PYSEC-2019-48

In RPyC 4.1.x through 4.1.1, a remote attacker can dynamically modify object attributes to construct a remote procedure call that executes code for an RPyC service with default configuration settings...

PYSEC-2019-118

In RPyC 4.1.x through 4.1.1, a remote attacker can dynamically modify object attributes to construct a remote procedure call that executes code for an RPyC service with default configuration settings...

CVE-2019-16328

In RPyC 4.1.x through 4.1.1, a remote attacker can dynamically modify object attributes to construct a remote procedure call that executes code for an RPyC service with default configuration settings...

CVE-2019-16328

In RPyC 4.1.x through 4.1.1, a remote attacker can dynamically modify object attributes to construct a remote procedure call that executes code for an RPyC service with default configuration settings...

CVE-2019-16328

CVE-2019-16328 affects RPyC 4.1.0–4.1.1 where a missing protocol security check allowed a remote attacker to construct a remote procedure call that could execute code in a custom RPyC service. OpenSUSE advisories confirm the issue is fixed in python-rpyc 4.1.5 (openSUSE-SU-2020:0763-1) and cite a...

Fuzzing and Data Manipulation Framework: Fuddly

Among the variety of complementary approaches used in the security evaluation of a target e.g. , software, an embedded equipment, etc. , fuzz testing—abbreviated fuzzing —is widely recognized as an effective means to help discovering security weaknesses in a target. Fuzzing is a software testing...