CVE-2026-8993

D.Launcher 2 component of Slovak eID client ecosystem contains Improper URL Handler Processing vulnerability. Application registers multiple custom URL handlers that could be exploited to initiate full NTLM autentication or SMB connection to attacker infrastructure and to conduct SSRF Server Side...

CVE-2026-2237

A use of get request method with sensitive query strings vulnerability in volume encryption of Synology Storage Manager package before 1.0.1-1100 allows local users on Windows to obtain sensitive information...

CVE-2026-4071

The BirdSeed plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.0. This is due to missing nonce validation in the birdseedpluginsettingspage function. The function processes the 'birdseedtoken' GET parameter and saves it to the database via...

Security update for xorg-x11-server

This update for xorg-x11-server fixes the following issues CreateSaverWindow Use-After-Free Information Disclosure. bsc1266301 DRI2 DRIGetBuffers/DRIGetBuffersWithFormat Out-Of-Bounds Write. bsc1266302 Font Alias Stack-based Buffer Overflow. bsc1266294 GLX ChangeDrawableAttributes Out-Of-Bounds...

Libsoup: libsoup: http request smuggling via unsigned to signed conversion error

...

CVE-2026-9722

The CVE-2026-9722 entry concerns the WordPress plugin Laiser Tag, affected versions ≤ 1.2.5. The root cause is missing or incorrect nonce validation in the addOptionsPageFields function, enabling Cross-Site Request Forgery. This allows unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings (API key,...

CVE-2026-9722

The Laiser Tag plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the addOptionsPageFields function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's...

CVE-2026-9722 Laiser Tag <= 1.2.5 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Plugin Settings Update via Settings Form

The Laiser Tag plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the addOptionsPageFields function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's...

EUVD-2026-33899

The Laiser Tag plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the addOptionsPageFields function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's...

CVE-2026-9722 Laiser Tag <= 1.2.5 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Plugin Settings Update via Settings Form

The Laiser Tag plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the addOptionsPageFields function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's...

CVE-2026-8422

CVE-2026-8422 concerns the WordPress plugin Remove meta boxes per user role (versions up to and including 1.01). The vulnerability stems from missing or incorrect nonce validation on the remove-meta-boxes-per-user-role page, enabling CSRF. This could allow unauthenticated attackers to modify or r...

CVE-2026-9599 Tectite Forms <= 1.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update

The Tectite Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the admininit function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings,...

CVE-2026-9599 Tectite Forms <= 1.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update

The Tectite Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the admininit function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings,...

EUVD-2026-33894

The Tectite Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the admininit function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings,...

CVE-2026-9723 Google Plus One Bottom <= 0.0.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Plugin Settings Update via Settings Page

The Google Plus One Bottom plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the googlePlusOneAdmin function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the...

Security Bulletin: Security Vulnerabilities have been found in IBM Verify Identity Access and IBM Security Verify Access

Summary Security Vulnerabilities have been addressed in IBM Verify Identity Access and IBM Security Verify Access Vulnerability Details CVEID:CVE-2025-12635 DESCRIPTION: IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5, 9.0 and IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 25.0.0.12 are affected ...

Exploit for Missing Authentication for Critical Function in Mcpjam Inspector

CVE-2026-23744 --- Description MCPJam inspector is a loca...

CVE-2026-10127

A weakness has been identified in Edimax BR-6478AC 1.23. This affects the function formStaDrvSetup of the file /goform/formStaDrvSetup of the component POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument rootAPmac causes command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has...

CVE-2026-10164

A vulnerability was found in Edimax BR-6478AC 1.23. Impacted is the function formUSBFolder of the file /goform/formUSBFolder of the component POST Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument ShareName/SelectName results in buffer overflow. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit ha...

CVE-2026-45609

mcp-security provides Security and Authorization support for Model Context Protocol in Spring AI. Prior to 0.1.9, the mcp-security framework fails to implement the mandatory SSRF mitigations outlined in the Model Context Protocol MCP security specifications. Specifically, it processes untrusted...