CVE-2026-5466

wolfSSL's ECCSI signature verifier wcVerifyEccsiHash decodes the r and s scalars from the signature blob via mpreadunsignedbin with no check that they lie in 1, q-1. A crafted forged signature could verify against any message for any identity, using only publicly-known constants...

wolfSSL（CyaSSL） 安全漏洞

wolfSSL CyaSSL is a small, portable embedded SSL programming library developed by the American company wolfSSL, aimed at developers working with embedded systems. There is a security vulnerability in wolfSSL, where the ECCSI signature verifier does not check the scalar range, allowing specially...

GHSA-P53J-G8PW-4W5F Ed25519 Signature Malleability in ed25519-java Due to Missing Scalar Range Check

The implementation of EdDSA in EdDSA-Java aka ed25519-java through 0.3.0 exhibits signature malleability and does not satisfy the SUF-CMA Strong Existential Unforgeability under Chosen Message Attacks property. This allows attackers to create new valid signatures different from previous signature...

SUSE CVE-2019-11235

FreeRADIUS before 3.0.19 mishandles the "each participant verifies that the received scalar is within a range, and that the received group element is a valid point on the curve being used" protection mechanism, aka a "Dragonblood" issue, a similar issue to CVE-2019-9498 and CVE-2019-9499...

nettle: Out of bounds memory access in signature verification

A flaw was found in Nettle, where several Nettle signature verification functions GOST DSA, EDDSA & ECDSA result in the Elliptic Curve Cryptography point ECC multiply function being called with out-of-range scalers, possibly resulting in incorrect results. This flaw allows an attacker to force an...

DEBIAN-CVE-2019-11235

FreeRADIUS before 3.0.19 mishandles the "each participant verifies that the received scalar is within a range, and that the received group element is a valid point on the curve being used" protection mechanism, aka a "Dragonblood" issue, a similar issue to CVE-2019-9498 and CVE-2019-9499...

ALPINE-CVE-2019-11235

FreeRADIUS before 3.0.19 mishandles the "each participant verifies that the received scalar is within a range, and that the received group element is a valid point on the curve being used" protection mechanism, aka a "Dragonblood" issue, a similar issue to CVE-2019-9498 and CVE-2019-9499...

UBUNTU-CVE-2019-11235

FreeRADIUS before 3.0.19 mishandles the "each participant verifies that the received scalar is within a range, and that the received group element is a valid point on the curve being used" protection mechanism, aka a "Dragonblood" issue, a similar issue to CVE-2019-9498 and CVE-2019-9499...