Lucene search
+L

3901 matches found

OSV
OSV
•added 2022/11/18 11:15 p.m.•4 views

DEBIAN-CVE-2021-33621

The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object...

8.8CVSS6.7AI score0.0244EPSS
SaveExploits1References1
Prion
Prion
•added 2022/11/18 11:15 p.m.•243 views

Design/Logic Flaw

The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object...

6.5CVSS8.4AI score0.0244EPSS
SaveExploits1References7Affected Software3
OSV
OSV
•added 2022/11/18 11:15 p.m.•19 views

UBUNTU-CVE-2021-33621

The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object...

8.8CVSS6.8AI score0.0244EPSS
SaveExploits1References9
UbuntuCve
UbuntuCve
•added 2022/11/18 11:15 p.m.•38 views

CVE-2021-33621

The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object...

8.8CVSS6.8AI score0.0244EPSS
SaveExploits1References8
CNNVD
CNNVD
•added 2022/11/18 12:00 a.m.•8 views

Ruby 注入漏洞

Ruby is a cross-platform, object-oriented, dynamically typed programming language from the personal developer of Yukihiro Matsumoto. A security vulnerability exists in Ruby, which stems from a cgi gem that allows HTTP response splitting...

8.8CVSS7.3AI score0.0244EPSS
SaveExploits1References13
CVE
CVE
•added 2022/11/18 12:00 a.m.•982 views

CVE-2021-33621

The CVE-2021-33621 entry concerns the Ruby CGI gem: HTTP response splitting in cgi-gem versions before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5. The underlying issue is in how untrusted input can affect an HTTP response or CGI::Cookie creation, enabling response-splitting exploits. Aff...

8.8CVSS8.6AI score0.0244EPSS
SaveExploits1References8Affected Software1
Debian CVE
Debian CVE
•added 2022/11/18 12:00 a.m.•42 views

CVE-2021-33621

The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object...

8.8CVSS7.3AI score0.0244EPSS
SaveExploits1
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2022/11/18 12:00 a.m.•2 views

CVE-2021-33621: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component

The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object...

8.8CVSS5.8AI score0.0244EPSS
SaveExploits1References2
Mend
Mend
•added 2022/11/18 12:00 a.m.•4 views

CVE-2021-33621

The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object...

8.8CVSS0.0244EPSS
SaveExploits1References22
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2022/11/18 12:00 a.m.•36 views

CVE-2021-33621

The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object...

8.9AI score0.0244EPSS
SaveExploits1References7
AlpineLinux
AlpineLinux
•added 2022/11/18 12:00 a.m.•88 views

CVE-2021-33621

The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object...

8.8CVSS9AI score0.0244EPSS
SaveExploits1
RubySec
RubySec
•added 2022/11/18 12:00 a.m.•45 views

HTTP response splitting in CGI

cgi.rb in Ruby through 2.6.x, through 3.0x, and through 3.1.x allows HTTP header injection. If a CGI application using the CGI library inserts untrusted input into the HTTP response header, an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header, and inject malicious content to...

8.8CVSS7.3AI score0.0244EPSS
SaveExploits1References1Affected Software1
OSV
OSV
•added 2022/11/04 6:15 p.m.•15 views

CVE-2022-20772

A vulnerability in Cisco Email Security Appliance ESA and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an HTTP response splitting attack. This vulnerability is due to the failure of the application or its environment to properly sanitize input...

5.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00603EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
NVD
NVD
•added 2022/11/04 6:15 p.m.•19 views

CVE-2022-20772

A vulnerability in Cisco Email Security Appliance ESA and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an HTTP response splitting attack. This vulnerability is due to the failure of the application or its environment to properly sanitize input...

5.3CVSS0.00603EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Prion
Prion
•added 2022/11/04 6:15 p.m.•23 views

Design/Logic Flaw

A vulnerability in Cisco Email Security Appliance ESA and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an HTTP response splitting attack. This vulnerability is due to the failure of the application or its environment to properly sanitize input...

5CVSS5.4AI score0.00603EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software2
CVE
CVE
•added 2022/11/03 7:32 p.m.•93 views

CVE-2022-20772

CVE-2022-20772 affects Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager. The issue is an HTTP Response Header Injection/HTTP response splitting caused by insufficient input sanitization, allowing an unauthenticated, remote attacker to inject headers and influence the re...

5.3CVSS5.3AI score0.00603EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software1
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2022/11/03 7:32 p.m.•33 views

CVE-2022-20772

A vulnerability in Cisco Email Security Appliance ESA and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an HTTP response splitting attack. This vulnerability is due to the failure of the application or its environment to properly sanitize input...

4.7CVSS5.6AI score0.00603EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2022/11/03 7:32 p.m.•16 views

CVE-2022-20772

A vulnerability in Cisco Email Security Appliance ESA and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an HTTP response splitting attack. This vulnerability is due to the failure of the application or its environment to properly sanitize input...

4.7CVSS7.3AI score0.00603EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2022/11/03 12:00 a.m.•3 views

CVE-2022-20772: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers

A vulnerability in Cisco Email Security Appliance ESA and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an HTTP response splitting attack. This vulnerability is due to the failure of the application or its environment to properly sanitize input...

5.3CVSS6.1AI score0.00603EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Tenable Nessus
Tenable Nessus
•added 2022/11/03 12:00 a.m.•24 views

Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager (SMA) HTTP Response Header Injection (cisco-sa-ESA-HTTP-Inject-nvsycUmR)

According to its self-reported version, Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager SMA is affected by a vulnerability due to a failure to sanitize input values. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit this, by injecting malicious HTTP headers, in order to conduct an HTTP response splitting attack...

5.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00603EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Rows per page
Query Builder