Lucene search
+L

806 matches found

Code423n4
Code423n4
โ€ขadded 2023/05/08 12:00 a.m.โ€ข13 views

Mitigation Confirmed for M-02

MITIGATION IS NOT CONFIRMED MITIGATION IS NOT CONFIRMED Mitigation of M-02: Issue not mitigated Link to Issue: code-423n4/2023-03-asymmetry-findings1049 Comment Issue M-02 describes an edge case in which the SfrxEth derivative may revert under an scenario where the calculation of the redeem amoun...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
OSV
OSV
โ€ขadded 2023/05/05 12:46 p.m.โ€ข8 views

USN-6055-2 ruby2.3, ruby2.5, ruby2.7 regression

USN-6055-1 fixed a vulnerability in Ruby. Unfortunately it introduced a regression. This update reverts the patches applied to CVE-2023-28755 in order to fix the regression pending further investigation. We apologize for the inconvenience. Original advisory details: It was discovered that Ruby...

5.3CVSS6.4AI score0.02637EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Code423n4
Code423n4
โ€ขadded 2023/05/04 12:00 a.m.โ€ข8 views

Upgraded Q -> 3 from #549 [1683219263333]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 549 as 3 risk. The relevant finding follows: L-02 Unsafe casting of uints Downcasting from uint256 in Solidity does not revert on overflow. This can easily result in undesired exploitation or bugs, since developers usually assume that overflows raise errors...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
โ€ขadded 2023/05/04 12:00 a.m.โ€ข8 views

Skipping indices of malicious strategies does not work

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In src/contracts/core/StrategyManager.solL536 parameter indicesToSkip per documentation: """exists so that, e.g., if the slashed QueuedWithdrawal contains a malicious strategy in the strategies array which always reverts on calls to its 'withdraw'...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
โ€ขadded 2023/04/28 12:00 a.m.โ€ข8 views

Incorrect implementation of RRUtils.serialNumberGte

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Comparing serial numbers should follow RFC1982 due to the possibility of numbers wrapping around. RRUtils.serialNumberGte tried to follow the RFC but failed to do so, leading to incorrect results in comparison. Proof of Concept For a serial number i1 to ...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
โ€ขadded 2023/04/28 12:00 a.m.โ€ข18 views

BytesUtils.keccak does not revert when offset is out of bounds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The BytesUtils.keccak function accepts out of bound offset value and returns a valid response without reverting. function keccak bytes memory self, uint256 offset, uint256 len internal pure returns bytes32 ret requireoffset + len = self.length; assembly...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
GithubExploit
GithubExploit
โ€ขadded 2023/04/27 11:49 a.m.โ€ข694 views

Exploit for SQL Injection in Prestashop

LabelGrup Networks, official PrestaShop Partner !LabelGrup L...

9.9CVSS7.5AI score0.01692EPSS
SaveExploits2
OSV
OSV
โ€ขadded 2023/04/24 10:33 p.m.โ€ข68 views

GHSA-W9G2-3W7P-72G9 Incorrect success value returned in vyper

Background During the audit of Lido's Gate Seals code statemind team identified a weird behavior of the code that uses rawcall: https://github.com/lidofinance/gate-seals/blob/051593e74df01a4131c485b4fda52e691cd4b7d8/contracts/GateSeal.vyL164 . Construction like this: vyper success = rawcall...

8.7CVSS7.1AI score0.00883EPSS
SaveExploits1References8
OSV
OSV
โ€ขadded 2023/04/24 10:15 p.m.โ€ข28 views

PYSEC-2023-131

Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.1 through 0.3.7, the Vyper compiler generates the wrong bytecode. Any contract that uses the rawcall with revertonfailure=False and maxoutsize=0 receives the wrong response from rawcall. Depending on the...

7.5CVSS7AI score0.00883EPSS
SaveExploits1References5
Veracode
Veracode
โ€ขadded 2023/04/24 2:52 a.m.โ€ข24 views

Interpretation Conflict

@openzeppelin/contracts is vulnerable to Interpretation Conflict. The vulnerability exists because the TransparentUpgradeableProxy clashing selector calls may not be delegated if the clashing function has a different signature with incompatible ABI encoding, which could lead to proxy revert while...

5.3CVSS5.4AI score0.00812EPSS
SaveExploits0References5Affected Software4
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
โ€ขadded 2023/04/24 12:00 a.m.โ€ข6 views

PT-2023-22826 ยท Vyper ยท Vyper

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Vyper versions 0.3.1 through 0.3.7 Description: The Vyper compiler generates the wrong bytecode in versions 0.3.1 through 0.3.7. Any contract that uses the raw call with revert on failure=False and max outsize=0 receives the wrong response fr...

8.7CVSS7.3AI score0.00883EPSS
SaveExploits1References13
Code423n4
Code423n4
โ€ขadded 2023/04/19 12:00 a.m.โ€ข7 views

Sound adjusting of a position could fail

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Increasing collateral and decreasing it's liquidation price, such that with new liquidation price and old collateral position is becoming unsound, leads to a revert. Such situation can happen often, imagine position that's fully minted and has market pri...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
โ€ขadded 2023/04/19 12:00 a.m.โ€ข11 views

can launch a challenge without any collateral in MintingHub.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact launchChallenge... function in MintingHub.sol ignores return value by challenge.position.collateral.transferFrom Several tokens do not revert in case of failure and return false. If the token used as collateral return false, the user can launch a challen...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
โ€ขadded 2023/04/19 12:00 a.m.โ€ข7 views

Position created with BNB as collateral will result in locked collateral

Lines of code Vulnerability details withdrawCollateral allows position owners to withdraw collateral from the position - as long as it is still collateralized afterwards. File: Position.sol 263: function withdrawCollateraladdress target, uint256 amount public onlyOwner noChallenge noCooldown 264:...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
โ€ขadded 2023/04/19 12:00 a.m.โ€ข15 views

Let Me Suggest For You

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Scope of vulnerabiliy - This vulnerability allows any user including users the do not own any share tokens to effectivly cast a veto on a minter suggetion. The only requirement to excecute the vulnerability is to have the minimun fee in the acccount. In...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
โ€ขadded 2023/04/03 12:00 a.m.โ€ข27 views

MuteBond is susceptible to DOS

Lines of code Vulnerability details Proof of Concept Observe that if timeToTokens is called with locktime = 1 week, amount 52, it will return 0. function timeToTokensuint256 amount, uint256 locktime internal pure returns uint256 uint256 weektime = 1 weeks; uint256 maxlock = 52 weeks;...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
โ€ขadded 2023/03/30 12:00 a.m.โ€ข13 views

Incorrect parameter in withdraw function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An incorrect parameter is used in the withdraw function in SfrxEth.sol. The amount variable is used when the frxEthBalance variable should be used to calculate minOut. The amount that gets swapped at the FRXETHCRVPOOLADDRESS is the frxEthBalance, not the...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
โ€ขadded 2023/03/30 12:00 a.m.โ€ข17 views

poolPrice in Reth.sol can overflow and revert

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact To determine the value of sqrtPriceX96 that will cause an overflow, we need to analyze the calculation in the function: sqrtPriceX96 uintsqrtPriceX96 1e18 96 2 The maximum value for a uint256 is 2^256 - 1. An overflow occurs when the result of the...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
โ€ขadded 2023/03/20 12:00 a.m.โ€ข20 views

KangarooVault.removeCollateral updates storage without actually removing collateral, resulting in lost collateral

Lines of code Vulnerability details The admin can call KangarooVault.addCollateral to add additional collateral to a Power Perp position. File: src/KangarooVault.sol 424: function addCollateraluint256 additionalCollateral external requiresAuth nonReentrant 425: SUSD.safeApproveaddressEXCHANGE,...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
โ€ขadded 2023/03/20 12:00 a.m.โ€ข12 views

Tray Owner Will Not be Able to Burn any Tray

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact 1. There are two issues here, the check namespaceNFT != msg.sender && trayOwner != msg.sender && getApprovedid != msg.sender && !isApprovedForAlltrayOwner, msg.sender will only revert CallerNotAllowedToBurn if all of the conditions are true which is very...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder