00732EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/10/21 11:37 a.m.•9 views

EUVD-2026-107172

Integer underflow and out-of-bounds read in the HTTP/2 server DATA frame parser in Apache bRPC allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause denial of service by sending a malformed DATA frame with the PADDED flag set and a zero-length payload. Root Cause: The HTTP/2 DATA frame handler...

7.5CVSS5.8AI score0.00732EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/10/21 11:37 a.m.•23 views

CVE-2026-56386 Apache bRPC: Integer Underflow and Out-of-Bounds Read in HTTP/2 DATA Frame Parser

Integer underflow and out-of-bounds read in the HTTP/2 server DATA frame parser in Apache bRPC allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause denial of service by sending a malformed DATA frame with the PADDED flag set and a zero-length payload. Root Cause: The HTTP/2 DATA frame handler...

0.00732EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/10/21 11:37 a.m.•22 views

CVE-2026-56386

The Apache bRPC HTTP/2 server DATA frame parser is vulnerable to an integer underflow and out-of-bounds read . The issue arises because the handler decrements the fragment size when the PADDED flag is set before verifying the presence of the mandatory pad length byte. An unauthenticated remote at...

7.5CVSS5.8AI score0.00732EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/10/21 8:16 a.m.•6 views

CVE-2026-111075

In Eclipse OpenJ9 versions prior to 0.63.0, the JITServer component fails to perform cross-field validation on attacker-controlled size, paddingSize, and dataOffset fields during DataDescriptor message deserialization. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a crafted network payload that...

8.7CVSS0.00372EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/10/21 8:00 a.m.•21 views

CVE-2026-111075 JITServer: Pre-authentication remote crash via integer underflow and out-of-bounds heap read in DataDescriptor deserialization

In Eclipse OpenJ9 versions prior to 0.63.0, the JITServer component fails to perform cross-field validation on attacker-controlled size, paddingSize, and dataOffset fields during DataDescriptor message deserialization. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a crafted network payload that...

8.7CVSS0.00372EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/10/21 8:00 a.m.•8 views

EUVD-2026-107138

In Eclipse OpenJ9 versions prior to 0.63.0, the JITServer component fails to perform cross-field validation on attacker-controlled size, paddingSize, and dataOffset fields during DataDescriptor message deserialization. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a crafted network payload that...

8.7CVSS5.9AI score0.00372EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/10/21 8:00 a.m.•8 views

CVE-2026-111075

In Eclipse OpenJ9 versions prior to 0.63.0 , a vulnerability exists in the JITServer component due to missing cross-field validation on _size, _paddingSize, and _dataOffset fields during DataDescriptor message deserialization. An unauthenticated remote attacker can provide a crafted network paylo...

8.7CVSS5.8AI score0.00372EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/10/21 1:17 a.m.•13 views

CVE-2026-114118

Vyper 0.3.4 through 0.5.0b1 computes the remaining blueprint size in createfromblueprint by uint256 subtraction without first checking that codeoffset is below the blueprint's code size, so a huge offset wraps to a small positive value. An attacker controlling codeoffset can make a factory deploy...

6.3CVSS0.00201EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/10/21 1:17 a.m.•5 views

CVE-2020-37288

Vyper from 0.1.0b10 before 0.2.3 generates incorrect code for a return statement inside a for loop in an internal function called two or more internal calls deep, producing an invalid jump destination stack underflow. Affected contracts revert such calls unnecessarily, which in limited...

6.3CVSS0.00284EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/10/21 12:37 a.m.•9 views

EUVD-2026-106921

Vyper 0.3.4 through 0.5.0b1 computes the remaining blueprint size in createfromblueprint by uint256 subtraction without first checking that codeoffset is below the blueprint's code size, so a huge offset wraps to a small positive value. An attacker controlling codeoffset can make a factory deploy...

6.3CVSS6AI score0.00201EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Mend
Mend
•added 2026/10/21 12:37 a.m.•6 views

CVE-2026-114118

Vyper 0.3.4 through 0.5.0b1 computes the remaining blueprint size in createfromblueprint by uint256 subtraction without first checking that codeoffset is below the blueprint's code size, so a huge offset wraps to a small positive value. An attacker controlling codeoffset can make a factory deploy...

6.3CVSS5.9AI score0.00201EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/10/21 12:36 a.m.•19 views

CVE-2020-37288 Vyper 0.1.0b10 before 0.2.3 Invalid Jump Destination via Return in Nested Loops

Vyper from 0.1.0b10 before 0.2.3 generates incorrect code for a return statement inside a for loop in an internal function called two or more internal calls deep, producing an invalid jump destination stack underflow. Affected contracts revert such calls unnecessarily, which in limited...

6.3CVSS0.00284EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/10/21 12:36 a.m.•6 views

EUVD-2020-31284

Vyper from 0.1.0b10 before 0.2.3 generates incorrect code for a return statement inside a for loop in an internal function called two or more internal calls deep, producing an invalid jump destination stack underflow. Affected contracts revert such calls unnecessarily, which in limited...

6.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00284EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Mend
Mend
•added 2026/10/21 12:36 a.m.•4 views

CVE-2020-37288

Vyper from 0.1.0b10 before 0.2.3 generates incorrect code for a return statement inside a for loop in an internal function called two or more internal calls deep, producing an invalid jump destination stack underflow. Affected contracts revert such calls unnecessarily, which in limited...

6.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00284EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/10/21 12:36 a.m.•8 views

CVE-2020-37288

Vyper versions 0.1.0b10 before 0.2.3 are vulnerable to an invalid jump destination caused by a stack underflow . This occurs when a return statement is used inside a for loop within an internal function that is called two or more internal calls deep. The compiler generates incorrect code for thes...

6.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00284EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2026/10/21 12:36 a.m.•3 views

CVE-2020-37288 Vyper 0.1.0b10 before 0.2.3 Invalid Jump Destination via Return in Nested Loops

Vyper from 0.1.0b10 before 0.2.3 generates incorrect code for a return statement inside a for loop in an internal function called two or more internal calls deep, producing an invalid jump destination stack underflow. Affected contracts revert such calls unnecessarily, which in limited...

6.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00284EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2026/10/21 12:00 a.m.•6 views

PT-2026-120157

Vyper from 0.1.0b10 before 0.2.3 generates incorrect code for a return statement inside a for loop in an internal function called two or more internal calls deep, producing an invalid jump destination stack underflow. Affected contracts revert such calls unnecessarily, which in limited...

6.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00284EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2026/10/21 12:00 a.m.•11 views

PT-2026-120494

In Eclipse OpenJ9 versions prior to 0.63.0, the JITServer component fails to perform cross-field validation on attacker-controlled size, paddingSize, and dataOffset fields during DataDescriptor message deserialization. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a crafted network payload that...

8.7CVSS5.9AI score0.00372EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Rows per page
Query Builder