Lucene search
+L

3 matches found

Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/09/27 12:0 a.m.17 views

M-05 MitigationConfirmed

Lines of code Vulnerability details In the previous implementation when stakingContract.totalAllocPoint = 0 stakingContract.withdraw and stakingContract.deposit will div 0 , revert This results in StargateRewardableWrapper no longer being able to execute StargateRewardableWrapper.withdraw The...

7.2AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/08/04 12:0 a.m.20 views

StargateRewardableWrapper._claimAssetRewards should use stakingContract.withdraw(poolId, 0)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact StargateRewardableWrapper.claimAssetRewards leverage stakingContract.depositpoolId, 0; to claim rewards from Stargate. But it could fail to claim the reward in the edge case. Proof of Concept StargateRewardableWrapper.claimAssetRewards calls...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/03/15 12:0 a.m.19 views

An malicious user can mint a huge amount of BYTES 2.0 tokens for himself

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker can mint a huge amount of BYTES 2.0 tokens for himself. Additionally, the rewards system can be permanently damaged by making the pool.totalPoints a huge number, not reflecting the actual state of the system. Proof of Concept There are two co...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder