29 matches found
EUVD-2026-54961
A Server-Side Request Forgery SSRF vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The nltk.pathsec.validatenetworkurl function, intended to prevent SSRF by rejecting internal network addresses, fails to reject IPs in the RFC 6598 shared address space 100.64.0.0/1...
Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2026-12372
The Linux/Unix host has one or more packages installed that are impacted by a vulnerability without a vendor supplied patch available. - A Server-Side Request Forgery SSRF vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The nltk.pathsec.validatenetworkurl function...
CVE-2026-12372
A flaw was found in NLTK. A Server-Side Request Forgery SSRF vulnerability allows an attacker to influence a URL passed to NLTK's network-loading helpers. This occurs because the nltk.pathsec.validatenetworkurl function fails to properly identify and reject IP addresses within the RFC 6598 shared...
CVE-2026-12372
A Server-Side Request Forgery SSRF vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The nltk.pathsec.validatenetworkurl function, intended to prevent SSRF by rejecting internal network addresses, fails to reject IPs in the RFC 6598 shared address space 100.64.0.0/1...
CVE-2026-12372
A Server-Side Request Forgery SSRF vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The nltk.pathsec.validatenetworkurl function, intended to prevent SSRF by rejecting internal network addresses, fails to reject IPs in the RFC 6598 shared address space 100.64.0.0/1...
CVE-2026-12372
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The function nltk.pathsec.validate_network_url() fails to reject IPs in RFC 6598 shared address space (100.64.0.0/10) because Python’s ipaddress classification does not mark such addresses as i...
@novu/application-generic: `validateUrlSsrf` permits CGNAT (100.64.0.0/10) destinations — affects Workflow HTTP request step + Webhook filter condition
Hi Novu team, Reporting an SSRF blocklist gap in the shared validateUrlSsrf guard. A complete self-contained reproduction is inlined below — copy the four files into a directory and run docker compose up, plus a single-file probe that runs against Node directly. Locally validated against HEAD...
PYSEC-2026-3050 requests-hardened is Vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery
The SSRF protection in requests-hardened prior to version 1.2.1 fails to block IP addresses within the RFC 6598 Shared Address Space 100.64.0.0/10. An attacker who can supply arbitrary URLs to requests-hardened could exploit this gap to access internal services hosted within 100.64.0.0/10. This i...
CVE-2026-42175
requests-hardened is a library that overrides the default behaviors of the requests library, and adds new security features. Prior to , the SSRF protection in requests-hardened fails to block IP addresses within the RFC 6598 Shared Address Space 100.64.0.0/10. An attacker who can supply arbitrary...
CVE-2026-42175
requests-hardened is a library that overrides the default behaviors of the requests library, and adds new security features. Prior to , the SSRF protection in requests-hardened fails to block IP addresses within the RFC 6598 Shared Address Space 100.64.0.0/10. An attacker who can supply arbitrary...
CVE-2026-42175 requests-hardened: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in requests-hardened RFC 6598
requests-hardened is a library that overrides the default behaviors of the requests library, and adds new security features. Prior to , the SSRF protection in requests-hardened fails to block IP addresses within the RFC 6598 Shared Address Space 100.64.0.0/10. An attacker who can supply arbitrary...
CVE-2026-42175 requests-hardened: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in requests-hardened RFC 6598
requests-hardened is a library that overrides the default behaviors of the requests library, and adds new security features. Prior to , the SSRF protection in requests-hardened fails to block IP addresses within the RFC 6598 Shared Address Space 100.64.0.0/10. An attacker who can supply arbitrary...
CVE-2026-42175
The CVE-2026-42175 entry concerns the requests-hardened library, whose SSRF protection failed to block addresses in RFC 6598 (100.64.0.0/10). Affected behavior: an attacker able to supply arbitrary URLs could reach internal services within 100.64.0.0/10 in environments using that CIDR (e.g., AWS ...
CVE-2026-42175 requests-hardened: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in requests-hardened RFC 6598
requests-hardened is a library that overrides the default behaviors of the requests library, and adds new security features. Prior to , the SSRF protection in requests-hardened fails to block IP addresses within the RFC 6598 Shared Address Space 100.64.0.0/10. An attacker who can supply arbitrary...
GHSA-VH75-FWV3-PQRH requests-hardened is Vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery
The SSRF protection in requests-hardened prior to version 1.2.1 fails to block IP addresses within the RFC 6598 Shared Address Space 100.64.0.0/10. An attacker who can supply arbitrary URLs to requests-hardened could exploit this gap to access internal services hosted within 100.64.0.0/10. This i...
requests-hardened is Vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery
The SSRF protection in requests-hardened prior to version 1.2.1 fails to block IP addresses within the RFC 6598 Shared Address Space 100.64.0.0/10. An attacker who can supply arbitrary URLs to requests-hardened could exploit this gap to access internal services hosted within 100.64.0.0/10. This i...
PT-2026-37250
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions requests-hardened versions prior to 1.2.1 Description The Server-Side Request Forgery SSRF protection fails to block IP addresses within the RFC 6598 Shared Address Space 100.64.0.0/10. An attacker capable of supplying arbitrary URLs can explo...
CVE-2022-0249
A vulnerability was discovered in GitLab starting with version 12. GitLab was vulnerable to a blind SSRF attack since requests to shared address space were not blocked...