Lucene search
+L

36 matches found

Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/09/16 6:30 a.m.•26 views

CVE-2026-84906 Eventin < 4.1.24 - Unauthenticated Payment Bypass via Stripe and PayPal Cross-Order Transaction Replay

The Eventin WordPress plugin before 4.1.24 does not verify that a completed payment corresponds to the order it is applied to, confirming only that the payment gateway reports the transaction as successful, not its amount, currency, or which order it belongs to, allowing unauthenticated visitors ...

5.3CVSS0.00158EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2026/09/16 6:30 a.m.•14 views

CVE-2026-84906 Eventin < 4.1.24 - Unauthenticated Payment Bypass via Stripe and PayPal Cross-Order Transaction Replay

The Eventin WordPress plugin before 4.1.24 does not verify that a completed payment corresponds to the order it is applied to, confirming only that the payment gateway reports the transaction as successful, not its amount, currency, or which order it belongs to, allowing unauthenticated visitors ...

5.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00158EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/09/16 6:30 a.m.•23 views

CVE-2026-84906

Eventin WordPress plugin versions before 4.1.24 contain an unauthenticated payment bypass affecting its Stripe and PayPal integrations. The plugin fails to verify that a completed payment corresponds to the specific order it is applied to, checking only that the gateway reports the transaction as...

5.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00158EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2026/09/16 12:00 a.m.•3 views

CVE-2026-84906: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

The Eventin WordPress plugin before 4.1.24 does not verify that a completed payment corresponds to the order it is applied to, confirming only that the payment gateway reports the transaction as successful, not its amount, currency, or which order it belongs to, allowing unauthenticated visitors ...

5.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00158EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/08/26 8:17 p.m.•11 views

CVE-2026-46369

Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Through 1.5.0, the validity store uses a strict lower-bound comparison that expires a stored transaction too early relative to Transaction::isvalidat, allowing a remote attacker to repl...

7.5CVSS0.00549EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/08/26 7:32 p.m.•13 views

EUVD-2026-66705

Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Through 1.5.0, the validity store uses a strict lower-bound comparison that expires a stored transaction too early relative to Transaction::isvalidat, allowing a remote attacker to repl...

7.5CVSS5.4AI score0.00549EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/08/26 7:32 p.m.•39 views

CVE-2026-46369 Nimiq: Validity store off by one error

Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Through 1.5.0, the validity store uses a strict lower-bound comparison that expires a stored transaction too early relative to Transaction::isvalidat, allowing a remote attacker to repl...

7.5CVSS0.00549EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2026/08/26 7:32 p.m.•9 views

CVE-2026-46369 Nimiq: Validity store off by one error

Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Through 1.5.0, the validity store uses a strict lower-bound comparison that expires a stored transaction too early relative to Transaction::isvalidat, allowing a remote attacker to repl...

7.5CVSS5.4AI score0.00549EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/08/26 7:32 p.m.•36 views

CVE-2026-46369

Nimiq (Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol, Albatross consensus) is affected by an off-by-one error in its validity store through version 1.5.0 . The store uses a strict lower-bound comparison that expires a stored transaction one block too early relative to Transaction::is_v...

7.5CVSS5.4AI score0.00549EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
OSV
OSV
•added 2026/08/26 7:32 p.m.•14 views

CVE-2026-46369 Nimiq: Validity store off by one error

Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Through 1.5.0, the validity store uses a strict lower-bound comparison that expires a stored transaction too early relative to Transaction::isvalidat, allowing a remote attacker to repl...

7.5CVSS5.6AI score
SaveExploits0References5
OSV
OSV
•added 2026/08/12 3:16 p.m.•12 views

GHSA-3763-QP59-59VF nimiq-blockchain: Validity store off by one error

Impact The validity store treats a transaction with stored blocknumber = X as "in window" only when X lastbn - transactionvaliditywindowblocks strict inequality. However the protocol's Transaction::isvalidat accepts a transaction for inclusion in any block in validitystartheight - blocksperbatch,...

7.5CVSS5.4AI score0.00549EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2026/08/12 12:00 a.m.•22 views

PT-2026-76559

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Nimiq versions prior to 1.5.1 Description The validity store uses a strict lower-bound comparison that expires stored transactions too early relative to the Transaction::is valid at function. This occurs because the store treats a transaction...

7.5CVSS5.4AI score0.00549EPSS
SaveExploits0References6
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2025/10/03 8:07 p.m.•11 views

EUVD-2022-1247

Malicious code in bioql PyPI...

7.5CVSS7.5AI score0.01309EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2025/10/03 8:07 p.m.•16 views

EUVD-2022-0930

Malicious code in bioql PyPI...

7.5CVSS7.4AI score0.01147EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
•added 2025/05/22 6:26 p.m.•16 views

CVE-2021-25835

Cosmos Network Ethermint = v0.4.0 is affected by a cross-chain transaction replay vulnerability in the EVM module. Since ethermint uses the same chainIDEpoch and signature schemes with ethereum for compatibility, a verified signature in ethereum is still valid in ethermint with the same msg conte...

7.5CVSS6.8AI score0.01309EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
•added 2025/05/22 6:26 p.m.•20 views

CVE-2021-25834

Cosmos Network Ethermint = v0.4.0 is affected by a transaction replay vulnerability in the EVM module. If the victim sends a very large nonce transaction, the attacker can replay the transaction through the application...

7.5CVSS6.7AI score0.01147EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Veracode
Veracode
•added 2024/10/18 5:50 a.m.•16 views

Transaction Replay Attack

github.com/cosmos/ethermint is vulnerable to Transaction Replay Attack. The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the EVM module where, if the victim sends a very large nonce transaction, the attacker can replay the transaction through the application...

7.5CVSS6.5AI score0.01147EPSS
SaveExploits0References4Affected Software1
UbuntuCve
UbuntuCve
•added 2024/04/25 6:15 a.m.•37 views

CVE-2024-26925

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nftables: release mutex after nftgcseqend from abort path The commit mutex should not be released during the critical section between nftgcseqbegin and nftgcseqend, otherwise, async GC worker could collect expired...

7.8CVSS6.4AI score0.00267EPSS
SaveExploits0References30
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2024/04/24 9:49 p.m.•42 views

CVE-2024-26925 netfilter: nf_tables: release mutex after nft_gc_seq_end from abort path

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nftables: release mutex after nftgcseqend from abort path The commit mutex should not be released during the critical section between nftgcseqbegin and nftgcseqend, otherwise, async GC worker could collect expired...

7.8CVSS7.7AI score0.00267EPSS
SaveExploits0References7
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2023/10/20 12:00 a.m.•45 views

Cross-Chain Signature Replay Attack

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact 1. User operations can be replayed on smart accounts accross different chains. This can lead to user's loosing funds or any unexpected behaviour that transaction replay attacks usually lead to. 2. Mistakes made on one chain can be re-applied to a new...

7.2AI score
SaveExploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder