2495 matches found
EUVD-2024-21254
Malicious code in bioql PyPI...
EUVD-2025-23624
Malicious code in bioql PyPI...
EUVD-2024-21256
Malicious code in bioql PyPI...
EUVD-2023-28967
Malicious code in bioql PyPI...
EUVD-2023-41278
Malicious code in bioql PyPI...
EUVD-2024-38959
Malicious code in bioql PyPI...
EUVD-2024-21250
Malicious code in bioql PyPI...
EUVD-2023-41167
Malicious code in bioql PyPI...
EUVD-2024-41728
Malicious code in bioql PyPI...
EUVD-2023-48445
Malicious code in bioql PyPI...
EUVD-2023-28974
Malicious code in bioql PyPI...
EUVD-2023-42469
Malicious code in bioql PyPI...
EUVD-2025-7666
Malicious code in bioql PyPI...
LegalSim: Multi-Agent Simulation of Legal Systems for Discovering Procedural Exploits
We present LegalSim, a modular multi-agent simulation of adversarial legal proceedings that explores how AI systems can exploit procedural weaknesses in codified rules. Plaintiff and defendant agents choose from a constrained action space for example, discovery requests, motions, meet-and-confer,...
The vulnerability of software for discrete event simulation and automation in Rockwell Automation Arena lies in the use of memory after it is freed, allowing a hacker to execute arbitrary code.
The vulnerability of software for discrete event simulation and automation in Rockwell Automation Arena relates to the use of memory after it is freed. Exploiting this vulnerability can allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code...
The vulnerability of software for discrete event simulation and automation in Rockwell Automation Arena lies in insufficient validation of input data, allowing a perpetrator to execute arbitrary code.
The vulnerability of software for discrete event simulation and automation in Rockwell Automation Arena is related to insufficient verification of input data. Exploiting this vulnerability can allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code...
Pentesting-Assistant
Pentesting-Assistant AI-powered penetration testing assist...
Crash Tests for Security: Why BAS Is Proof of Defense, Not Assumptions
Car makers don't trust blueprints. They smash prototypes into walls. Again and again. In controlled conditions. Because design specs don't prove survival. Crash tests do. They separate theory from reality. Cybersecurity is no different. Dashboards overflow with "critical" exposure alerts...
Crash Tests for Security: Why BAS Is Proof of Defense, Not Assumptions
Car makers don’t trust blueprints. They smash prototypes into walls. Again and again. In controlled conditions. Because design specs don’t prove survival. Crash tests do. They separate theory from reality. Cybersecurity is no different. Dashboards overflow with “critical” exposure alerts...
