6 matches found
Astra Linux – Vulnerability in Linux 5.10
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ipa: Fixed the issue where the event ring index was not properly programmed for IPA v5.0+. For IPA v5.0+ onwards, the event ring index field has been moved from CHCCNTXT0 to CHCCNTXT1. In IPA v5.0, this field was intended to...
SUSE CVE-2026-43345
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ipa: fix event ring index not programmed for IPA v5.0+ For IPA v5.0+, the event ring index field moved from CHCCNTXT0 to CHCCNTXT1. The v5.0 register definition intended to define this field in the CHCCNTXT1 fmask array but...
CVE-2026-43345
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's ipa driver. This vulnerability, affecting IPA version 5.0 and later, stems from an incorrect event ring index programming, preventing GSI channels from signaling transfer completions. As a result, the system can experience hangs during operations such as...
CVE-2026-43345 net: ipa: fix event ring index not programmed for IPA v5.0+
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ipa: fix event ring index not programmed for IPA v5.0+ For IPA v5.0+, the event ring index field moved from CHCCNTXT0 to CHCCNTXT1. The v5.0 register definition intended to define this field in the CHCCNTXT1 fmask array but...
CVE-2026-43345
Summary: The CVE concerns the Linux kernel IPA driver. For IPA v5.0+, the event ring index field moved from CH_C_CNTXT_0 to CH_C_CNTXT_1. The register definition intended to define this field in CH_C_CNTXT_1 but used the old identifier ERINDEX instead of CH_ERINDEX, causing an incorrect event rin...
CVE-2026-43345 net: ipa: fix event ring index not programmed for IPA v5.0+
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ipa: fix event ring index not programmed for IPA v5.0+ For IPA v5.0+, the event ring index field moved from CHCCNTXT0 to CHCCNTXT1. The v5.0 register definition intended to define this field in the CHCCNTXT1 fmask array but...