57059 matches found
EUVD-2026-31499
JupyterHub is software that allows users to create a multi-user server for Jupyter notebooks. In versions 4.1.0 through 5.4.4, XSRF protection updated in 4.1.0 inappropriately treated requests with Sec-Fetch-Mode: no-cors as same-origin requests, bypassing XSRF checks. The JSON API is not affecte...
CVE-2026-39965 TypeBot: SSRF via Open Redirect Bypass in HTTP Request and Code Blocks
TypeBot is a chatbot builder tool. Versions 3.15.2 and prior contain an SSRF via Open Redirect Bypass as the HTTP Request block and Code block validate the initial request URL via validateHttpReqUrl to block private IPs and cloud metadata hostnames. However, the HTTP clients ky and fetch follow 3...
CVE-2026-33712
Typebot is a chatbot builder tool. In versions 3.15.2 and prior, the preview chat endpoint POST /api/v1/typebots/typebotId/preview/startChat allows unauthenticated users to achieve Server-Side Request Forgery SSRF by supplying a custom typebot definition with server-side code blocks. The fetch...
CVE-2026-34207
TypeBot is a chatbot builder tool. In versions prior to 3.16.0, SSRF protection for Webhook / HTTP Request blocks validates only the URL string, blocked hostname literals, and literal IP formats. It does not resolve DNS before allowing the request. As a result, a hostname such as ssrf-repro.examp...
CVE-2026-34207
TypeBot SSRF protection bypass (CVE-2026-34207) affects versions
CVE-2026-34207 TypeBot: SSRF Protection Bypass via DNS-Resolved Hostnames in Webhook / HTTP Request Validation
TypeBot is a chatbot builder tool. In versions prior to 3.16.0, SSRF protection for Webhook / HTTP Request blocks validates only the URL string, blocked hostname literals, and literal IP formats. It does not resolve DNS before allowing the request. As a result, a hostname such as ssrf-repro.examp...
CVE-2026-33712 TypeBot: Unauthenticated SSRF via isolated-vm fetch in preview chat endpoint bypasses SSRF controls
Typebot is a chatbot builder tool. In versions 3.15.2 and prior, the preview chat endpoint POST /api/v1/typebots/typebotId/preview/startChat allows unauthenticated users to achieve Server-Side Request Forgery SSRF by supplying a custom typebot definition with server-side code blocks. The fetch...
CVE-2026-7615
The Widget Context plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the savewidgetcontextsettings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify widget...
CVE-2026-7615
The CVE-2026-7615 entry concerns the WordPress Widget Context plugin (versions ≤ 1.3.3). Vulnerability: Cross-Site Request Forgery due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in save_widget_context_settings, allowing unauthenticated attackers to modify widget visibility context settings stored i...
CVE-2026-4070
The Alfie – Feed Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the alfiemanage function which handles feed deletion via the 'delete' GET parameter. This makes it possible for...
CVE-2026-4070 Alfie <= 1.2.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Feed Deletion via 'delete' Parameter
The Alfie – Feed Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the alfiemanage function which handles feed deletion via the 'delete' GET parameter. This makes it possible for...
CVE-2026-4070
The Alfie – Feed Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the alfiemanage function which handles feed deletion via the 'delete' GET parameter. This makes it possible for...
EUVD-2026-31411
The Alfie – Feed Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the alfiemanage function which handles feed deletion via the 'delete' GET parameter. This makes it possible for...
GHSA-67HJ-8239-CMF5 Concrete CMS is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/backend/file removeFavoriteFolder($id)
Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery CSRF at concrete/controllers/backend/file removeFavoriteFolder$id...
GHSA-QJ94-6RX6-27FR Concrete CMS is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/backend/file addFavoriteFolder($id)
Concrete CMS 9 through 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery CSRF at concrete/controllers/backend/file addFavoriteFolder$id...
GHSA-44Q4-354F-C826 Concrete CMS is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/backend/file approveVersion()
Concrete CMS 9 through 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery CSRF at concrete/controllers/backend/file approveVersion...
GHSA-6QJH-P324-694F Concrete CMS is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/backend/file rescanMultiple()
Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery CSRF at concrete/controllers/backend/file rescanMultiple...
WordPress plugin Widget Context 跨站请求伪造漏洞
WordPress and WordPress plugins are both products of the WordPress Foundation. WordPress is a blog platform developed using the PHP language. This platform allows for the creation of personal blog websites on servers based on PHP and MySQL. A WordPress plugin is an application extension. WordPres...
CVE-2026-8435
Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery CSRF at concrete/controllers/backend/file approveVersion. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N...
CVE-2026-7882
Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below is vulnerable to unauthorized file deletion due to an Inverted CSRF token check in the DeleteFile controller. The code throws an error when the token IS valid and proceeds with file deletion when the token is invalid or missing. This effectively disables CSRF protecti...