1542 matches found
CVE-2024-33258
Jerryscript commit ff9ff8f was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via the component vmloop at jerry-core/vm/vm.c...
CVE-2024-33260
CVE-2024-33260 concerns Jerryscript: a segmentation fault in the JS parser component, specifically in parser_parse_class within jerry-core/parser/js/js-parser-expr.c, tied to commit cefd391. The entry names a vulnerability in that commit; exploitation details are not provided in the documents. Mu...
CVE-2024-33258
Removed by vendor...
CVE-2024-31755
cJSON v1.7.17 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation, which can trigger through the second parameter of function cJSONSetValuestring at cJSON.c...
CVE-2024-33259
Removed by vendor...
CVE-2024-33258
Jerryscript commit ff9ff8f was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via the component vmloop at jerry-core/vm/vm.c...
CVE-2024-33260
Jerryscript commit cefd391 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via the component parserparseclass at jerry-core/parser/js/js-parser-expr.c...
CVE-2024-33260
Jerryscript commit cefd391 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via the component parserparseclass at jerry-core/parser/js/js-parser-expr.c...
CVE-2024-31755
cJSON v1.7.17 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation, which can trigger through the second parameter of function cJSONSetValuestring at cJSON.c...
CVE-2024-33260
Jerryscript commit cefd391 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via the component parserparseclass at jerry-core/parser/js/js-parser-expr.c...
CVE-2024-33259
Jerryscript commit cefd391 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via the component scannerseek at jerry-core/parser/js/js-scanner-util.c...
PT-2024-25173 · Unknown · Jerryscript
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Jerryscript version cefd391 Description: A segmentation violation was discovered in Jerryscript via the component scanner seek at jerry-core/parser/js/js-scanner-util.c. Recommendations: For Jerryscript version cefd391, consider avoiding the...
Segmentation Violation
XPDF is vulnerable to a segmentation violation. The vulnerability is due to an issue in the component /xpdf/AcroForm.cc at line 538...
CVE-2023-45924
libglxproto.c in OpenGL libglvnd bb06db5a was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via the function glXGetDrawableScreen. NOTE: this is disputed because there are no common situations in which users require uninterrupted operation with an attacker-controller server...
CVE-2023-45922
glxpbuffer.c in Mesa 23.0.4 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation when calling glXGetDrawableAttribute. NOTE: this is disputed because there are no common situations in which users require uninterrupted operation with an attacker-controller server...
CVE-2023-45924
libglxproto.c in OpenGL libglvnd bb06db5a was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via the function glXGetDrawableScreen. NOTE: this is disputed because there are no common situations in which users require uninterrupted operation with an attacker-controller server...
CVE-2023-45922
glxpbuffer.c in Mesa 23.0.4 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation when calling glXGetDrawableAttribute. NOTE: this is disputed because there are no common situations in which users require uninterrupted operation with an attacker-controller server...
CVE-2023-45922
glxpbuffer.c in Mesa 23.0.4 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation when calling glXGetDrawableAttribute. NOTE: this is disputed because there are no common situations in which users require uninterrupted operation with an attacker-controller server...
CVE-2023-45924
CVE-2023-45924 involves a segmentation violation in libglvnd’s GLX path: libglxproto.c in OpenGL libglvnd, specifically the function glXGetDrawableScreen(). The issue is disputed: there are few common scenarios requiring uninterrupted operation with an attacker‑controller server. Multiple connect...
CVE-2023-45922
glxpbuffer.c in Mesa 23.0.4 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation when calling glXGetDrawableAttribute. NOTE: this is disputed because there are no common situations in which users require uninterrupted operation with an attacker-controller server...