2434 matches found
TFTPlunder
TFTPlunder: an exploit for CVE-2023-29930 This is an exploit script for a blind file read / write vulnerability in the Genesys formerly InIn TFTP provisioning server. Vulnerability info This vulnerability is due to unrestricted configuration options for the TFTP root path and file extensions. In...
iCULeak.py
iCULeak.py Tool to find and extract credentials from phone configuration files in environments managed by Cisco's CUCM Call Manager. When using Cisco's CUCM Call Manager, phone configuration files are stored on a TFTP server. These VoIP phone configuration files quite frequently contain sensitive...
CVE-2023-33669
CVE-2023-33669 Exploit Exploit for a stack overflow vulnerability in the Tenda AC8 router, specifically targeting firmware version USAC8V4.0siV16.03.34.06. Official product page. Emulation You can put 'prepare.sh' file in root directory of firmware and execute it. Also for RCE you have to setup...
cve-2006-6184
CVE-2006-6184 This is a python-based standalone exploit for CVE-2006-6184. This exploit triggers a stack-based buffer overflow in Allied Telesyn TFTP Server AT-TFTP 1.9, and possibly earlier, allowing remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code. Instructions Updated fo...
dotdotpwn
ОПИСАНИЕ DotDotPwn - Фаззер для обхода каталогов Это очень гибкий интеллектуальный фаззер для обнаружения уязвимостей обхода каталогов в программном обеспечении, таком как HTTP/FTP/TFTP серверы, веб-платформы вроде CMS, ERP, блогов и т.д. Также он имеет независимый от протокола модуль для отправк...
dotdotpwn
DESCRIPTION DotDotPwn - The Directory Traversal Fuzzer It's a very flexible intelligent fuzzer to discover traversal directory vulnerabilities in software such as HTTP/FTP/TFTP servers, Web platforms such as CMSs, ERPs, Blogs, etc. Also, it has a protocol-independent module to send the desired...
DSL-2750U-Full-chain
firmware-analysis 1. DSL-2750U Bugs : misconfiguration of tftp server CVE-2021-3707 command injection bug CVE-2021-3708...
CVE-2020-25478--ASUS-RT-AC87U-TFTP-is-vulnerable-to-Denial-of-Service-DoS-attack
ASUS-RT-AC87U-TFTP-is-vulnerable-to-Denial-of-Service-DoS-attack CVE-2020-25478 - ASUS RT-AC87U TFTP is vulnerable to Denial of ServiceDoS attack 1. NAME OF AFFECTED PRODUCTS AND VERSIONS ASUS RT-AC87U 3.0.0.4.38251640 2. PROBLEM TYPE Its primarily related to CWE-20, TFTP service running in ASUS...
CentOS Linux 6 [TuxCare] Security Update: curl / libcurl / libcurl-devel (CENTOS6:CLSA-2026:1778223262)
The CentOS Linux 6 host has packages installed that are affected by a vulnerability as referenced in the TuxCare CENTOS6:CLSA-2026:1778223262 advisory. - Heap buffer overflow in the TFTP protocol handler in cURL 7.19.4 to 7.65.3. CVE-2019-5482 Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but ha...
CVE-2026-102721
A TFTP server that answers with a short ERROR packet makes the client read up to 64 bytes past the received datagram. Each receive path checks only that the datagram is at least four bytes long nxdtftpclient.c:1229, 1521, 1984. When the opcode is NXTFTPCODEERROR the message string is copied with ...
CVE-2026-102713
The TFTP server accepts a DATA datagram of any size. The dispatcher rejects datagrams shorter than four bytes nxdtftpserver.c:1037 and nothing anywhere checks an upper bound, in particular not against the protocol maximum of 4 + NXTFTPFILETRANSFERMAX. Two things follow from that one missing check...
CVE-2026-102721
A TFTP server that answers with a short ERROR packet makes the client read up to 64 bytes past the received datagram. Each receive path checks only that the datagram is at least four bytes long nxdtftpclient.c:1229, 1521, 1984. When the opcode is NXTFTPCODEERROR the message string is copied with ...
EUVD-2026-89185
A TFTP server that answers with a short ERROR packet makes the client read up to 64 bytes past the received datagram. Each receive path checks only that the datagram is at least four bytes long nxdtftpclient.c:1229, 1521, 1984. When the opcode is NXTFTPCODEERROR the message string is copied with ...
CVE-2026-102721
A TFTP server that answers with a short ERROR packet makes the client read up to 64 bytes past the received datagram. Each receive path checks only that the datagram is at least four bytes long nxdtftpclient.c:1229, 1521, 1984. When the opcode is NXTFTPCODEERROR the message string is copied with ...
CVE-2026-102721
A TFTP server that answers with a short ERROR packet makes the client read up to 64 bytes past the received datagram. Each receive path checks only that the datagram is at least four bytes long nxdtftpclient.c:1229, 1521, 1984. When the opcode is NXTFTPCODEERROR the message string is copied with ...
CVE-2026-102721
The NetX Duo TFTP client is vulnerable to a heap-buffer-overflow in the nxd_tftp_client.c component. When a remote TFTP server returns an ERROR packet lacking a terminating NUL byte, the client fails to verify the buffer_ptr against the nx_packet_append_ptr during message copying. This causes the...
CVE-2026-102713
The TFTP server accepts a DATA datagram of any size. The dispatcher rejects datagrams shorter than four bytes nxdtftpserver.c:1037 and nothing anywhere checks an upper bound, in particular not against the protocol maximum of 4 + NXTFTPFILETRANSFERMAX. Two things follow from that one missing check...
CVE-2026-102713
The NetX Duo TFTP server is vulnerable to a heap-buffer overflow and a denial-of-service condition due to a missing upper-bound check on incoming DATA datagrams . Because the server fails to validate that nx_packet_length is within the protocol maximum of 4 + NX_TFTP_FILE_TRANSFER_MAX, it allows ...
EUVD-2026-89176
The TFTP server accepts a DATA datagram of any size. The dispatcher rejects datagrams shorter than four bytes nxdtftpserver.c:1037 and nothing anywhere checks an upper bound, in particular not against the protocol maximum of 4 + NXTFTPFILETRANSFERMAX. Two things follow from that one missing check...
CVE-2026-102713
The TFTP server accepts a DATA datagram of any size. The dispatcher rejects datagrams shorter than four bytes nxdtftpserver.c:1037 and nothing anywhere checks an upper bound, in particular not against the protocol maximum of 4 + NXTFTPFILETRANSFERMAX. Two things follow from that one missing check...