EUVD-2025-210627

When secondary user stores are configured, the implicit-association resolver incorrectly initializes from a secondary user store and bypasses the primary user store during search and uniqueness checks. This allows a subject to be associated with an unintended local account if the same lookup clai...

CVE-2025-11850

When secondary user stores are configured, the implicit-association resolver incorrectly initializes from a secondary user store and bypasses the primary user store during search and uniqueness checks. This allows a subject to be associated with an unintended local account if the same lookup clai...

CVE-2025-11850 Improper Implicit Association via User Store Initialization in WSO2 Identity Server [Identity Confusion / External IDP Use]

When secondary user stores are configured, the implicit-association resolver incorrectly initializes from a secondary user store and bypasses the primary user store during search and uniqueness checks. This allows a subject to be associated with an unintended local account if the same lookup clai...

CVE-2024-6832

CVE-2024-6832 describes an account locking failure in multiple WSO2 products where the lockout is not triggered if secondary user stores are inaccessible. The root cause is that the system does not maintain a consistent lockout state across all configured stores, enabling an attacker to perform r...

CVE-2024-6832 Account Lockout Failure via Secondary User Store Inaccessibility in Multiple WSO2 Products Allows Brute Force Attacks

The account locking mechanism fails to trigger when secondary user stores are inaccessible. The software does not maintain a consistent state for account locking if it cannot reach all configured user stores, allowing an attacker to repeatedly attempt authentication with invalid credentials witho...

EUVD-2025-27039

Malicious code in bioql PyPI...

EUVD-2025-26586

Malicious code in bioql PyPI...

EUVD-2025-26832

Malicious code in bioql PyPI...

CVE-2025-32345

In updateState of ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java, there is a possible way for a secondary user to disable the primary user's deceptive app scanning setting due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges...

CVE-2025-26435

In updateState of ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java, there is a possible way for a secondary user to disable the primary user's deceptive app scanning setting due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges...

CVE-2025-22428

In hasInteractAcrossUsersFullPermission of AppInfoBase.java, there is a possible way to grant permissions to an app on the secondary user from the primary user due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User...

CVE-2025-32345

In updateState of ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java, there is a possible way for a secondary user to disable the primary user's deceptive app scanning setting due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges...

CVE-2025-32345

In updateState of ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java, there is a possible way for a secondary user to disable the primary user's deceptive app scanning setting due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges...

CVE-2025-32345

The CVE-2025-32345 issue affects Android’s ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java (updateState), where a logic error allows a secondary user to disable the primary user’s deceptive app scanning setting. This enables local privilege escalation with no additional privileges or user intera...

CVE-2025-32345

In updateState of ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java, there is a possible way for a secondary user to disable the primary user's deceptive app scanning setting due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges...

CVE-2025-32345

In updateState of ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java, there is a possible way for a secondary user to disable the primary user's deceptive app scanning setting due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges...

CVE-2025-26435

In updateState of ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java, there is a possible way for a secondary user to disable the primary user's deceptive app scanning setting due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges...

CVE-2025-26435

In updateState of ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java, there is a possible way for a secondary user to disable the primary user's deceptive app scanning setting due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges...

CVE-2025-26435

In updateState of ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java, there is a possible way for a secondary user to disable the primary user's deceptive app scanning setting due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges...

CVE-2025-26435

CVE-2025-26435 affects ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java and is due to a logic error in updateState that could allow a secondary user to disable the primary user's app scanning setting, enabling local privilege escalation without additional privileges or user interaction. The entry...