Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2014. Notes: none...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2014. Notes: none...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2014. Notes: none...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2010. Notes: none...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2014. Notes: none...

CVE-2012-4800

This CVE entry is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability entry.

CVE-2015-6881

CVE-2015-6881 entry is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability.

CVE-2016-0066

CVE-2016-0066 is rejected and not used; this candidate does not represent an active vulnerability entry.

CVE-2014-2344

The CVE-2014-2344 entry is rejected/not used; this ID does not represent an active vulnerability.

CVE-2013-0628

CVE-2013-0628 is rejected and not used; it does not represent an active vulnerability entry.

CVE-2013-6252

CVE-2013-6252 entry is rejected per the Initial Description.

CVE-2015-6235

CVE-2015-6235 entry is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability.

CVE-2006-5691

CVE-2006-5691 entry is rejected and not associated with a vulnerability.

SysGauge 1.5.18 Buffer Overflow

Exploit Title: SysGauge 1.5.18 a buffer overflow in SMTP connection verification function leads to code execution Date: 2017-02-28 Exploit Author: Peter Baris Vendor Homepage: http://www.saptech-erp.com.au Software Link: http://www.sysgauge.com/setups/sysgaugesetupv1.5.18.exe Version: 1.5.18 Test...

tomcat: Session fixation

A session fixation flaw was found in the way Tomcat recycled the requestedSessionSSL field. If at least one web application was configured to use the SSL session ID as the HTTP session ID, an attacker could reuse a previously used session ID for further requests...

tomcat: Session fixation

A session fixation flaw was found in the way Tomcat recycled the requestedSessionSSL field. If at least one web application was configured to use the SSL session ID as the HTTP session ID, an attacker could reuse a previously used session ID for further requests...