Compounding is vulnerable to sandwich attack

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function compound is called in every deposit/withdraw in AutoPxGmx contract. It claim rewards in form of gmxBaseReward and swap them to gmx token. They used amountOutMinimum from input params gmxAmountOut = SWAPROUTER.exactInputSingle...

Information Disclosure

H2 Database Engine is vulnerable to information disclosure. The vulnerability is caused by the webAdminPassword argument, which allows an administrator to specify the password in plaintext. An attacker can get the password for the H2 web admin console by looking at the running processes...

Users can block other users from redeeming their ETH in Vaults

Lines of code Vulnerability details The burnLPToken of a protected vault allow users to burn LP tokens in exchange of ETH or dETH. In the case of ETH, ie when the BLS key has not had its derivatives minted yet, the function checks the liquidity is not fresh by checking...

Theft of ETH that was not used for the successful execution of orders

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description There are execute and bulkExecute functions in Exchange smart contract. There is the refund of any ETH that was unused for example that was left due to the unsuccessful order execution at the end of its execution flow: returnDust; returnDust functio...

Reentrancy attack on fee transferring

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability details Description There is execute function in the Exchange smart contract. The function matches two orders, ensuring the validity of the match, transfers the order fees, etc. When transferring fees, the contract just makes a call to the...

Public to all funds escape

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description The LooksRareAggregator smart contract implements a bunch of functions to escape funds by the contract owner see rescueETH, rescueERC20, rescueERC721, and rescueERC1155. In this way, any funds that were accidentally sent to the contract or were lock...

Theft of ETH that was not used for successful execution of orders in non-atomic execution

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description There is an execute function in LooksRareAggregator contract. It refunds any ETH that was unused for example that left due to the unsuccessful execution of an order at the end of its execution flow: returnETHIfAnyoriginator; returnETHIfAny function ...

CVE-2022-31255

An Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory 'Path Traversal' vulnerability in spacewalk/Uyuni of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for SUSE Manager Server 4.2, SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for SUSE Manager Server 4.3, SUSE Manager Server 4.2 allows remote attackers to read files...

SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 路径遍历漏洞

SUSE Linux Enterprise Server is a suite of enterprise server edition Linux operating systems from SUSE Germany. A path traversal vulnerability exists in SUSE Linux Enterprise Server. A remote attacker could use this vulnerability to read the files of a user running a process. The following produc...

Unsafe Initializations Of Bridge Contracts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability Details During the zkSync initialization process, several complicated tasks would be required to execute. Incorrect configurations in some tasks could lead to unexpected vulnerabilities. One task of the zkSync initialization process is deploying a...

Front-running of bid calls

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description There is bid function in the SizeSealed contract. The function accepts the auctionId, which does not contain any information about the auction itself. As a result, transactions of users can be front-runned to enforce them bid for the auction with th...

Front-running of a pledge call

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description There is pledge function in the WardenPledge contract. The function accepts the pledgeId, which does not contain any information about the pledge itself. As a result, transactions of users can be front-runned to enforce them use the pledge with the...

SimpleERC20Escrow's initialize() can be frontrun

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The user's collateral is not held in the market contract but is instead held in individual escrows. Every user has a unique escrow for every market. And the escrow contracts are created via the Market contract's createEscrow function. And it's initialize...

Approve front-running attack in DBR.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker could front-run an approve transaction to get an overall bigger amount approved. Proof of Concept This is the approve function of the DBR token. function approveaddress spender, uint256 amount public virtual returns bool...

Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master 访问控制错误漏洞

Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master is a device used to simplify and automate the monitoring of critical equipment from Delta Electronics Taiwan, China. An access control error vulnerability exists in Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master 00.00.01a and prior versions, which stems from...

Important: Red Hat Security Advisory: kpatch-patch security update

An update for kpatch-patch is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System CVSS base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability...

it is possible to front run the deployHolographableContract and alter the configuration

Lines of code Vulnerability details deployHolographableContract uses abi.encodePacked to encode configuration data and make the hash . thats while when using abi.encodePacked instead of abi.encode with dynamic types may result in some issues...

untyped data signing

Lines of code Vulnerability details in function deployHolographableContract the bytes32 hash is directly encoded without adding any domain separator . this will cause several issues an attacker can front run the signature and use them on same contract on another chain . eg a user wants to call...

LBPair swap() can be front-runned, a malicious attacker can call swap with higher gas than a user, getting the user swap amount transferred to the attacker address

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the LBPair.sol contract, when a user calls swap after transferring tokens to the Pair, a malicious attacker can front-run that tx then call swap on the same pair with the parameter to changed to an malicious address of his choice, paying a higher gass...

After pool is initialized, user can perform a sandwich attack through front-running and back-running mint transaction by calling swap function twice to manipulate initial price to be much different than market price and gain much more of output token than expected

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact After the following initialize function is called, the pool does not own any of the tokens at that moment since the mint function below is not called yet. When the mint transaction is sent, a malicious user can notice it in the mempool and front-run it b...