Lucene search
+L

770 matches found

Nuclei
Nuclei
•added 2026/10/05 2:16 a.m.•96 views

SugarCRM 3.5.1 - Cross-Site Scripting

SugarCRM 3.5.1 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting via phprint.php and a parameter name in the query string aka a $key variable. id: CVE-2018-5715 info: name: SugarCRM 3.5.1 - Cross-Site Scripting author: edoardottt severity: medium description: SugarCRM 3.5.1 is vulnerable to cross-site...

6.1CVSS6.2AI score0.06914EPSS
SaveExploits5References5
Nuclei
Nuclei
•added 2026/10/05 2:16 a.m.•45 views

SugarCRM Unauthenticated - Remote Code Execution

In SugarCRM before 12.0. Hotfix 91155, a crafted request can inject custom PHP code through the EmailTemplates because of missing input validation. id: CVE-2023-22952 info: name: SugarCRM Unauthenticated - Remote Code Execution author: iamnoooob,rootxharsh,pdresearch severity: high description: |...

8.8CVSS8.2AI score0.80139EPSS
SaveExploits4References1
Nuclei
Nuclei
•added 2026/10/05 2:16 a.m.•98 views

SugarCRM - Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via PHP Object Injection

A PHP object injection vulnerability exists in SugarCRM versions prior to 6.5.24, 6.7.13, 7.5.2.5, 7.6.2.2, and 7.7.1.0 due to improper validation of PHP serialized input in the SugarRestSerialize.php script. The vulnerable code fails to sanitize the restdata parameter before passing it to the...

9.3CVSS6.3AI score0.04963EPSS
SaveExploits1References5
Nuclei
Nuclei
•added 2026/10/04 2:38 a.m.•47 views

SugarCRM Enterprise 9.0.0 - Cross-Site Scripting

SugarCRM Enterprise 9.0.0 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability via mobile/error-not-supported-platform.html?desktopurl. id: CVE-2019-14974 info: name: SugarCRM Enterprise 9.0.0 - Cross-Site Scripting author: madrobot severity: medium description: SugarCRM Enterprise 9.0.0 contains a...

6.1CVSS6.2AI score0.28433EPSS
SaveExploits3References5
Kitploit
Kitploit
•added 2026/10/01 8:21 a.m.•14 views

CVE-2024-58258

CVE‑2024‑58258 – SugarCRM SSRF 및 로컬 파일 노출 소개 이 저장소는 CVE‑2024‑58258 에 대한 개념 증명을 제공합니다. 이는 사용자 입력이 /css/preview API에서 LESS로 구문 분석되어 인증 없이 SSRF 또는 로컬 파일 접근을 허용하는 SugarCRM13.0.4 / 14.0.1 취약점입니다. 영향받는 버전 13.0.4 이전의 모든 상용 에디션 14.0.1 이전의 모든 상용 에디션 설명 SugarCRM은 /css/preview REST 엔드포인트에서 사용자가 제공한 GET 매개변수...

7.2CVSS6.3AI score0.1853EPSS
SaveExploits3
Patchstack
Patchstack
•added 2025/12/31 12:00 a.m.•18 views

WordPress Web to SugarCRM Lead plugin <= 1.0.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Custom Field Deletion vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery to Custom Field Deletion vulnerability discovered by dayea song - Ahnlab in WordPress Plugin Web to SugarCRM Lead versions = 1.0.0...

4.3CVSS5.9AI score0.00154EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software1
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2025/12/21 6:31 a.m.•12 views

EUVD-2025-204657

The Web to SugarCRM Lead plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the custom field deletion functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete custom fields v...

4.3CVSS4.9AI score0.00154EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
NVD
NVD
•added 2025/12/21 4:16 a.m.•19 views

CVE-2025-13361

The Web to SugarCRM Lead plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the custom field deletion functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete custom fields v...

4.3CVSS0.00154EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
CVE
CVE
•added 2025/12/21 3:20 a.m.•35 views

CVE-2025-13361

CVE-2025-13361 : The Web to SugarCRM Lead plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) up to version 1.0.0 due to missing nonce validation on the custom field deletion function. This enables unauthenticated attackers to delete custom fields by tricking a site administra...

4.3CVSS5.6AI score0.00154EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2025/12/21 3:20 a.m.•42 views

CVE-2025-13361 Web to SugarCRM Lead <= 1.0.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Custom Field Deletion

The Web to SugarCRM Lead plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the custom field deletion functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete custom fields v...

4.3CVSS0.00154EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2025/12/21 3:20 a.m.•10 views

CVE-2025-13361 Web to SugarCRM Lead <= 1.0.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Custom Field Deletion

The Web to SugarCRM Lead plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the custom field deletion functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete custom fields v...

4.3CVSS5.6AI score0.00154EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2025/12/21 12:00 a.m.•23 views

PT-2025-52581

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Web to SugarCRM Lead plugin for WordPress versions up to and including 1.0.0 Description The Web to SugarCRM Lead plugin for WordPress is susceptible to Cross-Site Request Forgery CSRF. This is caused by a lack of nonce validation when deletin...

4.3CVSS6.1AI score0.00154EPSS
SaveExploits0References9
CNNVD
CNNVD
•added 2025/12/21 12:00 a.m.•13 views

WordPress plugin Web to SugarCRM Lead 跨站请求伪造漏洞

WordPress and WordPress plugin are both products of the WordPress Foundation.WordPress is a blogging platform developed using the PHP language. The platform has the ability to host personal blog sites on PHP and MySQL based servers.WordPress plugin is an application plugin. A cross-site request...

4.3CVSS6.5AI score0.00154EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2025/12/21 12:00 a.m.•3 views

CVE-2025-13361: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The Web to SugarCRM Lead plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the custom field deletion functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete custom fields v...

4.3CVSS5.5AI score0.00154EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
GithubExploit
GithubExploit
•added 2025/11/21 12:54 p.m.•190 views

Exploit for CVE-2024-58258

CVE‑2024‑58258 – SugarCRM SSRF & Local File Disclosure Abo...

7.2CVSS7AI score0.1853EPSS
SaveExploits3
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2025/10/07 12:30 a.m.•15 views

EUVD-2019-7729

Malware in sbrugna...

8.8CVSS8.6AI score0.01488EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2025/10/07 12:30 a.m.•12 views

EUVD-2004-1223

Malware in sbrugna...

5CVSS6.4AI score0.01212EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2025/10/07 12:30 a.m.•24 views

EUVD-2019-7720

Malware in sbrugna...

7.2CVSS7.2AI score0.01353EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2025/10/07 12:30 a.m.•17 views

EUVD-2019-7719

Malware in sbrugna...

7.2CVSS7.2AI score0.01353EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2025/10/07 12:30 a.m.•16 views

EUVD-2019-7705

Malware in sbrugna...

7.2CVSS7.2AI score0.01123EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Rows per page
Query Builder