Lucene search
+L

4 matches found

NVD
NVD
•added 2026/06/25 7:16 a.m.•24 views

CVE-2026-12490

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port and not the tls-auth-port or over over TCP over the regular...

8.2CVSS0.00216EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
OSV
OSV
•added 2026/06/25 7:16 a.m.•17 views

ALPINE-CVE-2026-12490

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port and not the tls-auth-port or over over TCP over the regular...

7.5CVSS5.9AI score0.00216EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
AlpineLinux
AlpineLinux
•added 2026/06/25 5:24 a.m.•36 views

CVE-2026-12490

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port and not the tls-auth-port or over over TCP over the regular...

8.2CVSS5.9AI score0.00216EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2026/06/25 12:00 a.m.•25 views

PT-2026-52212

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions The product name cannot be determined affected versions not specified Description An issue exists where a secondary requesting a transfer does not need to provide a client certificate when the request is made over TLS via the regular tls-port...

8.8CVSS5.8AI score0.00487EPSS
SaveExploits0References31
Rows per page
Query Builder