Lucene search
+L

8 matches found

RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
•added 2026/01/09 9:37 a.m.•17 views

CVE-2024-34149

In Bitcoin Core through 27.0 and Bitcoin Knots before 25.1.knots20231115, tapscript lacks a policy size limit check, a different issue than CVE-2023-50428. NOTE: some parties oppose this new limit check for example, because they agree with the objective but disagree with the technical mechanism, ...

6.3CVSS6.9AI score0.00773EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
NVD
NVD
•added 2024/04/30 11:15 p.m.•41 views

CVE-2024-34149

In Bitcoin Core through 27.0 and Bitcoin Knots before 25.1.knots20231115, tapscript lacks a policy size limit check, a different issue than CVE-2023-50428. NOTE: some parties oppose this new limit check for example, because they agree with the objective but disagree with the technical mechanism, ...

6.3CVSS5.3AI score0.00384EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
CVE
CVE
•added 2024/04/30 12:00 a.m.•88 views

CVE-2024-34149

Bitcoin Core versions through 27.0 and Bitcoin Knots versions before 25.1.knots20231115 are vulnerable due to a missing policy size limit check in the tapscript implementation. This vulnerability is distinct from CVE-2023-50428. To remediate this issue, users should update to Bitcoin Core version...

6.3CVSS5.3AI score0.00384EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2024/04/30 12:00 a.m.•15 views

PT-2024-25720

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Bitcoin Core versions through 27.0 Bitcoin Knots versions prior to 25.1.knots20231115 Description The tapscript implementation does not include a policy size limit check. This is a separate issue from CVE-2023-50428. Some parties have expresse...

6.3CVSS5.3AI score0.00384EPSS
SaveExploits0References67
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2024/04/30 12:00 a.m.•23 views

CVE-2024-34149

In Bitcoin Core through 27.0 and Bitcoin Knots before 25.1.knots20231115, tapscript lacks a policy size limit check, a different issue than CVE-2023-50428. NOTE: some parties oppose this new limit check for example, because they agree with the objective but disagree with the technical mechanism, ...

6.5AI score0.00384EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2024/04/30 12:00 a.m.•3 views

CVE-2024-34149: Undefined Security Weakness

In Bitcoin Core through 27.0 and Bitcoin Knots before 25.1.knots20231115, tapscript lacks a policy size limit check, a different issue than CVE-2023-50428. NOTE: some parties oppose this new limit check for example, because they agree with the objective but disagree with the technical mechanism, ...

6.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00384EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
OSV
OSV
•added 2024/04/30 12:00 a.m.•12 views

CVE-2024-34149

In Bitcoin Core through 27.0 and Bitcoin Knots before 25.1.knots20231115, tapscript lacks a policy size limit check, a different issue than CVE-2023-50428. NOTE: some parties oppose this new limit check for example, because they agree with the objective but disagree with the technical mechanism, ...

6.3CVSS5.8AI score
SaveExploits0References3
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2024/04/30 12:00 a.m.•48 views

CVE-2024-34149

In Bitcoin Core through 27.0 and Bitcoin Knots before 25.1.knots20231115, tapscript lacks a policy size limit check, a different issue than CVE-2023-50428. NOTE: some parties oppose this new limit check for example, because they agree with the objective but disagree with the technical mechanism, ...

5.6AI score0.00384EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Rows per page
Query Builder