3901 matches found
DEBIAN-CVE-2021-33621
The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object...
Design/Logic Flaw
The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object...
UBUNTU-CVE-2021-33621
The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object...
CVE-2021-33621
The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object...
Ruby 注入漏洞
Ruby is a cross-platform, object-oriented, dynamically typed programming language from the personal developer of Yukihiro Matsumoto. A security vulnerability exists in Ruby, which stems from a cgi gem that allows HTTP response splitting...
CVE-2021-33621
The CVE-2021-33621 entry concerns the Ruby CGI gem: HTTP response splitting in cgi-gem versions before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5. The underlying issue is in how untrusted input can affect an HTTP response or CGI::Cookie creation, enabling response-splitting exploits. Aff...
CVE-2021-33621
The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object...
CVE-2021-33621: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component
The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object...
CVE-2021-33621
The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object...
CVE-2021-33621
The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object...
CVE-2021-33621
The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object...
HTTP response splitting in CGI
cgi.rb in Ruby through 2.6.x, through 3.0x, and through 3.1.x allows HTTP header injection. If a CGI application using the CGI library inserts untrusted input into the HTTP response header, an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header, and inject malicious content to...
CVE-2022-20772
A vulnerability in Cisco Email Security Appliance ESA and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an HTTP response splitting attack. This vulnerability is due to the failure of the application or its environment to properly sanitize input...
CVE-2022-20772
A vulnerability in Cisco Email Security Appliance ESA and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an HTTP response splitting attack. This vulnerability is due to the failure of the application or its environment to properly sanitize input...
Design/Logic Flaw
A vulnerability in Cisco Email Security Appliance ESA and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an HTTP response splitting attack. This vulnerability is due to the failure of the application or its environment to properly sanitize input...
CVE-2022-20772
CVE-2022-20772 affects Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager. The issue is an HTTP Response Header Injection/HTTP response splitting caused by insufficient input sanitization, allowing an unauthenticated, remote attacker to inject headers and influence the re...
CVE-2022-20772
A vulnerability in Cisco Email Security Appliance ESA and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an HTTP response splitting attack. This vulnerability is due to the failure of the application or its environment to properly sanitize input...
CVE-2022-20772
A vulnerability in Cisco Email Security Appliance ESA and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an HTTP response splitting attack. This vulnerability is due to the failure of the application or its environment to properly sanitize input...
CVE-2022-20772: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers
A vulnerability in Cisco Email Security Appliance ESA and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an HTTP response splitting attack. This vulnerability is due to the failure of the application or its environment to properly sanitize input...
Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager (SMA) HTTP Response Header Injection (cisco-sa-ESA-HTTP-Inject-nvsycUmR)
According to its self-reported version, Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager SMA is affected by a vulnerability due to a failure to sanitize input values. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit this, by injecting malicious HTTP headers, in order to conduct an HTTP response splitting attack...