Lucene search
+L

41 matches found

Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/01/31 12:00 a.m.16 views

Anyone can transfer any tokens balance of Payment contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Anyone can transfer any tokens balance of Payment contract Proof of Concept 1. Someone send some tokens to Payment contract 2. Attacker will call sweepToken with token = token address, amountMinimum = Token balance of Payment contract and recipient = any...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/10/29 12:00 a.m.24 views

arbitrary send erc20 safeTransferFrom

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact uses arbitrary from in safeTransferFrom when msg.sender is not used as from in safeTransferFrom. Proof of Concept Alice approves this contract to spend her ERC20 tokens. Bob can call a and specify Alice's address as the from parameter in safeTransferFrom...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/10/12 12:00 a.m.34 views

transferfrom with arbitrary from address allows attackers to receive tokens in L2 without paying

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In , the line token.transferFromfrom, escrow, amount; use an arbitrary from address. So an attacker can deposit victim's GTR token on L1, by using from address as victim's address, and receive equivalent tokens on L2 on attacker address. Proof of Concept...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/06/19 12:00 a.m.11 views

matchOneToManyOrders doesn't consider numItems of the orders

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An order can specify a numItems in MakerOrder.constraints0. This number is the min/max number of items the order wants to buy/sell. For example a buy order can provide a list of nfts and say that wants to buy only 3 of them from that list. The function...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
HackRead
HackRead
added 2022/04/14 9:04 p.m.17 views

Rarible NFT Market Vulnerability Authorized Attackers to Transfer Crypto Assets

By Deeba Ahmed The vulnerability could allow attackers to steal crypto and NFT tokens in a single transaction if exploited. Check… This is a post from HackRead.com Read the original post: Rarible NFT Market Vulnerability Authorized Attackers to Transfer Crypto Assets...

4.2AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/02/17 12:00 a.m.12 views

Tokens are directly transferred from briber to BribeVault

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function depositBribeERC20 in BribeVault transfers tokens directly from the briber: // Since this method is called by a depositor contract, we must transfer from the account // that called the depositor contract - amount must be approved beforehand...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
OSV
OSV
added 2022/01/26 6:15 p.m.24 views

CVE-2021-46561

controller/org.controller/org.controller.js in the CVE Services API 1.1.1 before 5c50baf3bda28133a3bc90b854765a64fb538304 allows an organizational administrator to transfer a user account to an arbitrary new organization, and thereby achieve unintended access within the context of that new...

7.2CVSS7.1AI score0.00836EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2021/12/22 12:00 a.m.10 views

'wrap' tokens that you are not entitled to

Handle pauliax Vulnerability details Impact function wrap can be called by anyone. It accepts arbitrary from and to, and transfers 'from', and mints 'to'. A malicious actor can transfer from other users that have approved the contract before, e.g. an EOA user will need to execute 2 txs: first,...

7.3AI score
SaveExploits0
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2021/10/12 2:03 p.m.39 views

CVE-2021-38178

The software logistics system of SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP and ABAP Platform versions - 700, 701, 702, 710, 730, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756, enables a malicious user to transfer ABAP code artifacts or content, by-passing the established quality gates. By this vulnerability malicious...

8.9AI score0.01294EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2021/05/19 12:00 a.m.20 views

delegatedTransferERC20() on line 442 of Visor.sol, able to get locked erc20 tokens

Handle Sherlock Vulnerability details Impact Because of getBalanceLocked not returning the full sum of the balances, if you have the approval you are able to transfer locked erc20 tokens. Proof of Concept Tools Used Hardhat Recommended Mitigation Steps Calculate balance using balance.add...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
CNVD
CNVD
added 2020/05/06 12:00 a.m.1 views

Logic Flaw Vulnerability in FuturXE

FuturXE FXE is an ethereum-based virtual currency.A security vulnerability exists in the 'transferFrom' function in FXE's smart contract implementation, which stems from a logic error in the program. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability to make an unauthorized transfer of digital assets...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
ATTACKERKB
ATTACKERKB
added 2020/01/31 12:15 a.m.5 views

CVE-2020-5232

A user who owns an ENS domain can set a trapdoor, allowing them to transfer ownership to another user, and later regain ownership without the new owners consent or awareness. A new ENS deployment is being rolled out that fixes this vulnerability in the ENS registry...

8.7CVSS8AI score0.01181EPSS
SaveExploits0References3Affected Software1
Hacker One
Hacker One
added 2018/10/01 5:47 p.m.21 views

Shopify: H1514 CSRF in Domain transfer allows adding your domain to other user's account

Summary: Shopify allows users to buy their own domain from the Shopify system. One of the facility on this is that if you buy the domain through Shopify, you can do an inter-store transfers. This means: You can only transfer your domain to a Shopify store owned by you. It can take up to 24 hours ...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Prion
Prion
added 2018/08/10 3:29 p.m.22 views

Code injection

The transferProxy and approveProxy functions of a smart contract implementation for SmartMesh SMT, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allow attackers to accomplish an unauthorized transfer of digital assets because replay attacks can occur with the same-named functions with the same signatures in other...

5CVSS7.4AI score0.01202EPSS
SaveExploits1References2
NVD
NVD
added 2018/08/10 3:29 p.m.21 views

CVE-2018-10769

The transferProxy and approveProxy functions of a smart contract implementation for SmartMesh SMT, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allow attackers to accomplish an unauthorized transfer of digital assets because replay attacks can occur with the same-named functions with the same signatures in other...

7.5CVSS7.5AI score0.01202EPSS
SaveExploits1References2
CVE
CVE
added 2018/08/10 3:00 p.m.71 views

CVE-2018-10769

Summary (CVE-2018-10769): The SmartMesh (SMT) smart contract’s transferProxy and approveProxy functions are vulnerable to replay attacks, allowing unauthorized transfers of digital assets. The issue arises because the same-named functions (with identical signatures) exist in other tokens (First, ...

7.5CVSS7.4AI score0.01202EPSS
SaveExploits1References2Affected Software1
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2018/08/10 3:00 p.m.26 views

CVE-2018-10769

The transferProxy and approveProxy functions of a smart contract implementation for SmartMesh SMT, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allow attackers to accomplish an unauthorized transfer of digital assets because replay attacks can occur with the same-named functions with the same signatures in other...

7.5AI score0.01202EPSS
SaveExploits1References2
NVD
NVD
added 2018/06/11 10:29 a.m.20 views

CVE-2018-12025

The transferFrom function of a smart contract implementation for FuturXE FXE, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows attackers to accomplish an unauthorized transfer of digital assets because of a logic error. The developer messed up with the boolean judgment - if the input value is smaller than or equa...

7.5CVSS7.5AI score0.01606EPSS
SaveExploits1References1
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2018/06/11 10:00 a.m.31 views

CVE-2018-12025

The transferFrom function of a smart contract implementation for FuturXE FXE, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows attackers to accomplish an unauthorized transfer of digital assets because of a logic error. The developer messed up with the boolean judgment - if the input value is smaller than or equa...

7.5AI score0.01606EPSS
SaveExploits1References1
CVE
CVE
added 2018/06/11 10:00 a.m.75 views

CVE-2018-12025

The CVE-2018-12025 entry concerns FuturXE (FXE) ERC20 token. Connected sources provide concrete details: transferFrom is vulnerable due to a logic error in the allowance check—the condition if (allowed[from][msg.sender] >= value) return false misorders the logic, allowing an underflow on allow...

7.5CVSS7.5AI score0.01606EPSS
SaveExploits1References1Affected Software1
Rows per page
Query Builder