Important: ruby24

Issue Overview: Ruby through 2.4.7, 2.5.x through 2.5.6, and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 allows HTTP Response Splitting. If a program using WEBrick inserts untrusted input into the response header, an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header, and inject malicious content to...

Amazon Linux AMI : ruby24 (ALAS-2020-1422)

The version of ruby24 installed on the remote host is prior to 2.4.10-2.12. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the ALAS-2020-1422 advisory. Ruby through 2.4.7, 2.5.x through 2.5.6, and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 allows HTTP Response Splitting. If a program using...

HTTP Response Splitting

undertow is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting. The vulnerability exists as in EAP, the field-name is not parsed in accordance to RFC7230...

HTTP response splitting in uvicorn

Uvicorn before 0.11.7 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting. CRLF sequences are not escaped in the value of HTTP headers. Attackers can exploit exploit this to add arbitrary headers to HTTP responses, or even return an arbitrary response body, whenever crafted input is used to construct HTTP...

GHSA-F97H-2PFX-F59F HTTP response splitting in uvicorn

Uvicorn before 0.11.7 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting. CRLF sequences are not escaped in the value of HTTP headers. Attackers can exploit exploit this to add arbitrary headers to HTTP responses, or even return an arbitrary response body, whenever crafted input is used to construct HTTP...

CRLF Injection

uvicorn is vulnerable to CRLF injection. An attacker is able to inject carriage return and line feed characters into an HTTP response and perform HTTP response splitting attacks...

DEBIAN-CVE-2020-7695

Uvicorn before 0.11.7 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting. CRLF sequences are not escaped in the value of HTTP headers. Attackers can exploit this to add arbitrary headers to HTTP responses, or even return an arbitrary response body, whenever crafted input is used to construct HTTP headers...

CVE-2020-7695

Uvicorn before 0.11.7 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting. CRLF sequences are not escaped in the value of HTTP headers. Attackers can exploit this to add arbitrary headers to HTTP responses, or even return an arbitrary response body, whenever crafted input is used to construct HTTP headers...

CVE-2020-7695

Uvicorn before 0.11.7 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting. CRLF sequences are not escaped in the value of HTTP headers. Attackers can exploit this to add arbitrary headers to HTTP responses, or even return an arbitrary response body, whenever crafted input is used to construct HTTP headers...

CVE-2020-7695

Uvicorn before 0.11.7 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting. CRLF sequences are not escaped in the value of HTTP headers. Attackers can exploit this to add arbitrary headers to HTTP responses, or even return an arbitrary response body, whenever crafted input is used to construct HTTP headers...

Design/Logic Flaw

Uvicorn before 0.11.7 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting. CRLF sequences are not escaped in the value of HTTP headers. Attackers can exploit this to add arbitrary headers to HTTP responses, or even return an arbitrary response body, whenever crafted input is used to construct HTTP headers...

PYSEC-2020-151

Uvicorn before 0.11.7 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting. CRLF sequences are not escaped in the value of HTTP headers. Attackers can exploit this to add arbitrary headers to HTTP responses, or even return an arbitrary response body, whenever crafted input is used to construct HTTP headers...

PYSEC-2020-151

Uvicorn before 0.11.7 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting. CRLF sequences are not escaped in the value of HTTP headers. Attackers can exploit this to add arbitrary headers to HTTP responses, or even return an arbitrary response body, whenever crafted input is used to construct HTTP headers...

UBUNTU-CVE-2020-7695

Uvicorn before 0.11.7 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting. CRLF sequences are not escaped in the value of HTTP headers. Attackers can exploit this to add arbitrary headers to HTTP responses, or even return an arbitrary response body, whenever crafted input is used to construct HTTP headers...

CVE-2020-7695

Uvicorn before 0.11.7 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting. CRLF sequences are not escaped in the value of HTTP headers. Attackers can exploit this to add arbitrary headers to HTTP responses, or even return an arbitrary response body, whenever crafted input is used to construct HTTP headers...

CVE-2020-7695

CVE-2020-7695 affects Uvicorn before 0.11.7. The issue is an HTTP response splitting vulnerability where CRLF sequences are not escaped in header values, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary headers or even craft an arbitrary response body when input is used to build HTTP headers. The availab...

CVE-2020-7695 HTTP Response Splitting

Uvicorn before 0.11.7 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting. CRLF sequences are not escaped in the value of HTTP headers. Attackers can exploit this to add arbitrary headers to HTTP responses, or even return an arbitrary response body, whenever crafted input is used to construct HTTP headers...

PT-2020-19718 · None · Uvicorn

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Uvicorn versions prior to 0.11.7 Description: The issue allows attackers to exploit HTTP response splitting by adding arbitrary headers to HTTP responses or returning an arbitrary response body when crafted input is used to construct HTTP...

HTTP Response Splitting

Overview uvicorn is a lightning-fast ASGI server. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to HTTP Response Splitting. Uvicorn's implementation of the HTTP protocol for the httptools parser is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting. CRLF sequences are not escaped in the value of HTTP...

undertow: HTTP header injection using CRLF with UTF-8 Encoding (incomplete fix of CVE-2016-4993)

It was found that the fix for CVE-2016-4993 was incomplete and Undertow web server is vulnerable to the injection of arbitrary HTTP headers, and also response splitting, due to insufficient sanitization and validation of user input before the input is used as part of an HTTP header value...