Lucene search
+L

195 matches found

Atlassian
Atlassian
•added 2008/01/10 3:35 a.m.•31 views

Moving a subtask Issue Type will sometimes ask the user for a Security Level even though this value is inherited from the Parent Issue.

When you move a subtask from an Issue Type where Security Level is a hidden field, to one where Security Level is no longer hidden, the system can mistakenly ask the User for a new Security Level. This is only a minor issue, as then the subtask will not actually take on the chosen value - it will...

0.4AI score
SaveExploits0Affected Software1
Atlassian
Atlassian
•added 2008/01/10 3:35 a.m.•30 views

Moving a subtask Issue Type will sometimes ask the user for a Security Level even though this value is inherited from the Parent Issue.

When you move a subtask from an Issue Type where Security Level is a hidden field, to one where Security Level is no longer hidden, the system can mistakenly ask the User for a new Security Level. This is only a minor issue, as then the subtask will not actually take on the chosen value - it will...

0.4AI score
SaveExploits0
Atlassian
Atlassian
•added 2007/11/12 3:22 a.m.•34 views

Bulk Move does not update the Security Level of subtasks

When doing a bulk move, Parent issues moved to a new project must take any subtasks with them. If the new project has a different Issue Security scheme, then issues should get the default issue security in the new project. Currently a bulk move will change the security setting of parent issues, b...

1.2AI score
SaveExploits0Affected Software1
Atlassian
Atlassian
•added 2007/11/12 3:22 a.m.•36 views

Bulk Move does not update the Security Level of subtasks

When doing a bulk move, Parent issues moved to a new project must take any subtasks with them. If the new project has a different Issue Security scheme, then issues should get the default issue security in the new project. Currently a bulk move will change the security setting of parent issues, b...

1.2AI score
SaveExploits0
Atlassian
Atlassian
•added 2007/10/24 6:04 a.m.•33 views

Issues not shown in issue navigator that a user has permission for according to the issue security level

Users may not be able to see certain issues in the IssueNavigator, if they create an issue level security, where the permission depends on a user custom field where the customfield does not have a searcher set. Browsing the issue directly, works fine, however when running a search the issue wont ...

0.8AI score
SaveExploits0Affected Software1
Atlassian
Atlassian
•added 2007/10/24 6:04 a.m.•40 views

Issues not shown in issue navigator that a user has permission for according to the issue security level

Users may not be able to see certain issues in the IssueNavigator, if they create an issue level security, where the permission depends on a user custom field where the customfield does not have a searcher set. Browsing the issue directly, works fine, however when running a search the issue wont ...

0.8AI score
SaveExploits0Affected Software1
Atlassian
Atlassian
•added 2007/10/24 6:04 a.m.•33 views

Issues not shown in issue navigator that a user has permission for according to the issue security level

Users may not be able to see certain issues in the IssueNavigator, if they create an issue level security, where the permission depends on a user custom field where the customfield does not have a searcher set. Browsing the issue directly, works fine, however when running a search the issue wont ...

0.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Atlassian
Atlassian
•added 2007/10/15 12:17 a.m.•80 views

IssueLevelSecurity permission check does not work with a DocumentIssueImpl if no security level has been set.

We need to be able to handle per issue permission checks, if no issue security level has been set. The problem is that if no issue level security is set, -1 gets indexed. The permissions code however expects a null value...

1.6AI score
SaveExploits0Affected Software1
Atlassian
Atlassian
•added 2007/10/15 12:17 a.m.•123 views

IssueLevelSecurity permission check does not work with a DocumentIssueImpl if no security level has been set.

We need to be able to handle per issue permission checks, if no issue security level has been set. The problem is that if no issue level security is set, -1 gets indexed. The permissions code however expects a null value...

1.6AI score
SaveExploits0Affected Software1
Atlassian
Atlassian
•added 2007/10/15 12:17 a.m.•35 views

IssueLevelSecurity permission check does not work with a DocumentIssueImpl if no security level has been set.

We need to be able to handle per issue permission checks, if no issue security level has been set. The problem is that if no issue level security is set, -1 gets indexed. The permissions code however expects a null value...

1.6AI score
SaveExploits0
Atlassian
Atlassian
•added 2007/08/16 7:19 p.m.•27 views

Security level for attachments and screenshots

Discussing inside the team issues reported to JIRA by customers, we can hide from them our in-team comments, but cannot do it to attachments and screen-shots...

1.7AI score
SaveExploits0Affected Software1
Atlassian
Atlassian
•added 2007/06/14 8:55 a.m.•33 views

CommentService validation methods do not check user's security level

The validateCommentUpdate, hasPermissionToUpdate and hasPermissionToDelete methods on DefaultCommentService check the user's comment-related permissions but neglect to check whether they have a role/group security level viewable by the user attempting to delete a comment...

2.9AI score
SaveExploits0Affected Software1
Atlassian
Atlassian
•added 2007/06/14 8:55 a.m.•27 views

CommentService validation methods do not check user's security level

The validateCommentUpdate, hasPermissionToUpdate and hasPermissionToDelete methods on DefaultCommentService check the user's comment-related permissions but neglect to check whether they have a role/group security level viewable by the user attempting to delete a comment...

2.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Atlassian
Atlassian
•added 2007/03/07 9:02 p.m.•28 views

Project Role Modifications not reflected in Issue Security Scheme

If you modify users/groups in a project's project role and this project uses an issue security scheme, you must remove the role and re-add it to the issue security scheme for the role changes to take effect. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Need to be the admin of a project whose issue creation screen has...

0.8AI score
SaveExploits0Affected Software1
Atlassian
Atlassian
•added 2007/03/07 9:02 p.m.•34 views

Project Role Modifications not reflected in Issue Security Scheme

If you modify users/groups in a project's project role and this project uses an issue security scheme, you must remove the role and re-add it to the issue security scheme for the role changes to take effect. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Need to be the admin of a project whose issue creation screen has...

0.8AI score
SaveExploits0Affected Software1
Atlassian
Atlassian
•added 2007/03/07 9:02 p.m.•32 views

Project Role Modifications not reflected in Issue Security Scheme

If you modify users/groups in a project's project role and this project uses an issue security scheme, you must remove the role and re-add it to the issue security scheme for the role changes to take effect. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Need to be the admin of a project whose issue creation screen has...

0.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Check Point Advisories
Check Point Advisories
•added 2006/10/26 12:00 a.m.•16 views

Microsoft Windows Server Service SMB Rename Code Execution (MS06-063; CVE-2006-4696)

SMB Server Message Block is a file, print, and other network services suite used by Windows operating systems. By sending a specially crafted SMB Rename request, an attacker may cause a remote Windows server to reboot or halt. In combination with successful code injection, this could also lead to...

9CVSS7.2AI score0.43309EPSS
SaveExploits0
Exploit DB
Exploit DB
•added 2006/08/18 12:00 a.m.•38 views

Joomla! Component Kochsuite 0.9.4 - Remote File Inclusion

.: insecurity research team :. ....:...:. . .:. | |/ :/ // :/ .:. : | | | \\ /\ / :. . ..: ||| / \ \ .: .:.. .. ./ .:/:. ./. .:/: . ...:. .advisory. .:... :..................: 18.o8.2oo6 .. Affected Application: Kochsuite v0.9.4 Mambo/Joomla CMS Component . . : contact :...

7.5CVSS5.8AI score0.0323EPSS
SaveExploits2
Packet Storm
Packet Storm
•added 2006/01/10 12:00 a.m.•75 views

rt-sa-2005-15.txt

Advisory: BSD Securelevels: Circumventing protection of files flagged immutable By mounting an arbitrary filesystem, it is possible to mask files flagged immutable with any user-defined files. Details ======= Product: FreeBSD up to 6.0-STABLE and 7.0-CURRENT OpenBSD up to 3.8 DragonFly up to 1.2...

4.3CVSS6.7AI score0.00426EPSS
SaveExploits2
securityvulns
securityvulns
•added 2006/01/09 12:00 a.m.•62 views

[Full-disclosure] BSD Securelevels: Circumventing protection of files flagged immutable

Advisory: BSD Securelevels: Circumventing protection of files flagged immutable By mounting an arbitrary filesystem, it is possible to mask files flagged immutable with any user-defined files. Details ======= Product: FreeBSD up to 6.0-STABLE and 7.0-CURRENT OpenBSD up to 3.8 DragonFly up to 1.2...

4.3CVSS6.4AI score0.00426EPSS
SaveExploits2
Rows per page
Query Builder