After pool is initialized, user can perform a sandwich attack through front-running and back-running mint transaction by calling swap function twice to manipulate initial price to be much different than market price and gain much more of output token than expected

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact After the following initialize function is called, the pool does not own any of the tokens at that moment since the mint function below is not called yet. When the mint transaction is sent, a malicious user can notice it in the mempool and front-run it b...

initialize function can be frontrunnable

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The initialize function has no access control implemented. Anyone can call the function. Due to this, an attacker may be able to frontrun the function and may cause unintended issues. Proof of Concept Tools Used Manual review Recommended Mitigation Steps...

Anyone who is malicious can front-run initialize transaction to set pool's initial price to a value that deviates quite a lot from market price, which discourages users from using the pool and makes the pool useless

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Calling the following initialize function sets the initial price for the pool. Setting the initial price to be similar to the current market price would encourage users to use the pool. Yet, the initialize transaction is vulnerable to front-running. For...

Missing slippage control system. Users may lose a lot of funds due to front-running MEV bots.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Missing slippage control system. Users may lose a lot of funds due to front-running MEV bots. It has liquidityDesired or amountRequired but these parameters are only used in output amount calculation. It isn't used to prevent the output amounts from...

upgradeRandProvider could be bricked if still waiting for seed

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The updgradeRandProvider function exists in case the chainlink randomness provider is phased out in the long term future. It is impossible to upgrade the randomness provider while the contract is still waiting for a seed. This is a reasonable thing to...

CVE-2022-28203

A denial-of-service issue was discovered in MediaWiki before 1.35.6, 1.36.x before 1.36.4, and 1.37.x before 1.37.2. When many files exist, requesting Special:NewFiles with actor as a condition can result in a very long running query...

Front-running of accept call

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description There is accept and veto functions in the PartyGovernance contract. The functions accepts the proposalId accept function also accepts snapIndex, which does not contain any information about the proposal itself. As a result, transactions of users can...

ERC20.sol is susceptible to classic ERC20 approve functionality front-running exploit

Lines of code Vulnerability details Proof of concept The problem is perfectly described here The tldr; is that if you approved a person to spend 100 tokens and then you want to decrease his allowance to 50, if he spends his 100 tokens allowance before you set his allowance to 50 he will be able t...

CVE-2022-28203

A denial-of-service issue was discovered in MediaWiki before 1.35.6, 1.36.x before 1.36.4, and 1.37.x before 1.37.2. When many files exist, requesting Special:NewFiles with actor as a condition can result in a very long running query...

PT-2022-33660 · Linux · Linux Kernel

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Linux Kernel versions prior to v5.15.66 Description: The issue is related to the IFORCE XMIT RUNNING flag in the Linux Kernel. It was introduced in version v2.6.33 and fixed in version v5.15.66. The actual impact and attack plausibility have...

PT-2022-33236 · Linux · Linux Kernel

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Linux Kernel versions prior to v5.19.8 Description: The issue is related to the IFORCE XMIT RUNNING flag in the Linux Kernel. It was introduced in version v2.6.33 and is fixed in version v5.19.8. The actual impact and attack plausibility have...

createBid call front-running

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description There is createBid function in the Auction contract. The function accept the tokenId, which does not contain any information about the token itself. As a result, transactions of users can be front-runned to enforce user make a bid for the token with...

VM2 Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

VM2 is a sandbox that can run untrusted code with built-in modules for whitelisted nodes. versions of VM2 prior to 3.9.11 have a remote code execution vulnerability that can be exploited by an attacker to bypass sandbox protection in order to gain remote code execution privileges on the host...

TRSRY: front-runnable setApprovalFor

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker may be able to withdraw more than intended Proof of Concept Let's say the alice had approval of 100. Now the treasury custodian reduced the approval to 50. Alice could frontrun the setApprovalFor of 50, and withdraw 100 as it was before. Then...

Governance functions relies on the proposal Id which says nothing about the proposal content

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There are submitProposal/endorseProposal/activateProposal functions on the Governance smart contract. The functions accept the proposed, which does not contain any information about the proposal. As a result, transactions of users can be front-ran. Proof...

Governance wrong vote

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description There is a function vote in OlympusGovernance smart contract. This function must accept a vote for or against a proposal. But it is possible that someone will wote not for the proposal he expected: this is possible to activate another proposal using...

TRSRY.sol is susceptible to ERC20 approve functionality front-running exploit

Lines of code Vulnerability details Proof of concept The problem is perfectly described here The tldr; is that if you approved a person to spend 100 tokens and then you want to decrease his allowance to 50, if he spends his 100 tokens allowance before you set his allowance to 50 he will be able t...

amra.mountainrunningaustralia.org Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-2868064

Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...

running-wild.de Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-2859489

Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...

Not calling approve(0) before setting a new approval might cause reverts when used with Tether (USDT)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Some tokens do not implement the ERC20 standard properly but are still accepted by most code that accepts ERC20 tokens. For example Tether USDT's approve function will revert if the current approval is not zero, to protect against front-running changes o...