Lucene search
K

4 matches found

Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2023/12/19 12:0 a.m.•11 views

Unchecked return value of low-level call()/delegatecall()

Lines of code 120, 141, 411, 184, 160, 189, 152, 444, 625, 638https://github.com/Tapioca-DAO/tapioca-bar-audit/blob/2286f80f928f41c8bc189d0657d74ba83286c668/contract...

7.2AI score
Exploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2023/07/10 12:0 a.m.•16 views

Possible to stop trading

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact It's possible to stop market due to division by 0 exception. So better to prevent this, because better to revert with missing minAmountOut than revert with some error, which might be complicated to detect. Proof of Concept There is a change to withdraw a...

6.8AI score
Exploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/12/05 12:0 a.m.•10 views

CrossChainRelayerArbitrum contract: GasLimitTooHigh revert error not caught

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary The relayCalls function in the CrossChainRelayerArbitrum contract reverts when the gasLimit parameter is greater than the maxGasLimit, but it does not have a catch block to handle the error. As a result, the transaction will fail without providing any...

6.6AI score
Exploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/08/27 12:0 a.m.•11 views

Check the return of .call when sending Ether

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact It's considered a best practice to always check the return of the transaction when sending Ether with .call, since it's possible for a tx failure due to external factors out of the contract control. Currently, the contract emits an event with the result...

6.7AI score
Exploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder