PT-2023-2003 · Node.Js +7 · Node.Js +7

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Node.js versions prior to 19.6.1 Node.js versions prior to 18.14.1 Node.js versions prior to 16.19.1 Node.js versions prior to 14.21.3 Description: A privilege escalation issue exists, related to errors in authorization. This issue can be...

SUSE CVE-2004-1020

The addslashes function in PHP 4.3.9 does not properly escape a NULL /0 character, which may allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files in PHP applications that contain a directory traversal vulnerability in require or include statements, but are otherwise protected by the magicquotesgpc...

SUSE CVE-2005-2963

The modauthshadow module 1.0 through 1.5 and 2.0 for Apache with AuthShadow enabled uses shadow authentication for all locations that use the require group directive, even when other authentication mechanisms are specified, which might allow remote authenticated users to bypass security...

SUSE CVE-2015-3185

The apsomeauthrequired function in server/request.c in the Apache HTTP Server 2.4.x before 2.4.14 does not consider that a Require directive may be associated with an authorization setting rather than an authentication setting, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions ...

SUSE CVE-2016-1672

The ModuleSystem::RequireForJsInner function in extensions/renderer/modulesystem.cc in the extension bindings in Google Chrome before 51.0.2704.63 mishandles properties, which allows remote attackers to conduct bindings-interception attacks and bypass the Same Origin Policy via unspecified vector...

SUSE CVE-2018-5175

A mechanism to bypass Content Security Policy CSP protections on sites that have a "script-src" policy of "'strict-dynamic'". If a target website contains an HTML injection flaw an attacker could inject a reference to a copy of the "require.js" library that is part of Firefox's Developer Tools, a...

SUSE CVE-2020-1955

CouchDB version 3.0.0 shipped with a new configuration setting that governs access control to the entire database server called requirevaliduserexceptforup. It was meant as an extension to the long standing setting requirevaliduser, which in turn requires that any and all requests to CouchDB will...

[SECURITY] Fedora 37 Update: php-symfony4-4.4.50-1.fc37

Symfony PHP framework version 4. NOTE: Does not require PHPUnit bridge...

Unchecked that the to address is nto the address of the tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the swap function, it is unchecked that the to address is not the address of the tokens. This will not lead to a loss of funds because the flashloan will actually revert, but sanity checks like this one should be made following for instance uniswap...

Bad modifier definition

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The modifiers holding the name "onlyMinter", defined in the "contracts/RabbitHoleReceipt.sol" and "contracts/RabbitHoleTickets.sol" files do not implement an if or require checks. The lack of checking means that the modifiers do nothing about regulating...

Lack of input validation: The contract does not perform any checks on the inputs passed to the functions, which could allow an attacker to pass malicious data and trigger wrong behavior or errors.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact function readInt208 ReturndataPointer rdPtr internal pure returns int208 value assembly returndatacopy0, rdPtr, 0x20 value := mload0 This function reads the int208 at rdPtr in returndata. However, it does not perform any checks on the input rdPtr to ensu...

Unhandled Revert in _performERC721Transfer Function Resulting in Loss of Tokens.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact transferFrom function is used to transfer ownership of ERC721 tokens from one address to another. If this function reverts, it means that the transfer failed, and the ownership of the tokens should not be changed. However, the code in the...

Missing require statement for sellAmount in init() function leading to potential loss of funds.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact init function is missing a require statement to check if the input variable sellAmount is less than or equal to the contract's balance of sell tokens. This means that the contract is allowing the user to initiate an auction with a sell amount greater tha...

java-11-openjdk security and bug fix update

1:11.0.18.0.10-1 - Update to jdk-11.0.18+10 GA - Update release notes to 11.0.18+10 - Switch to GA mode for release - This tarball is embargoed until 2023-01-17 @ 1pm PT. - Related: rhbz2157797 1:11.0.18.0.9-0.2.ea - Update to jdk-11.0.18+9 - Update release notes to 11.0.18+9 - Drop local copy of...

Attacker can take control over each SmartAccount proxy and steal all users' funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Attacker can take control over each SmartAccount proxy and steal all users' funds Impact All users' funds can be stolen by a single attacker tx gas cost only Proof of Concept There are 2 main reasons for this vulnerability: The .checkSignatures in...

Contract cannot be initialized due to revert

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact TokenggAVAX.initialize would revert due to the constructor setting initialized to typeuint8.max = 255 thus making initialized not less than 1. This does not pass the require check in initializer modifier, thus resulting to a revert thereby making...

The LPDA will fail, because the Arithmetic underflow

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The LPDA will fail to buy mint new NFTs even if block.timestamp = temp.startTime , block.timestamp = temp.endTime and newId sale.dropPerSecond sale.endTime - sale.startTime, "INVALID DROP PER SECOND"; --- The text was updated successfully, but th...

setRelayer function not checking for null relayer address

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary When calling the setRelayer function with a null relayer address, the function does not check for this and allows the address to be set. This issue can cause the contract to fail when calling the executeCalls function and potentially cause loss of funds...

Relayer/executor-already-set Error in CrossChainRelayerArbitrum Contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary The setExecutor function in the CrossChainRelayerArbitrum contract improperly reverts when the executor variable has already been set. Impact This bug could prevent the CrossChainRelayerArbitrum contract from properly setting the executor variable,...

1) THERE IS CONFLICT IN REQUIRE STATMENT. IN finalizeDeposit FUNCTION CHECKS require (msg.sender == l1Bridge, "mq"). IN bridgeMint FUNCTION IMPLEMENTATIONS onlyBridge Modifier CHECKS require(msg.sender == l2Bridge).

Lines of code Vulnerability details 1. Impact Let assume if we calling bridgeMint from finalizeDeposit function the msg.sender is l1bridge . if the msg.sender is not l1bridge can't run the finalizeDeposit but as per bridgeMint the msg.sender should be l2bridge. So it will cause the conflict . the...