Design/Logic Flaw

An issue was discovered on ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 3.01.01 devices. Due to an insufficient implementation of jamming detection, an attacker is able to suppress correctly received RF messages sent between wireless peripheral components, e.g., wireless detectors or remote controls, and the ABUS...

CVE-2019-9861

Due to the use of an insecure RFID technology MIFARE Classic, ABUS proximity chip keys RFID tokens of the ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 wireless alarm system can easily be cloned and used to deactivate the alarm system in an unauthorized way...

CVE-2019-9861

Due to the use of an insecure RFID technology MIFARE Classic, ABUS proximity chip keys RFID tokens of the ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 wireless alarm system can easily be cloned and used to deactivate the alarm system in an unauthorized way...

Design/Logic Flaw

Due to the use of an insecure RFID technology MIFARE Classic, ABUS proximity chip keys RFID tokens of the ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 wireless alarm system can easily be cloned and used to deactivate the alarm system in an unauthorized way...

CVE-2019-9861

The CVE-2019-9861 entry concerns ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 wireless alarm system: an insecure RFID technology (MIFARE Classic) allows cloning of proximity chip keys (RFID tokens) and unauthorized deactivation of the alarm. Affected component is the RFID-based access mechanism used by ABUS proximity ...