Missing Check When Transferring Tokens Out For A Given Promotion

Handle leastwood Vulnerability details Impact The claimRewards function is called upon by ticket holders who parse a set of epochIds they wish to claim rewards on. An internal call is made to calculateRewardAmount to calculate the correct reward amount owed to the user. Subsequently, the...

Tokens with fee on transfer are not supported

Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details There are ERC20 tokens that charge fee for every transfer or transferFrom. In the current implementation, createPromotion assumes that the received amount is the same as the transfer amount, and uses it to calculate reward amounts. As a result, in claimReward...

TwabRewards: fee on transfer token as promotion token will block at least one epoch reward claim

Handle GiveMeTestEther Vulnerability details Impact If the promotion token applies transfer fees, the total amount to claim will be less than "tokensPerEpoch numberOfEpochs" bcs a part of this amount is the fee = funds + fee, but only the "funds" can be withdrawn but the calculation in...

getRewardsAmount doesn't check epochs haven't been claimed

Handle harleythedog Vulnerability details Impact In ITwabRewards.sol, it is claimed that getRewardsAmount should account for epochs that have already been claimed, and not include these epochs in the total amount indeed, there is a line that says @dev Will be 0 if user has already claimed rewards...

GHSA-WX5J-54MM-RQQQ HTTP request smuggling in netty

Impact Netty currently just skips control chars when these are present at the beginning / end of the header name. We should better fail fast as these are not allowed by the spec and could lead to HTTP request smuggling. Failing to do the validation might cause netty to "sanitize" header names...

CVE-2021-42110

An issue was discovered in Allegro Windows formerly Popsy Windows before 3.3.4156.1. A standard user can escalate privileges to SYSTEM if the FTP module is installed, because of DLL hijacking...

ERC20Vault does not support fee-on-transfer token

Handle gzeon Vulnerability details Impact ERC20Vault does not support fee-on-transfer token since it does not check the balance received by the contract. Proof of Concept for uint256 i = 0; i 0 IERC20tokensi.safeTransferFromfrom, addressthis, tokenAmountsi; actualTokenAmounts = pushtokens,...

ChiefTrader.sol Wrong implementation of swapExactInput() and swapExactOutput()

Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details When a caller calls ChiefTrader.solswapExactInput, it will call ITradertraderAddress.swapExactInput. return ITradertraderAddress.swapExactInput0, amount, recipient, path, options; However, in the current implementation, inputToken is not approved to the...

Unlimited allowances let anyone move funds to child vaults

Handle 0x0x0x Vulnerability details A malicious attacker can move someones funds between their vaults, since max allowances are given. As a consequence, a malicious user can block activities such as reclaimTokens. Although, funds are not directly stolen, it is possible to revert transactions of...

Fortinet FortiOS 缓冲区错误漏洞

Fortinet FortiOS is a set of security operating system dedicated to FortiGate network security platform from American Fita Fortinet. The system provides users with firewall, antivirus, IPSec/SSLVPN, Web content filtering and anti-spam and other security features. A security vulnerability exists i...

_swapExactOutputSingle() and _swapExactOutputMultihop() May Fail When Transfer Token to recipient

Handle Meta0xNull Vulnerability details Impact IERC20input.safeTransferFromaddressthis, recipient, options.limitAmount - amountIn; For safeTransferFrom to work it needs to have an enough approval. In this case, obviously this contract does not approve every recipient when Transfer Token, so we ca...

SolarWinds Serv-U FTP Server 服务器 跨站请求伪造漏洞

SolarWinds Serv-U FTP Server is a suite of FTP and MFT file transfer software from SolarWinds, Inc. in the United States. A security vulnerability exists in Serv-U Server that stems from the Serv-U Server responding with a valid CSRFToken when a request contains only a Session...

This protocol doesn't support all fee on transfer tokens

Handle 0x0x0x Vulnerability details Some fee on transfer tokens, do not reduce the fee directly from the transferred amount, but subtracts it from remaining balance of sender. Some tokens prefer this approach, to make the amount received by the recipient an exact amount. Therefore, after funds ar...

Locke.sol:Stream - possible DOS on arbitraryCall

Handle ScopeLift Vulnerability details Impact If there's an airdrop that arbitraryCall would like to call, it could be DOSed by first calling createIncentive with the airdropped token, then backrunning calls to claimIncentive with calls to createIncentive. Proof of Concept Tools Used Recommended...

Undesired tokens can be called

Handle 0x1f8b Vulnerability details Impact Possible call to unwanted tokens. Proof of Concept In the method reclaimTokens of Vault contract it was called tranfer to tokens provided by the caller, but maybe these tokens are not allowed by the governance, it must be checked that isAllowedTokenaddre...

[SECURITY] Fedora 35 Update: containerd-1.5.8-1.fc35

Containerd is an industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability. It is available as a daemon for Linux and Windows, which can manage the complete container lifecycle of its host system: image transfer and storage, container execution and supervision...

[SECURITY] Fedora 34 Update: containerd-1.5.8-1.fc34

Containerd is an industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability. It is available as a daemon for Linux and Windows, which can manage the complete container lifecycle of its host system: image transfer and storage, container execution and supervision...

AbstractRewardMine - Re-entrancy attack during withdrawal

Handle ScopeLift Vulnerability details Impact The internal withdraw method does not follow the checks-effects-interactions pattern. A malicious token, or one that implemented transfer hooks, could re-enter the public calling function such as withdraw before proper internal accounting was complete...

Unable to remove liquidity in Recovery Mode

Handle gzeon Vulnerability details Impact According to When the Malt price TWAP drops below a specified threshold eg 2% below peg then the protocol will revert any transaction that tries to remove Malt from the AMM pool ie buying Malt or removing liquidity. Users wanting to remove liquidity can...

Bonding doesn't work with fee-on transfer tokens

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details Certain ERC20 tokens make modifications to their ERC20's transfer or balanceOf functions. One type of these tokens is deflationary tokens that charge a certain fee for every transfer or transferFrom. Impact The Bonding.bond function will revert in the...