Code injection

The sellTokenForLRC function in the vault protocol in the smart contract implementation for Loopring LRC, an Ethereum token, lacks access control for fee swapping and thus allows price manipulation...

CVE-2020-35962

The sellTokenForLRC function in the vault protocol in the smart contract implementation for Loopring LRC, an Ethereum token, lacks access control for fee swapping and thus allows price manipulation...

CVE-2020-35962

The CVE-2020-35962 issue affects Loopring (LRC) by the vault protocol’s sellTokenForLRC function in its smart contract, which lacks access control for fee swapping. This vulnerability enables price manipulation within the on-chain logic. The documented impact is a HIGH severity in CVSS 3.1 (I:H) ...

CVE-2021-3006

The breed function in the smart contract implementation for Farm in Seal Finance Seal, an Ethereum token, lacks access control and thus allows price manipulation, as exploited in the wild in December 2020 and January 2021...

Design/Logic Flaw

The breed function in the smart contract implementation for Farm in Seal Finance Seal, an Ethereum token, lacks access control and thus allows price manipulation, as exploited in the wild in December 2020 and January 2021...

CVE-2021-3006

The breed function in the smart contract implementation for Farm in Seal Finance Seal, an Ethereum token, lacks access control and thus allows price manipulation, as exploited in the wild in December 2020 and January 2021...

CVE-2021-3006

The CVE-2021-3006 entry concerns the Seal Finance (Seal) Ethereum token. The breed function in its smart contract lacks access control, enabling price manipulation. Exploitation occurred in the wild during December 2020 and January 2021. The available documents confirm the root cause (unauthorize...

CVE-2021-3006

The breed function in the smart contract implementation for Farm in Seal Finance Seal, an Ethereum token, lacks access control and thus allows price manipulation, as exploited in the wild in December 2020 and January 2021...

CVE-2021-3004

The deposit function in the smart contract implementation for Stable Yield Credit yCREDIT, an Ethereum token, has certain incorrect calculations. An attacker can obtain more yCREDIT tokens than they should...

CVE-2021-3004

Technical details about CVE-2021-3004 are not present in the connected documents. The description notes incorrect calculations in the yCREDIT deposit function, but no vendor/version/exploit specifics are supplied here; monitor for updates.

HaXmas Hardware Hacking

Usually, when you read an IoT hacking report or blog post, it ends with something along the lines of, "and that's how I got root," or "and there was a secret backdoor credential," or "and every device in the field uses the same S3 bucket with no authentication." You know, something bad, and the...

FBI Warn Hackers are Using Hijacked Home Security Devices for 'Swatting'

Stolen email passwords are being used to hijack smart home security systems to “swat” unsuspecting users, the Federal Bureau of Investigation warned this week. The announcement comes after concerned device manufacturers alerted law enforcement about the issue. Swatting is a dangerous prank where...

CVE-2019-15080

An issue was discovered in a smart contract implementation for MORPH Token through 2019-06-05, an Ethereum token. A typo in the constructor of the Owned contract which is inherited by MORPH Token allows attackers to acquire contract ownership. A new owner can subsequently obtain MORPH Tokens for...

CVE-2019-15080

An issue was discovered in a smart contract implementation for MORPH Token through 2019-06-05, an Ethereum token. A typo in the constructor of the Owned contract which is inherited by MORPH Token allows attackers to acquire contract ownership. A new owner can subsequently obtain MORPH Tokens for...

CVE-2019-15078

An issue was discovered in a smart contract implementation for AIRDROPX BORN through 2019-05-29, an Ethereum token. The name of the constructor has a typo wrong case: XBornID versus XBORNID that allows an attacker to change the owner of the contract and obtain cryptocurrency for free...

CVE-2019-15079

A typo exists in the constructor of a smart contract implementation for EAI through 2019-06-05, an Ethereum token. This vulnerability could be used by an attacker to acquire EAI tokens for free...

Double free

A typo exists in the constructor of a smart contract implementation for EAI through 2019-06-05, an Ethereum token. This vulnerability could be used by an attacker to acquire EAI tokens for free...

Code injection

An issue was discovered in a smart contract implementation for MORPH Token through 2019-06-05, an Ethereum token. A typo in the constructor of the Owned contract which is inherited by MORPH Token allows attackers to acquire contract ownership. A new owner can subsequently obtain MORPH Tokens for...

Design/Logic Flaw

An issue was discovered in a smart contract implementation for AIRDROPX BORN through 2019-05-29, an Ethereum token. The name of the constructor has a typo wrong case: XBornID versus XBORNID that allows an attacker to change the owner of the contract and obtain cryptocurrency for free...

CVE-2019-15080

An issue was discovered in a smart contract implementation for MORPH Token through 2019-06-05, an Ethereum token. A typo in the constructor of the Owned contract which is inherited by MORPH Token allows attackers to acquire contract ownership. A new owner can subsequently obtain MORPH Tokens for...