_safeJoeTransfer doesn't refund users JOE incase of rounding error

Handle jayjonah8 Vulnerability details Impact In WJLP.sol a user can call the claimReward function to claim the JOE rewards they are owed. This eventually calls the safeJoeTransfer function which will check if the amount to send is greater than the joeBal of the contract. If the amount is greater...

Constructor does not ensure that addresses are not the same

Handle jayjonah8 Vulnerability details Impact In WJLP.sol, 3 addresses are passed in setting the MasterChefJoe, JLP, and JOE addresses in storage. There are no checks ensuring that these addresses are different from one another. This means that during deployment, a mistake can easily be made of...

Failed transfer with low level call could be overlooked

Handle harleythedog Vulnerability details Impact There are several places where low level call is used within the contract. In particular, in SavingsAccount.sol, the external withdraw function has the to argument, which is eventually used in this code in transfer: bool success, = to.callvalue:...

DoS when depositing collateral

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The Pool.depositCollateral and Pool.addCollateralInMarginCall functions require the caller to have a pool token balance of zero. function depositCollateraluint256 amount, bool transferFromSavingsAccount external payable override requireamount != 0, 'DC1'; //...

Collateral can be deposited in a finished pool

Handle pedroais Vulnerability details Proof of Concept The depositCollateral function doesn't check the status of the pool so collateral can be deposited in a finished loan. This can happen by mistake and all funds will be lost. Recommended Mitigation Steps Require loan status to be collection or...

Yearn token <> shares conversion decimal issue

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The yearn strategy YearnYield converts shares to tokens by doing pricePerFullShare shares / 1e18: function getTokensForSharesuint256 shares, address asset public view override returns uint256 amount if shares == 0 return 0; // @audit should divided by...

No slippage tolerance checks during swap functions opens up flashloan attacks and price manipulation

Handle jayjonah8 Vulnerability details Impact With functions like joinTokenSingle in SingleTokenJoin.sol that handle swapping with uniswapV2 like exchanges there are no slippage tolerance checks in place to prevent flashloan attacks and price manipulation. Proof of Concept Tools Used Manual code...

SavingsAccount withdrawAll and switchStrategy can freeze user funds by ignoring possible strategy liquidity issues

Handle hyh Vulnerability details Impact Full withdrawal and moving funds between strategies can lead to wrong accounting if the corresponding market has tight liquidity, which can be the case at least for AaveYield. That is, as the whole amount is required to be moved at once from Aave, both...

SHOULD CHECK RETURN DATA FROM CHAINLINK AGGREGATORS

Handle defsec Vulnerability details Impact The sync function in the contract ChainlinkOracle.sol fetches the asset price from a Chainlink aggregator using the latestRoundData function. However, there are no checks on roundID, resulting in stale prices. The oracle wrapper calls out to a chainlink...

JoinTokenSingle() function does not validate against evil struct inputs

Handle jayjonah8 Vulnerability details Impact In SingleTokenJoin.sol, the joinTokenSingle function allows a user to add any token address as an inputToken and any address as the outputBasket address without validating the struct data to guard against malicious input Proof of Concept An attacker...

Reward stuck if promotion cancel before all past reward claimed

Handle gzeon Vulnerability details Impact When owner call cancelPromotion, the contract 1. Delete the promotion struct L132 2. Return all token reserved for future epochs L133 If there are token left for previous epochs, they will be stuck in the contract as the promotion struct is gone. Proof of...

Allowing more than 256 epochs leads to loss of funds

Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The TwabRewards contract has an implicit restriction of 256 epochs per promotion as it uses a bitmask in a uint256 to mark claimed epochs 0-255, see isClaimedEpoch. "/// @dev We pack epochs claimed by a user into a uint256. So we can't store more than 255...

Can drain any promotion rewards

Handle gzeon Vulnerability details Impact There are no checks to make sure epochId const promotionId = 1; const wallet2Amount = toWei'750'; const wallet3Amount = toWei'250'; await ticket.mintwallet2.address, wallet2Amount; await ticket.connectwallet2.delegatewallet2.address; await...

Support of deflationary / rebasing tokens

Handle pauliax Vulnerability details Impact Deflationary fee on transfer / rebasing tokens are not supported. Because anyone can createPromotion with an arbitrary token, such tokens may be lost forever. Recommended Mitigation Steps Consider checking the actual amounts transferred balance...

If a promoter cancels a promotion, unclaimed rewards of ticket holders are lost

Handle hubble Vulnerability details Impact Loss of rewards for the ticket holders who have not yet claimed the rewards accrued until the previous epocs, if the promoter cancels the promotion after any epoch. Proof of Concept contract : TwabRewards function : cancelPromotion line 132 delete...

U.S. Dept Of Defense: ██████████ running a vulnerable log4j

Description: https://vulners.com/cve/CVE-2021-44228 Impact Probably arbitrary code execution System Hosts ████████ Affected Products and Versions CVE Numbers CVE-2021-44228 Steps to Reproduce 1. Browse to https://████████/███████https%3A%2F%2F█████████%2F 2. Enter a...

StartTimestamp is not checked

Handle defsec Vulnerability details Impact When the promotion is created, the promotion.startTimestamp variable can be so old date. That will cause to affect to epoch calculation. Proof of Concept 1. Navigate to the following contract code. promotionsnextPromotionId = Promotion msg.sender, ticket...

Exploit for Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in Siemens 6Bk1602-0Aa12-0Tp0_Firmware

Log4Shell sample vulnerable application CVE-2021-44228 This...

Remote Code Execution (RCE)

Overview log4j-jars is a ruby bundled Log4j jars. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution RCE. Apache Log4j2 JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An...

Basket:handleFees(): fees are overcharged

Handle GiveMeTestEther Vulnerability details Impact The fee calculation is based on the totalSupply of the basket token. But some amount of the totalSupply represents the fees paid to the publisher/ protocol owner. Therefore the fees are "overcharged": because the fee amount is calculated on a pa...