Solmate safetransfer and safetransferfrom does not check the codesize of the token address, which may lead to fund loss

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Possible miscalculation and loss of funds. Proof of Concept In AstariaRouter.commitToLiens, the safetransfer and safetransferfrom doesn’t check the existence of code at the token address. This is a known issue while using solmate’s libraries.Hence this m...

settleAuction() Check for status errors

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact ClearingHouse.safeTransferFrom to execute successfully even if there is no bid Proof of Concept settleAuction is called at the end of the auction and will check if the status is legal function settleAuctionuint256 collateralId public if...

Use safeTransefer and safeTransferfrom

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact and Recommended Mitigation Steps CErc20.sol Transfers are not safe because there is no checking whether the return value is true/false without use of Openzeppelins safeTransfer/safeTransferFrom. Should use the...

PUNK does not conform to ERC721 standard hence safeTransferFrom from solmate does not work

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Since protocol's intended NFT target is PUNK currently, the protocol will be hugely affected. Proof of Concept Attempts to transfer the NFT is done in 2 places. 1. removeCollateral 2. purchaseNFT Firstly, this means that once a collateral is added to the...

Some NFTs could be possibly stuck and can not be withdrawn when removing the collateral

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When adding a collateral, the protocol transfers the NFT from the user to the contract by calling ERC721's transferFrom, and when removing the collateral, safeTransferFrom is called to allow for onReceive hook to be triggered as intended by the protocol...

Using safeTransferFrom() Functions But without Getting the Approval

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact 2 safeTransferFrom calls are Used for ERC20 Token Line: 90, 172 using SafeTransferLib But without getting the Approval using safeApprove function. The Calls will always fail. 3 more safeTransferFrom calls are Used for ERC721 Tokens Line: 239, 259, 370...

The transferFrom() method is used instead of safeTransferFrom(), which I assume is a gas-saving measure. I however argue that this isn’t recommended because:

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability Detail OpenZeppelin’s documentation discourages the use of transferFrom; use safeTransferFrom whenever possible The recipient could have logic in the startDraw, fwinnerClaimNFT, lastResortTimelockOwnerClaimNFT, function src/VRFNFTRandomDraw.sol-18...

winnerClaimNFT() does not check if recipient can receive ERC721

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In src\VRFNFTRandomDraw.sol winnerClaimNFT, you should use safeTransferFrom to protect against the case that the recipient cannot receive the ERC721 tokens, and thus will lose the tokens. This is more-so the case when we expect that normal users will be...

Use safeTransferFrom instead of transferFrom for ERC721 transfers

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the contract VRFNFTRandomDraw.sol every transfer of ERC721 are done with the transferFrom instead of the recommended safeTransferFrom. This transferFrom does not check whether the receiver is capable of proper handling of NFTs. Proof of Concept If the...

Solmate saftransfer and safetransferfrom does not check the codesize of the token address, which may lead to fund loss

Lines of code Vulnerability details In PirexGmx.sol and ERC4626Vault.sol, the contract uses the solmate library which does not check the existence of code at the token address. This is a known issue when using solmate's libraries. Reference: Impact Possible loss of funds and miscalculation. Proof...

Solmate's safeTransfer function does not check the existence of the contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Miscalculation of transferred funds and finally, loss of funds Proof of Concept Solmate's safeTransfer and safeTransferFrom functions do not check the ext code size of the address of the recipient and so, it may lead to a miscalculation of funds as it...

Solmate safetransfer and safetransferfrom doesnot check the codesize of the token address, which may lead to fund loss

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In bid function, the safetransferfrom function doesn't check the existence of code at the token address. This is a known issue while using solmate's libraries. Hence this may lead to miscalculation of funds and may lead to loss of funds , because if...

msg.sender token balance is not checked before calling safeTransferFrom function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact createAuction FUNCTION and bid FUNCTION: Without checking the msg.sender token balance the transfer function may be failed to transfer token from msg.sender to contract address . this may cause a transactions failures. Same instance in 2 times PROOF OF...

arbitrary send erc20 safeTransferFrom

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact uses arbitrary from in safeTransferFrom when msg.sender is not used as from in safeTransferFrom. Proof of Concept Alice approves this contract to spend her ERC20 tokens. Bob can call a and specify Alice's address as the from parameter in safeTransferFrom...

MED - Incorrect implementation of ERC721 may have bad consequences for receiver

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description HolographERC721.sol is an enforcer contract that fully implements ERC721. In its safeTransferFromFunction there is the following code: if isContractto require ERC165to.supportsInterfaceERC165.supportsInterface.selector &&...

Upgraded Q -> M from 889 [1666366016998]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 889 as Medium risk. The relevant finding follows: L-05 safeTransferFrom of VoteEscrowCore does not fully comply ERC721 standard Per , safeTransferFrom needs to throw if the receiver is a contract that does not have the onERC721Received function that returns...

Upgraded Q -> M from 330 [1666367006171]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 330 as Medium risk. The relevant finding follows: GolomTrader is not using ERC721 safeTransferFrom when transferring tokens All the functions that fill orders are not using safeTransferFrom when the owner of the NFT transfer the token to the user or contract th...

Upgraded Q -> M from 207 [1666364300864]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 207 as Medium risk. The relevant finding follows: L-03 Use safeTransferFrom for ERC721 tokens Description As OpenZeppelin recommends, the transferFrom function should not be used for transferring ERC721 NFT tokens and instead the safeTransferFrom function shoul...

Upgraded Q -> M from 236 [1666363743332]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 236 as Medium risk. The relevant finding follows: ERC721 token can be lost in fillAsk PROBLEM When a user fills an ask order by calling fillAsk, the ERC721.transferFrom method is used to transfer the NFT to the receiver. Should the receiver be a smart contract...

Upgraded Q -> M from 400 [1666366553858]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 400 as Medium risk. The relevant finding follows: Use safeTransferFrom instead of transferFrom transferFrom can be replaced with safeTransferFrom as it makes sure that the receiver can handle ERC721 tokens and prevents it from being stuck in the contracts Refer...