IBM BigFix Platform 9.2.x < 9.2.15 / 9.5.x < 9.5.10 Multiple Vulnerabilities

According to its self-reported version, the IBM BigFix Platform application running on the remote host is 9.2.x prior to 9.2.15, or 9.5.x prior to 9.5.10. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities : - IBM BigFix Platform is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks, caused by...

CVE-2018-1474

IBM BigFix Platform 9.2.0 through 9.2.14 and 9.5 through 9.5.9 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and cause the server to return a split respons...

Cross site scripting

IBM BigFix Platform 9.2.0 through 9.2.14 and 9.5 through 9.5.9 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and cause the server to return a split respons...

CVE-2018-1474

IBM BigFix Platform 9.2.0 through 9.2.14 and 9.5 through 9.5.9 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and cause the server to return a split respons...

CVE-2018-1474

IBM BigFix Platform is affected by HTTP response splitting (CVE-2018-1474). Affected versions: 9.2.0–9.2.14 and 9.5–9.5.9. Exploitation could inject arbitrary HTTP headers, enabling cache poisoning or cross-site scripting. According to Nessus, remediation is to upgrade to 9.2.15 or 9.5.10. No add...

CVE-2018-1474

IBM BigFix Platform 9.2.0 through 9.2.14 and 9.5 through 9.5.9 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and cause the server to return a split respons...

CVE-2018-1474: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component

IBM BigFix Platform 9.2.0 through 9.2.14 and 9.5 through 9.5.9 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and cause the server to return a split respons...

JVN#32155106: Multiple vulnerabilities in i-FILTER

i-FILTER provided by Digital Arts Inc. contains multiple vulnerabilities listed below. Cross-site scripting CWE-79 - CVE-2018-16180 Version| Vector| Score ---|---|--- CVSS v3| CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N| Base Score: 6.1 CVSS v2| AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N| Base Score: 4.3 HTTP...

CVE-2018-11347

The YunoHost 2.7.2 through 2.7.14 web application is affected by one HTTP Response Header Injection. This flaw allows an attacker to inject, into the response from the server, one or several HTTP Header. It requires an interaction with the user to send him the malicious link. It could be used to...

CVE-2018-11347

The CVE-2018-11347 entry concerns the YunoHost web application (versions 2.7.2 through 2.7.14). Affected component/issue: HTTP Response Header Injection, enabling an attacker to inject one or more HTTP headers in server responses. Attack requirements: user interaction is needed (the attacker must...

CVE-2018-11347: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers

The YunoHost 2.7.2 through 2.7.14 web application is affected by one HTTP Response Header Injection. This flaw allows an attacker to inject, into the response from the server, one or several HTTP Header. It requires an interaction with the user to send him the malicious link. It could be used to...

PT-2018-10505

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions YunoHost versions 2.7.2 through 2.7.14 Description The issue allows an attacker to inject one or several HTTP Header into the response from the server. This requires an interaction with the user to send them a malicious link. It could be used ...

RHEL 7 : nodejs and nodejs-tough-cookie (RHSA-2016:2101)

The remote Redhat Enterprise Linux 7 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the RHSA-2016:2101 advisory. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is the company's cloud computing Platform-as-a-Service PaaS solution designed for on-premise or private...

Crlf injection

Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers 'HTTP Response Splitting' vulnerability exists in the embedded web servers in all Modicon M340, Premium, Quantum PLCs and BMXNOR0200 where a denial of service can occur for 1 minute by sending a specially crafted HTTP request...

CVE-2018-7830

Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers 'HTTP Response Splitting' vulnerability exists in the embedded web servers in all Modicon M340, Premium, Quantum PLCs and BMXNOR0200 where a denial of service can occur for 1 minute by sending a specially crafted HTTP request...

CVE-2018-7830

The CVE-2018-7830 entry applies to Schneider Electric Modicon embedded web servers (M340, Premium, Quantum PLCs and BMXNOR0200). It is a HTTP Response Splitting issue caused by improper neutralization of CRLF sequences in HTTP headers, leading to a denial of service for about one minute when a sp...

CVE-2018-7830

Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers 'HTTP Response Splitting' vulnerability exists in the embedded web servers in all Modicon M340, Premium, Quantum PLCs and BMXNOR0200 where a denial of service can occur for 1 minute by sending a specially crafted HTTP request...

CVE-2018-7830: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers

Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers 'HTTP Response Splitting' vulnerability exists in the embedded web servers in all Modicon M340, Premium, Quantum PLCs and BMXNOR0200 where a denial of service can occur for 1 minute by sending a specially crafted HTTP request...

ruby: HTTP response splitting in WEBrick

It was found that WEBrick did not sanitize headers sent back to clients, resulting in a response-splitting vulnerability. An attacker, able to control the server's headers, could force WEBrick into injecting additional headers to a client...

ruby: HTTP response splitting in WEBrick

It was found that WEBrick did not sanitize headers sent back to clients, resulting in a response-splitting vulnerability. An attacker, able to control the server's headers, could force WEBrick into injecting additional headers to a client...